• Tobacco lawsuits are brought by citizens who believe that tobacco companies knew about the health risk of smoking and failed to warn smokers about the dangers and addictiveness of cigarettes. Such lawsuits have been carried out since the 1950s, and began to succeed in the courts in 2000.Slate: A Tobacco Lawsuit Primer (April 25, 2000)

    On December 15, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that plaintiffs can sue over the tobacco company marketing of so-called "light" cigarettes, and that federal laws covering tobacco advertising do not preempt states from suing tobacco companies.Bloomberg: 'Light' Cigarette Suits Allowed by U.S. Supreme Court (Update4) (December 15, 2008)

  • Tobacco Lawsuit History

    The first tobacco lawsuits were filed in the 1950s, but almost always failed. The tobacco companies argued that the harmful effects of smoking had been recognized for decades; people choose to smoke and so are personally responsible if they suffer ill effects.Slate: A Tobacco Lawsuit Primer (April 25, 2000)

    In the late 1990s, plaintiffs began introducing scientific documentation of the chemical dependency generated by smoking—and proof that the tobacco companies were well aware of its addictive properties.Slate: A Tobacco Lawsuit Primer (April 25, 2000) The first successful tobacco lawsuit was awarded in February 2000, when a California jury ordered Philip Morris to pay $51.5 million to a California smoker with inoperable lung cancer.Slate: A Tobacco Lawsuit Primer (April 25, 2000)

  • Altria Group v. Good

    The most recent case, called Altria Group v. Good, argues that Philip Morris (now owned by Altria Group) marketed low tar and low nicotine cigarettes as less harmful than regular brands. Litigants argued that smokers compensate for "light" cigarettes by taking longer puffs and smoking more cigarettes.Washington Post: Court Rules in Favor of Smokers Who Seek to Sue Big Tobacco (December 15, 2008)

    The lawsuit cited internal Philip Morris documents that proved that they were aware of the fact that smokers compensated in this manner. The lawsuit won under Maine state law, but Philip Morris appealed, arguing that federal law regulating advertising precludes state law.Washington Post: Court Rules in Favor of Smokers Who Seek to Sue Big Tobacco (December 15, 2008)

    The U.S. Supreme Court split 5-4, deciding that in this case, national law does not preempt state law.Washington Post: Court Rules in Favor of Smokers Who Seek to Sue Big Tobacco (December 15, 2008)

About this page

What is this?

Page Manager

This page has no page manager.
What is this?

Vertical Manager

This page has no vertical manager.