• DNA is unique in each individual. Given that each person is genetically unique, material and fluids found at crime scenes can be used to identify the perpetrator. DNA evidence usually refers to the use of this technology at criminal trials.

  On March 2, 2009, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case brought by a federal inmate in Alaska who wants access to DNA evidence from his court case to help overturn his rape conviction. Alaska is one of six states that do not give convicted felons such access.New York Times: The Right to DNA Evidence (March 1, 2009)

• Fast Facts

  1. Registered sex offenders must submit DNA to be included in CODIS
  2. DNA stands for: deoxyribonucleic acid
  3. DNA is the fundamental building block for an individual's genetic makeup
  4. Its found in virtually every cell in the human body
  5. 1869: DNA isolated by Friedrich Miescher from pus in the bandages of wounded soldiers and fish sperm
  6. 1984: Human Genome Project started

• DNA Profile Comparisons

  DNA is collected at a crime scene by carefully extracting samples of hair, fingernails, teeth, blood, or other bodily fluids that have been left behind. The DNA is then extracted from the tissue sample and analyzed. If the suspect is known, the sample of DNA would be compared to the sample of the suspect. If the suspect is unknown, investigators will use an FBI computer program called CODIS to match the sample DNA with another in the database.

• DNA Exonerations

  DNA evidence can prove that a suspect was involved in a crime. On the other hand, there have been many instances of DNA evidence leading to the overturning of a conviction when the DNA does not link the accused to a crime. In several criminal cases DNA evidence has proven the innocence of those wrongfully accused.

• Case For William Osborne

  The case in court is from William Osborne, a man convicted in 1993 on the basis of DNA evidence for the rape and physical assault of a Anchorage prostitute. The test used in 1993 is known as the D-Q test, which cannot identify specific persons. Since Osborne's conviction, a new more sensitive DNA test has been created, the STR test. Osborne argues the STR test would prove his innocence. The Alaska state courts rejected that argument, and Osborne's attorneys appealed.New York Times: The Right to DNA Evidence (March 1, 2009)

• Related Mahalo Pages

  How to Become a Detective | CODIS | Genealogy | Baby Grace | Genetic Genealogy | Charles Chatman | Copernicus Grave | Steven Barnes | Danny McIlhone | How to Become a Crime Scene Investigator | How to Become a Forensic Scientist | How to Get a Free Paternity Test | Carolyn Muncey

Categories

Would you like to become this page's manager? Mahalo pages can make up to $50 a month.

 

What is this?

View Top Managers

• View History
• Discuss on the Message Board
• Embed this Page
• Share this page