District of Columbia vs. Heller

    • Arguments heard by the Supreme Court on March 18, 2008
    • Case argues the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 is a violation of the second amendment
    • Law bans the ownership of handguns in the District of Columbia except for retired and active police officers
    • A federal appeals court struck down the law as unconstitutional
    • This was the first time a federal court ruled a handgun ban infringed upon constitutional rights
    • It was only the second time a federal court interpreted the second amendment as a protection of an individual's right to bear arms for personal use
  • The District of Columbia vs. Heller case, brought before the Supreme Court on March 18, 2008, was an appeal of Parker v. District of Columbia.

    The Court's June 26, 2008, ruling supported the lower court's view of the second amendment, arguing that the constitution prohibits an absolute ban on handguns.The New York Times: Justices Rule for Individual Gun Rights (June 27, 2008)

  • Parker v. District of Columbia

    In the case of Parker v. District of Columbia, a lower appeals court became the first federal court to rule that a handgun ban infringed upon citizens' second amendment constitutional rights. It was only the second decision to explicitly view the second amendment as a protection of an individual's right to firearm ownership for personal use. The Supreme Court ruling will be considered a major statement on the status of the second amendment in the United States.Washingtonian: DC Gun Rights: Do You Want This... (March 1, 2008)
  • Candidates Weigh In

    Addressing a sensitive issue in the middle of a presidential campaign, the District of Columbia vs. Heller decision elicited comments from both Senators Barack Obama and John McCain.

About this page

  • Page Views
    0
What is this?
No one is currently managing this page.
What is this?
This page currently has no vertical manager.