silverhammer's Avatar
silverhammer 17
86 Asked
1086 Answered
546 Best
2
No one has voted on this question yet :(
1 year, 9 months ago

Your Tea Party is a Koch Party, now what?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129425186

Now that it's been revealed that most Grass Roots campaigns against the Government are really Astroturf campaigns (funded by the very animal they proclaim to fight), how can you recover from this embarrassment and start over?

Would your political agenda survive without dirty money? There are many valid and important views that have been overlooked due to a lack of funding. Would yours have gone by the wayside too if not for the Koch Industries? Does that make the hiding of funding and false advertising by these groups justifiable or hypocritical? How does it make your politics any different from what you're fighting?

Extra points for answers without rhetoric and comparisons to things that detract from answering the question.
Tip for best answer: M$1.52
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

1 Answer

-2
colonial butros's Avatar
colonial butros | 1 year, 9 months ago
6
Why aren't rich people (in this case, the 2 rich Koch brothers) allowed to give to political movements they support? Why does that make it dirty money?

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
silverhammer's Avatar
silverhammer | 1 year, 9 months ago Report

Businesses (Koch Industries) ARE allowed to give money now. It's the law. It's who and how the money is being used that brings this particular instance into question.

Listen to the article (or read about it in the New Yorker), then try answering again.

http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=129425186&m=129446997

albanian's Avatar
albanian | 1 year, 9 months ago Report

If a computer billionaire like Bill Gates were to be fighting environmental regulations, then I'd think gosh what a shame, but it's his opinion. But when an oil and paper industry giant like this Koch is secretively funding anti-environment "think tanks" and "grass roots" that directly affect his industries, that's blatantly foul play.

colonial butros's Avatar
colonial butros | 1 year, 9 months ago Report

Its not foul play to use your money for your interest, in funding think tanks. Just because think tanks receive money from him doesn't mean its predestined they'll find evidence that support just his beliefs.

albanian's Avatar
albanian | 1 year, 9 months ago Report

You mean it's just coincidence that they always do? Perhaps a sufficiently enlightened billionaire would fund independent research; but, not the Koch brothers. They keep a tight rein on everything.

colonial butros's Avatar
colonial butros | 1 year, 9 months ago Report

I DID listen to it. Its full of misconceptions about the tea party and libertarianism. The tea party is for a smaller government. And if the Koch brothers are for that, then why can't they give money to that. Blaming problems on lobbying is non-sense.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates