keepontryin's Avatar
keepontryin 16
298 Asked
981 Answered
648 Best
0
No one has voted on this question yet :(
2 years, 7 months ago via

Which takes more faith to believe: "First there was nothing, then it exploded", or "in the beginning God.." Don't they both take faith?

Tip for best answer: M$3.00
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

6 Answers

0
psionandy's Avatar
psionandy | 2 years, 7 months ago
4
Based on current levels of scientific literacy I'd say that for most people there is very little difference between the two.

After all, is there really any difference in the following two statements.

"I believe that God created the universe because Reverend Smith told me so" and "I believe in the Big Bang theory because my science teacher Dr Jones told me so".

Both Rev Smith and Dr Jones may be fine people. They may be equally earnest in their views. How can any person choose one over the other?

Well your religious person may choose Rev Smith because they have also had some sort of personal experience with God. But a scientist will disagree and say 'where is the evidence?'

When it comes to evidence its a sad fact that most people who say that the "Big Bang" was the start of the universe can't actually say what the Big Bang was. They would in fact be hard pressed to give any supporting evidence. 9/10 people wouldn't even mention "Doppler shift" or be aware of "why is the night sky black" So all they are doing is agreeing with Dr Jones because their friends agree with Dr Jones. No evidence is involved, so this is Faith. And Faith in exactly the same way that the followers of Rev Smith have.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
keepontryin's Avatar
keepontryin | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

several good points. Thanks for your answer.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
the_speaker's Avatar
the_speaker | 2 years, 7 months ago
0
yes, but what do you think is more believable, a creator to create everything and all the complex systems of his creation, or that an explosion that happened out of nothingness created the complex systems
source(s):
my opinion

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
kty2777's Avatar
kty2777 | 2 years, 7 months ago
21
The short answer is yes, they both require faith

One is faith in a higher being capable of creating everything - but with no way of proving it.

The other is faith in the "scientific method" as a tool to discover how the world works - with the ability to prove or disprove every theory using this method.

That's pretty much what 'scientific method' means - can this be proved, can it be repeated, does it fit every known fact at present?? Rational discourse and logical experimentation means you should arrive at a provable conclusion.

It's no so much a question of faith, its about where you put that faith and why.

What logic, or lack of logic, do you use to help you decipher the world? That's always going to be a personal choice and we should all be allowed to make that choice without prejudice or fear of retribution.

Which faith is hardest? both require commitment but I think it's easier to have faith in something solid and scientific.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
kty2777's Avatar
kty2777 | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

Indeed, I would agree that for some its a predisposition - for me science is 'easy' - it makes sense - I can logically go through things. I've tried to study religion and be involved in religion, but I can't. It leaves me no room to maneuver or to individualize my world view.

It's a good question and one I often debate with my Biology students - they forget that faith is required to study science too :)

silverhammer's Avatar
silverhammer | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

Since when is "First there was nothing, then it exploded" "solid and scientific"? Classic. :)

There's more scientific proof in "like produces like" than there ever will be for "evolution from a single organism".

keepontryin's Avatar
keepontryin | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

I think that it's easier for some people to believe in what they understand as science, ans easier for others to believe in what they see as spiritual. I think it varies from person to person, and I'm not sure how much real choice we have in which way we choose to go with it. It may be more of a predisposition or an environment (the old nature or nurture question), but I sure appreciate your answer. The question sure gives us something to think about.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
mahaazar's Avatar
mahaazar | 2 years, 7 months ago
4
Even though both cannot be proved scientifically, look at the following example.

1st belief: "Once there was a stone. It suddenly changed into a bicycle. After some years, it suddenly changed into a bike. After some years, it suddenly changed into a car. The car wished to fly. Then it suddenly changed into a airplane. Then the air plane wished to go to other planets. Then it suddenly changed into a rocket.

2nd belief: Man created bicycle, bike, car, air plane & rocket.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
cflores619's Avatar
cflores619 | 2 years, 7 months ago
4
You're right, they both take faith.

But doesn't most things in this life? Doesn't sitting on a chair require some measure of faith? Faith that the chair will support your weight?

Personally, I think it would take more faith to believe that the world just happened into existence. That doesn't seem logical to me. The idea of Intelligent Design and a Creator makes much more sense to me. I wholeheartedly believe that God created this world to function as He designed it to. I do believe that He gave man some control of this world, and it has become what we have managed it to become. However, I believe He remains in ultimate, sovereign control.

I recently gave birth to my daughter. Throughout my entire pregnancy with her, I was continually amazed at the intentionality of the process. There is nothing accidental about human life being conceived and developed within another human being. I cannot be so inhuman as to believe that we are mechanically controlled by scientific law. As I felt my child move within my abdomen, knowing that without my thought or conscious control, she was being fed and sustained from my body, I knew that Someone was guiding each step of her development. Someone had intentionally designed my body to function in such way that would bring forth new life. Labor only confirmed those thoughts. A woman's body works very naturally in labor to bring forth life. I could have been completely out of it in my mind and still have had a perfectly normal labor because my body was basically working all on its own. That alone is proof of Intelligent Design.

Each person that you ask your question to will resolve a different answer. But that doesn't mean every answer bears truth. Truth is not relative, and "individualized worldviews" mean nothing in the grand scheme of things. Truth is truth, simply put. It cannot be altered based on preference and it will not be demeaned to fit into our comfortable, compartmentalized thought processes.

I am interested, since you brought up this "conundrum" to discover what belief you hold. I have a feeling you are biased one way or the other and posed the question to provoke debate. Please share your thoughts.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
cflores619's Avatar
cflores619 | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

I didn't mean for you to take my comment about debate negatively. It may have come across so, but was not intended to. Perhaps "debate" was too strong a word. I do see that you are provoking good conversation and therefore merely wanted to hear your stance. I didn't intend to insinuate that you were instigating trivial arguments. I'm sorry that it came across that way! I appreciate your question. It does give us all food for thought.

keepontryin's Avatar
keepontryin | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

While I am shocked at your characterization of me as a provocateur of debate (ok, maybe not "shocked"), as I see myself as more of an instigator of good conversation, I will tell you that I believe that God created the universe. I did not always believe so, and I hold no feelings of superiority or animosity toward those who disagree with me. The answers I get to questions like this fascinate me. This forum, to me, is a cool place. I envision us sitting around at the end of the day, enjoying a sunset with a glass of wine or a beer (or a cup of coffee and a slice of pie), and someone says, "Hey you guys, what do you think of this question I heard the other day....." I appreciate your answer,as I do the others. I consider a question to be "good" if I get reasoned answers on both sides. That is my goal.

keepontryin's Avatar
keepontryin | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

Oh I wasn't truly offended, just having a little fun. I appreciated your answer. Thanks

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-2
bas's Avatar
bas | 2 years, 7 months ago
3
1st. How can 'nothing' explode?
2nd. i think its all a pile of s**t

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
keepontryin's Avatar
keepontryin | 2 years, 7 months ago Report

1st. It's sort of a joking way to imply that holding to the Big Bang Theory takes a certain amount of faith.
2nd. Is it the origin of the universe in general that reminds you of mounds of defecation, or something in particular about this specific conversation?

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates