Which of the European colonial powers in the Americas treated the Native American population the best?
... Spain, Portugal, Britain, France, etc.
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$2 Answers
----quote
Colonialism normally refers to a period of history from the 15th to the 20th century when people from Europe built colonies on other continents. The reasons for the practice of colonialism at this time include:
* The profits to be made.
* To expand the power of the metropole.
* To escape persecution in the metropole.
* To convert the indigenous population to the colonists' religion.
----quote----
information obtain from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_power
History dictates that no European colonial powers treated any other race or indigenous people of any country or any continent better than each other. If you can prove to me that there was one colonial power that was more benevolent than the rest please let me know also bring the evidence to justify it. From the explanation above you do not need to be a professor to understand that any country or countries who set out to achieve this goal cannot do so unless they take over the foreign country.
Due to the migration of the Europeans to the Americas. The Native Americans population was nearly wiped because of War and violence, Exploitation,Massacres and diseases.
----quote----
Americans' eagerness to expand westward prompted a long series of Indian Wars and an Indian removal policy that stripped the native peoples of their land. The Louisiana Purchase of French-claimed territory under President Thomas Jefferson in 1803 almost doubled the nation's size. The War of 1812, declared against Britain over various grievances and fought to a draw, strengthened U.S. nationalism. A series of U.S. military incursions into Florida led Spain to cede it and other Gulf Coast territory in 1819.
----quote----
information quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_states_of_america#History
----quoted----
It is estimated, based on archaeological data and written records from European settlers, that from 8 to 112 million indigenous people lived in the Americas when the 1492 voyage of Christopher Columbus began a historical period of large-scale European interaction with the Americas. European contact with what they called the "New World" led to the European colonization of the Americas, with millions of emigrants (willing and unwilling) from the "Old World" eventually resettling in the Americas.
----quoted----
information quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples
----quoted----
While the population of Old World peoples in the Americas steadily grew in the centuries after Columbus, the population of the American indigenous peoples plummeted. This was caused mostly by their susceptibility to old world diseases (smallpox, influenza, bubonic plague and pneumonic plagues, etc.) which they had never been exposed to. Secondly, direct conflict and warfare with European colonizers and other Native American tribes caused populations to fall and societies to be disrupted. The extent (and, to a lesser extent, the causes) of this population decline have long been the subject of academic
----quoted----
information quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples
You can also read the page on this link give you an idea of the Europeans early conquests of the Americas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_colonization_of_the_Americas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peop...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_power
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_states_of_america#History
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trail_of_tears
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$Spain, however, was not as interested in taking their land from them or making profits from the trade of fur. They wanted to convert the Native Americans to Christianity, and while I suppose it could be argued that they treated them badly by only seeing them as potential converts and trying to force their beliefs upon them, they were certainly a step ahead of some British colonies who slaughtered them in their greed for land. Spanish missionaries took the time to live with the Native Americans and learn their language, something many of the other colonial powers had no interest in.
That's not to say, however, the British were all bad. The Iroquois favored them over French colonialists, who were trying to extend their hold over their colonies in Canada to include more of the south below it. This alliance was one more of convenience than one of mutual respect, but it just seems unfair to paint the British colonialists as the only ones who mistreated the Native Americans when it was truly across the board.
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$When,where,why ,how and how come did they do a good job? please respond to this quote
----quote----
Deliberate infection?
One of the most contentious issues relating to disease depopulation in the Americas concerns the degree to which Europeans deliberately infected indigenous peoples with diseases such as smallpox. Cook asserts that there is no evidence that the Spanish attempted to infect the American natives.14 The cattle introduced by the Spanish polluted the water reserves which Native Americans dug in the fields to accumulate rain water. In response, the Franciscans and Dominicans created public fountains and aqueducts to guarantee access to drinking water.2 But when the Franciscans lost their privileges in 1572, many of these fountains were not guarded any more. Deliberate well poisoning may have happened.2 Although no proof of such poisoning has been found, some historians believe the decrease of the population correlates with the end of religious orders' control of the water.2
----quote----
information quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples