What is the primary reason I should make the transition to 4th Edition (4E) Dungeons & Dragons from v3.5?
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$5 Answers
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
The main difference between 3.x and 4 is that the former is a fantasy resource management game and 4 is a fantasy adventure game.
3.x is all about managing hit points, spell slots, healing spells, potions, etc. You need to get through encounters efficiently. While 4 removes most of that, and gives each character a bunch of powers to use. There is no management per se, because things are based off a preset scale. For example, in 3.x you could get a bag with 100 Healing Potions and use those to force your way through more difficult stuff. If 4, all healing is based off the Healing Surge mechanic. You can't "beat" it by having 100 healing potions, they just stop working.
3.x is simulationist. The powers and abilities are trying to be realistic... well, as realistic as a fantasy game can be. If you swing your sword, you swing a sword. While in 4, its more of a meta-feel. You might have a power like "Cleaving Strike" that you can do once an encounter. It doesn't really make sense that you can only hit that hard once, its a game mechanic. So what you do with the rules and the "story" in your head don't match up exactly the same.
3.x has a "sweet spot." When you are really low level, you are too weak. When you are really high level, things are way too easy. There is a sweet spot in the middle where it is most fun (opinions vary on the exact level spread). 4 is designed so that every character is fully playable, and of a relative power level throughout the game. Wizards are not "One Spell Wonders" at level one, they can be in there blasting away with the fighters and others. Also, healers are not forced to sacrifice "fun" stuff and forced to just spend every turn casting Cure Light Wounds on everyone else.
All in all, I really like a lot of what they did with 4E and believe it is worth converting. My one caveat is that a lot of the powers mechanics are based around using a map and miniatures. If you do not like using maps and miniatures, a lot of 4E's tactical play may be difficult to use, particularly classes like Warlord and Rogue, who are very much based on movement, and allowing people to move out of turn, or forcing enemies to move.
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
But based on some reviews, the major benefit of 4e is that the prep-time for the GM is much shorter. I don't know if that is a benefit for your players, but it is a benefit for the time-constrained GM.
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
