2 years, 2 months ago
What is Natural law? Does Natural law clash with communism and atheism?
Are utopian societies inheritantly evil because they destroy free will?
How does Natural law provide freedom and liberty?
Does Natural law clash with oppressive ideologies?
Does atheism and evolution work together to destroy natural law?
How does Natural law provide freedom and liberty?
Does Natural law clash with oppressive ideologies?
Does atheism and evolution work together to destroy natural law?
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$1 Answer
Q1. That assumes people did not freely volunteer into such a society. Being utopian, either they where created to it without ability to change or they willfully subjected themselves to it. No contradiction to free will. A society is not utopian if the participants are not free to choose or aware of the option to choose. Have we learned nothing from Logan’s Run?
Q2. It doesn’t. It’s innate. Axioms either are or are not. If existent they exist unto themselves without regard of foreign integrity. Only lack of absolutes in universal law can provide concepts like freedom and liberty.
Q3. Non sequitur. Natural law by definition is immune to exterior objects.
Q4. Non sequitur +10. Atheism has nothing to do with evolution, as to evolution is intrinsically linked to natural law (under assumed basic definitions).
Still waiting to see how the pinko’s figure into this.
Q2. It doesn’t. It’s innate. Axioms either are or are not. If existent they exist unto themselves without regard of foreign integrity. Only lack of absolutes in universal law can provide concepts like freedom and liberty.
Q3. Non sequitur. Natural law by definition is immune to exterior objects.
Q4. Non sequitur +10. Atheism has nothing to do with evolution, as to evolution is intrinsically linked to natural law (under assumed basic definitions).
Still waiting to see how the pinko’s figure into this.
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
I'm suggesting God follows Divine Law and he does upholds Justice.
Communism advocates a Godless state and opposes organized religious structures and privileges.
Atheist do not believe that God created the Universe rather they believe the reverse, the universe is creating God and the mechanism for creation is evolution.
I am proposing Natural Law is supreme and unapproachable and absolute.
Natural law, if taken as that which is immutable, does not necessitate a religious pretext. God is not a necessary component as the concept applies equally functional in a secular context. The Big Bang theory (incidentally proposed by a Catholic priest) is likewise sufficient in providing the frame work for natural law, as all it requires at base are a particular set of parameters that are inviolable. Whether those parameters are God’s omnipotence or the order in which the universe must function to ‘be’ is inconsequential to the statement ‘natural law exists.’
If natural law exists it cannot, by definition, ever not exist.
If it is always existent, it will always be.
If natural law is invariable it must always be so.
If it is forever and constant it cannot be changed
If natural law is constant God cannot change it for he is infallible.
If God changes it he is not omnipotent and therefore not God.
God cannot change natural law
If God can change natural law then it is not inalienable
If it is not absolute then it is not natural law
Or....
The universe exists
Natural law exists within it
The universe must be for natural law to be
As such, God is not necessary for natural law to exist as it exists unto itself without change. Atheists, communists, scientific theories etc are all necessarily bound to action within it’s confines.