skyvan's Avatar
skyvan 3
48 Asked
134 Answered
45 Best
2
No one has voted on this question yet :(
3 years, 1 month ago

What is better for travel photography? A Super Wide Angel lens ins the range of 11-16mm or a 35mm lens?

I will have this on a DX lens and both lenses have very close f-stops within 1 stop of each other, with the 35 being about 4/5 of an f-stop faster than the super wide angle? Please provide examples to support your reasoning about why each one is better for travel photography. I am thinking about getting rid of the 18-55 I just bought yesterday because of its crappy f-stop ratings.
Tip for best answer: M$5.00
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

2 Answers

-1
kevinbernard31's Avatar
kevinbernard31 | 3 years, 1 month ago
4
The lens you choose for travel photography depends on a lot of factors including the length of the trip, the nature of the trip etc. However the following things should be taken into mind before choosing a lense for your travel photography.

Weight
Versatility
Lens Speed

I suggest you to read these useful tips before you choose your lens for your travel photography: http://digital-photography-school.com/travel-photography-which-lenses-to-take

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
skyvan's Avatar
skyvan | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

Helpful, but not of best answer quality..I've tipped you $2 MD because it definitely was still helpful.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-1
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 3 years, 1 month ago
19
The type of travel photography you do is most important in deciding upon a lens. But from what you say in your question, you appear to be on the wrong track. Super wide angle lenses are of little use except for specialized architectural shots. A 35mm is an old standard, but won't give you the flexibility of a zoom lens. An 18-200mm such as Nikon sells will probably suit all the photo opportunities you encounter.

If you are using a modern digital SLR the f stop range is of little importance. The modern cameras are so light sensitive and have such high speed shutters that the problems old, slow films used to create no longer exist.

If you are still using a film camera, you should replace it for travel. Film is simply not practical for travel.
images:

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

You asked which is better for travel photography. Neither of your listed choices would be good for that purpose.

hillo's Avatar
hillo | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

I would add that the lens mentioned and pictured here (or a similar one from any competitor) is probably the only lens you'll need for travel or home or most shooting purposes - unless you have a specific situation like sports or low light or super wide angle needs. This lens is so versatile and light and it has the VR or vibration reduction which gives you 'hand held' control where you may have used a tripod with a non VR lens. (Source. I am a photographer...) Good luck.

hillo's Avatar
hillo | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

Almost sounds as if you may have the answer to your own question skyvan - in that you are showing a preference for the wider angle lens (11-16), and if so then not sure what you may have been looking for here...

We're all just looking to assist you. The super wide is going to be a very specific look - if that's your goal then that's your lens. The fixed lens, the 35 will be just that, give you one focal length and you work around that. As far as low light - the faster the lens the more expensive it will be - so if you have an unlimited budget then perhaps you are able to afford something as fast as f2.8, most of us are not in that ballpark. Best of luck in your photo travels.

skyvan's Avatar
skyvan | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

A superwide angle at f/2.8 is not that expensive if you go for an off-brand which is what I'll do no matter what, the reason I chose no best answer is because it was an a or b question and I got c.

skyvan's Avatar
skyvan | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

I have a d90...I have a 55-200 lens (similiar to the one shown but does not go as wide) and I am having problems with aperture, I like to take pictures in dark place sometimes and have been ghainvg problems with slow shutter speeds with my 18-55 3.5-5.6 with VR, which is why I'm looking to see if an 11-16 or a 35 is better, I don't care about zooms, I asked a specific question with an a and b answer and I got c as a response.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates