Scalar Energy proposes getting energy from nothing - energy from vacuum. It is also called zero point energy, and runs in the same lines of other mythical energy sources, like perpetual motion engines...

The truth is nothing has been proved until now. These are just theories.

Apparentely the main proponent of this theory in the US - Tom Bearden - has constructed a "vacuum engine", that outputs more energy than it spends, but on his website there is no trace of independent peer review of his work.

i am giving you all various kind of articles from which u will get every information about solar energy.

check the links in source to ghet articles

This stuff has no basis in physics. There's no mathematical model that corresponds to any observable or testable phenomenon. I've skimmed through a couple of descriptions cited. There's a lot of jargon thrown around by the proponents that sounds vaguely "scientific", but it's meaningless, as far as I can tell. To (mis)quote Inigo Montoya in The Princess Bride: "You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means."

That said, the placebo effect is "real" in the sense that certain conditions, under certain circumstances, will improve with treatment that does not *directly* cause any physical or physiological changes. Maybe if you believe it's helpful, it will work for you. But it's probably cheaper (and more relaxing) to pay for a nice therapeutic massage on occasion.

The assertion that overunity energy from the vacuum is a myth (like perpetual motion machines) is flawed. For example, the atom is a perpetual motion phenomenon. Why and how? Why doesn't it deplete its energy and just wind down? Scalar electromagnetism (also knows as zero point energy or electrogravity) is simply a result of converging electromagnetic waves from three different directions so that they cancel out (a standing wave), then, as Bearden outlines, you merely vary the potential (voltage or energy level) and it "bleeds into electrogravity," aka scalars. Ranking defense researchers attest to it. Yes, it seems strange, but it doesn't require an impossibly high energy demand. Instead, it's simply a matter of timing and resonance (on a fine scale). How does it occur? Presumably, the dark energy of the universe is at play. As the 2011 Nobel winner in physics noted on NPR, dark energy may be a kind of zero point energy. As he said, the question is the relationship between that zero point energy and electromagnetism. Bearden notes that they are reciprocal: one can convert into the other, i.e. converge and cancel out light and it can bleed into scalars; AND converge and cancel out scalars and they can convert into light. And, if that's true, then a higher order convergence of dark energy (on a greater scale) may actually convert into a variety of lesser scale electrogravitics and/or electromagnetism.

The key dilemma of the above reply was conservation of energy. Scalar researchers say that scalars respect that by exceeding the Einstein limit by simply marginally speeding and/or slowing the flow ot time. Specifically, if you focus that scalar energy (a kind of artificial gravity) on a place, it slows time in that focus, while it slightly speeds the flow of time in the surrounding space-time. Which is also suggested by relativity's elasticity of time and by dark states, frozen light (done by converging and canceling out light waves), etc. And if this kind of phenomenon is as such, it merely suggests that the depths of the atom are merely fractions of a larger universal flux, NOT separate whole-numbered quantities in themselves. In other words, the depths of the nucleus would be like event horizons, essentially scalar phenomena involving deeper, high energy waveform. From our perspective, that would have to involve fractional wave form, i.e. something like the half-waves that Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory point to (waves that cycle backward in time from a future black body absorber).

What electrical engineers work with today, claims Bearden, is a subset of a higher-topology EM. Bearden claims that the four "Maxwell's Equations" taught today in electrical engineering are actually an over-simplified subset of Maxwell's original work. The pruning was done by Oliver Heaviside in the late 19th century; Heaviside took Maxwell's original equations, written in Hamilton's quaternions (related to what we nowadays call spinors), and "simplified" them by lopping off the scalar part of the complex numbers, leaving the easy-to-work-with vector part intact-- which radio engineers loved. After all, the entire electronics industry as we know it grew out of the telephone/radio technologies of the early 1900's. Who can argue that the "vector" approach is inadequate?

Well, Bearden says that when Heaviside threw out the scalar part of the quaternionic EM equation, he unknowingly threw out the possibility of unifying gravitation with electromagnetism-- which has been a holy grail for scientists since Einstein himself wrestled with the problem. That's because the scalar part of the quaternion, according to Bearden, was the part that captured or modeled the "stress on the aether"-- which leads to curving/warping spacetime a la Einstein. Tom Bearden says we CAN unify gravity with EM, and convert back and forth between them, if we understand how vectors and scalars relate to one another and what the ramifications are.

Vector fields can evidently be assembled by properly interfering scalar potentials (predicted in 1903-4 by mathematician E.T. Whittaker and probably engineered by the Soviets).

Conversely, scalar fields can be created by destructively interfering vector fields, in a nonlinear medium. Varying the vector components rhythmically produces what Bearden calls "scalar waves". These ripples in spacetime are believed to induce a wavelike stress in the "aether"; this in turn leads to engineering the structure of pure space and/or mass in a localized area-- in other words, implementing General Relativity (spacetime curvature) on the lab bench!

Scalar wavelengths are finer than gamma rays or X rays and only one hundred millionth of a square centimeter in width. They belong to the subtle gravitational field and are also known as gravitic waves. Uniquely, they flow in multiple directions at right angles off electromagnetic waves, as an untapped energy source called 'potentials'. Potentials are particles which are unorganized in hyperspace - pure etheric energy not manifest in the physical world. In comparison, electromagnetic waves (measured by so many hertz or pulses per second, which we are familiar with e.g. radio waves) exist normally in the physical world, but can only be measured up to levels determined by the sensitivity of the equipment being used as to how many cycles per second they operate.

Scalar waves were originally detected by a Scottish mathematical genius called James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) He linked electricity and magnetism and laid the foundation for modern physics, but unfortunately the very fine scalar waves (which he included in his research) were deliberately left out of his work by the 3 men, including Heinrich Hertz, who laid down the laws taught for physics as a discipline at colleges. They dismissed Maxwell's scalar waves or potentials as "mystical" because they were physically unmanifest and only existed in the "ethers" and so were determined to be too ineffectual for further study. These enigmatic (but more powerful than even microwaves when harnessed and concentrated into a beam) scalar waves may have been forgotten except that Nicola Tesla accidentally rediscovered them. He'd originally worked with Thomas Edison who discovered direct current, but Tesla discovered alternating current. The two men disagreed and eventually parted ways and Tesla later experimented using the research of the German Heinrich Hertz, who was proving the existence of electromagnetic waves. Tesla found, while experimenting with violently abrupt direct current electrical charges, that a new form of energy (scalar) came through.

http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/scalar.htm