1 year, 11 months ago
What did you think about the winning goal of the Stanley Cup Series?
Did you see the goal by Kane in overtime last night in Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Playoffs? It had been 49 years since the Blackhawks had won the Stanley Cup. But did you see the goal? No one else did. Many are referring to it as anticlimactic. What are your thoughts?
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$1 Answer
Did I see it live at full speed? No. Did I see th red light go on? No. did I see on replay that it was a fantastic Stanley Cup winning shot? Absolutely. I have looked through all of the media, and have yet to find a reference to the goal that won the Cup as "anti-climactic".
I would sure like to see a couple of your "many" references, just out of curiosity, since it seems to make no sense at all to refer to it as anticlimactic. It was the final and highest climax of the entire series, was it not? I mean, didn't they all stop playing and award the cup to Chicago based on that goal?
I've checked the NY Times, ESPN, NHL.COM, CNN, Yahoo, MSNBC, and FOX, and I found no mention of the goal being referred to as "anticlimactic". In fact, I found this quote that seems to inidicate exactly the opposite is being said:
"Kane will go down as scoring one of the biggest goals in team history."
http://msn.foxsports.com/nhl/story/blackhawks-snap-48-year-stanley-cup-drought-060910
That sounds like almost exactly the opposite of "many referring to it as anticlimactic"
What gives? If this was an anticlimactic moment, some other moment must have been climactic. please share with us your sources and what they said WAS the climactic moment, if not the winning goal? I am truly baffled. maybe if I read or heard a few of your sources I will understand what they are trying to say.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdVn42-vOt8.
I would sure like to see a couple of your "many" references, just out of curiosity, since it seems to make no sense at all to refer to it as anticlimactic. It was the final and highest climax of the entire series, was it not? I mean, didn't they all stop playing and award the cup to Chicago based on that goal?
I've checked the NY Times, ESPN, NHL.COM, CNN, Yahoo, MSNBC, and FOX, and I found no mention of the goal being referred to as "anticlimactic". In fact, I found this quote that seems to inidicate exactly the opposite is being said:
"Kane will go down as scoring one of the biggest goals in team history."
http://msn.foxsports.com/nhl/story/blackhawks-snap-48-year-stanley-cup-drought-060910
That sounds like almost exactly the opposite of "many referring to it as anticlimactic"
What gives? If this was an anticlimactic moment, some other moment must have been climactic. please share with us your sources and what they said WAS the climactic moment, if not the winning goal? I am truly baffled. maybe if I read or heard a few of your sources I will understand what they are trying to say.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdVn42-vOt8.
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$Report Abuse
