Next Question
RSS
Small prints (smaller than, say, 6x9 or so) don't work so well on a wall, individually. If you have a series of decent but not amazing photos from a trip, though, it's a good idea. If you're going to have one frame with a bunch of photos in it, it'll look better if they are themed - for instance, photos from a fall foliage trip, or from winter - if they're disconnected it'll probably be a discombobulated mess.
Photos look best when matted and framed in general, which also allows you to use a larger frame with a smaller print. So you could do, say, a 6x9 in an 8x12" frame. The advantage of the smaller size is that it looks sharper. The mat gives the photo some separation from the frame, and allows you to crop as you want, and the photo won't look funny. You can even mat a diamond shape, a circle, or even something really weird like a triangle.
http://www.picturethisframed.com/2559b1d.html
This kind of treatment is for your best photos. A general rule of thumb is that you should use a print size ~1 smaller than what the frame is for when doing a mat. So, 6x9 in an 8x12, 8x12 in a 12x18, and so on. You can go with even smaller prints than that, but it doesn't work so well. A nice thing about it is you can cut your own mat, and crop and cut your photo however you might want to.
You can go as large as 20x30, but I find that overkill. I recently did a few 16x24" prints, and for my apartment, they are simply too big for frames, at least. They look fine, I just don't know where I'd put them on the wall. They look better more or less as posters. I might mount my large shots on some particle board or something. I find 6x9, 8x10, 8x12, 11x14, 12x18 the most manageable sizes. If you go bigger than that, make sure you want that photo to dominate the wall, because it will. Get a yardstick and make an imaginary square on your wall, just to comprehend how large it is - and if it's framed, make it significantly larger still.
There are some other interesting display options if you don't mind paying for it. You can get things printed on canvas, but here's probably the best looking display piece:
http://fotoflot.com/#
That gets you away from a frame, mounts on a wall, and makes a distinctive impression. But it's not cheap.
Hopefully that gave you some ideas.
Permalink | Report
Many off the rack, plain black glossy frames are indistinguishable from more expensive frames. A good bet is to do a nice job matting--you can do this yourself with an Exacto knife--in a frame one size up from the photo you're putting into it.
Permalink | Report
lamp1023
Answered Question
M$2
December 24, 2008 12:34 AM
What size photo/frame combination would look best to display on a wall?
I want to begin putting my photos that I've taken into frames for display. Would I be better off putting 3 or 4 photos sized 4x6 or 5x7 into one frame? Or enlarging 1 print to a 16x20 or 20x30? Details to consider: Custom frames or off the rack frames, all photos are from a DSLR 10.2 MP camera, most photos are of buildings and architecture and are both day and night shots. I'd like to try to find a balance between cost and aesthetics/appeal. I've attached a link to a picture as an example.
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
- In Visual Arts |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| December 24, 2008 11:35 AM |
Photos look best when matted and framed in general, which also allows you to use a larger frame with a smaller print. So you could do, say, a 6x9 in an 8x12" frame. The advantage of the smaller size is that it looks sharper. The mat gives the photo some separation from the frame, and allows you to crop as you want, and the photo won't look funny. You can even mat a diamond shape, a circle, or even something really weird like a triangle.
http://www.picturethisframed.com/2559b1d.html
This kind of treatment is for your best photos. A general rule of thumb is that you should use a print size ~1 smaller than what the frame is for when doing a mat. So, 6x9 in an 8x12, 8x12 in a 12x18, and so on. You can go with even smaller prints than that, but it doesn't work so well. A nice thing about it is you can cut your own mat, and crop and cut your photo however you might want to.
You can go as large as 20x30, but I find that overkill. I recently did a few 16x24" prints, and for my apartment, they are simply too big for frames, at least. They look fine, I just don't know where I'd put them on the wall. They look better more or less as posters. I might mount my large shots on some particle board or something. I find 6x9, 8x10, 8x12, 11x14, 12x18 the most manageable sizes. If you go bigger than that, make sure you want that photo to dominate the wall, because it will. Get a yardstick and make an imaginary square on your wall, just to comprehend how large it is - and if it's framed, make it significantly larger still.
There are some other interesting display options if you don't mind paying for it. You can get things printed on canvas, but here's probably the best looking display piece:
http://fotoflot.com/#
That gets you away from a frame, mounts on a wall, and makes a distinctive impression. But it's not cheap.
Hopefully that gave you some ideas.
| Asker's Rating: |
• That was very good info. I appreciate the attention to detail. You provided some very good ideas that I wouldn't have thought of. Thanks!
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (2)
December 24, 2008 12:59 AM
I would do off the rack frames, but not combine several into one. Several smaller ones with one larger one would probably look best. Many off the rack, plain black glossy frames are indistinguishable from more expensive frames. A good bet is to do a nice job matting--you can do this yourself with an Exacto knife--in a frame one size up from the photo you're putting into it.
Permalink | Report
lamp1023
December 24, 2008 02:14 AM
Could you please elaborate? I don't understand what you're referring to.
Tip lamp1023 for this comment
Report
December 24, 2008 06:48 AM
- New Source
sorry, forgot to explain further. Its A3 size of paper (11.7" × 16.5"). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_size
Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- dhenz, December 07, 2009 01:40 PM
- chawla, December 07, 2009 01:37 PM
- payingcreditcar..., December 07, 2009 01:08 PM
- conundrum_jahoz..., December 07, 2009 12:47 PM
- lizaangelariepe..., December 07, 2009 12:40 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
