Next Question
Yes. Some, like Fox, are so blatant that they can hardly be called news. In fact, the White House said Fox was not a news station at all.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/18/national/w092256D93.DTL
MSNBC leans heavily the other way (towards the liberal side), though they avoid blatantly lying about the facts, which Fox cannot say.
More balanced news media, like The New York Times, are unfortunately dying out because it doesn't entertain as much as some of the louder, more biased forms of media. People seem to love hearing commentators yell about how much they hate things. That sells more than actual facts.
Permalink | Report
I would argue that the impossibility of completely eliminating bias in reporting is one of the strongest arguments for having free press. The more news outlets there are, the more chance a person has to see all sides of an issue, or to get reporting on all the issues of the day.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| November 03, 2009 10:40 PM |
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/18/national/w092256D93.DTL
MSNBC leans heavily the other way (towards the liberal side), though they avoid blatantly lying about the facts, which Fox cannot say.
More balanced news media, like The New York Times, are unfortunately dying out because it doesn't entertain as much as some of the louder, more biased forms of media. People seem to love hearing commentators yell about how much they hate things. That sells more than actual facts.
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: tealmyster, kareul
Other Answers (1)
November 04, 2009 03:46 PM
All news sources have some political slant. It's simply unavoidable. The fundamental reason for this is that simply by choosing which stories to cover (as well as how much air time / print space to give them), reporters have already exercised their judgment regarding what is and is not "news." Since reporters, like all people, are guided to some degree by their worldviews, the result is some level of bias in all news organizations. Some news outlets do a better job than others of trying to counter this effect and promote "objective" news coverage, while others seem to embrace their slant. I would argue that the impossibility of completely eliminating bias in reporting is one of the strongest arguments for having free press. The more news outlets there are, the more chance a person has to see all sides of an issue, or to get reporting on all the issues of the day.
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: buddawiggi
Answer this Question
Related Questions
No questions found.
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- bowen57, November 27, 2009 07:33 AM
- jeremybowen, November 27, 2009 07:32 AM
- cleo, November 27, 2009 07:29 AM
- markbiddiss, November 27, 2009 07:26 AM
- cinderela722, November 27, 2009 06:50 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
