Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M$1.00 Funded By Mahalo ? |
April 13, 2009 11:49 PM
RSS
Cable / Satellite are on a lot of people's chopping blocks when it comes to shaving month expenses anyway they can.
This year alone, I've already canceled my Sirius subscription. $12 a month may not seem like a lot to most people, but when the provider removes value to me - like taking channels from the genre I like and giving the bandwidth to an XM channel post merger, I called it quits.
Cable was the only option for me until 1994, when DBS became affordable enough to purchase and install for the regular people. I dumped cable in 1994 because the lines in my neighborhood were 13+ years old at the time, and every-single-time it rained, I'd have to deal with picture quality issues until the weather was warm enough to dry the lines again. With that type of wonkyness, there was no way I'd even think about using cable for internet in my area.
Satellite is this/close to being the next item I chop from the budget. Because I'm 20 miles from most of the transmitters in Chicago, it's reasonable to assume I can install a decent antenna on the roof (wow - remember those!?) and get over the air uncompressed (no MPEG4 recompression by the DBS provider) HD programming.
The real kick in the (male reproductive organ) this year was when I received a notice on the 5th of March, dated on the 4th of March, and postmarked on the 3rd of March notifying me that they were again going to raise my rates on the 1st of the month of March. That's low - sending mail 4 days after you've raised the rates to tell me "we're going to raise the rates". Why even bother wasting paper and postage to tell me what you've already done?
I don't bother with premium channels or pay-per-view, since the extra $8-$14 per month isn't sometime I value. IF, and this is a big IF, IF I wanted to see an un-cut un-edited-for-television movie, I can rent it from Lackluster or via online delivery.
Subscription based services will decline this year IMHO because more and more people will start wondering why they need to pay for what they don't want and the programs they do want are available by alternative means - both legally and illegally.
Permalink | Report
The only reason I still have cable is for sporting events. Thanks to the internet, everything else that I want to watch, is available there. And if there are 30 second ads, I will check my email in that short time.
With the recent tiered pricing involving broadband internet, where the heck is tiered pricing for cable? Why can't I pay for certain stations that I watch, why should we have to pay for all these extra channels? The cable companies are probably pissed when people use their broadband to watch shows that were on cable from other places, like Hulu.
I believe much more can be learned from various internet sources. The news is actually breaking. We can find out a lot in real time rather than waiting for the story on the 5pm news. With the introduction of HD movies to the iTunes store, I am getting closer and closer to canceling that cable.
Permalink | Report
However, I think it's days have been numbered since TiVo.
You're right in that there is a larger variety of content available online and it is all available "on demand". However, there is a very significant number of people in North America who don't know how to watch TV online, let alone have high speed internet or sufficient bandwidth to stream or download large television and movies.
We've had a heck of a time transitioning to HDTV that is in contrast, a lot easier than a complete nationwide switch to online television and movie distribution.
It will be a glorious day for the Interwebs when this happens though.
Permalink | Report
Video news. Anything live. Few areas have the necessary broadband speed.
I think it is magazines. Wired seems so 20th century.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
Is cable television the next media to die?
Is it just me, or is there nothing on cable, no movies worth watching at all - is cable television the next media to die?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| April 14, 2009 12:32 AM | view on twitter |
This year alone, I've already canceled my Sirius subscription. $12 a month may not seem like a lot to most people, but when the provider removes value to me - like taking channels from the genre I like and giving the bandwidth to an XM channel post merger, I called it quits.
Cable was the only option for me until 1994, when DBS became affordable enough to purchase and install for the regular people. I dumped cable in 1994 because the lines in my neighborhood were 13+ years old at the time, and every-single-time it rained, I'd have to deal with picture quality issues until the weather was warm enough to dry the lines again. With that type of wonkyness, there was no way I'd even think about using cable for internet in my area.
Satellite is this/close to being the next item I chop from the budget. Because I'm 20 miles from most of the transmitters in Chicago, it's reasonable to assume I can install a decent antenna on the roof (wow - remember those!?) and get over the air uncompressed (no MPEG4 recompression by the DBS provider) HD programming.
The real kick in the (male reproductive organ) this year was when I received a notice on the 5th of March, dated on the 4th of March, and postmarked on the 3rd of March notifying me that they were again going to raise my rates on the 1st of the month of March. That's low - sending mail 4 days after you've raised the rates to tell me "we're going to raise the rates". Why even bother wasting paper and postage to tell me what you've already done?
I don't bother with premium channels or pay-per-view, since the extra $8-$14 per month isn't sometime I value. IF, and this is a big IF, IF I wanted to see an un-cut un-edited-for-television movie, I can rent it from Lackluster or via online delivery.
Subscription based services will decline this year IMHO because more and more people will start wondering why they need to pay for what they don't want and the programs they do want are available by alternative means - both legally and illegally.
Permalink | Report
Did you ask this question via Twitter?
We create a Mahalo account for everyone who asks a question via Twitter.
Claim your Mahalo account
We create a Mahalo account for everyone who asks a question via Twitter.
Claim your Mahalo account
Other Answers (3)
April 14, 2009 12:07 AM
| view on twitter
I cannot stand watching TV anymore. I get sick of watching commercials. If there is a program I want to watch, I will set the DVR. When my girlfriend records a two hour episode of American Idol it can be watched in around an hour and fifteen minutes. The only reason I still have cable is for sporting events. Thanks to the internet, everything else that I want to watch, is available there. And if there are 30 second ads, I will check my email in that short time.
With the recent tiered pricing involving broadband internet, where the heck is tiered pricing for cable? Why can't I pay for certain stations that I watch, why should we have to pay for all these extra channels? The cable companies are probably pissed when people use their broadband to watch shows that were on cable from other places, like Hulu.
I believe much more can be learned from various internet sources. The news is actually breaking. We can find out a lot in real time rather than waiting for the story on the 5pm news. With the introduction of HD movies to the iTunes store, I am getting closer and closer to canceling that cable.
Permalink | Report
April 14, 2009 12:18 AM
| view on twitter
I don't think that it's the very NEXT media to die. However, I think it's days have been numbered since TiVo.
You're right in that there is a larger variety of content available online and it is all available "on demand". However, there is a very significant number of people in North America who don't know how to watch TV online, let alone have high speed internet or sufficient bandwidth to stream or download large television and movies.
We've had a heck of a time transitioning to HDTV that is in contrast, a lot easier than a complete nationwide switch to online television and movie distribution.
It will be a glorious day for the Interwebs when this happens though.
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: philipy
April 14, 2009 02:23 AM
| view on twitter
At the present broadband speeds? Not a chance. Sports, sports, sports. Video news. Anything live. Few areas have the necessary broadband speed.
I think it is magazines. Wired seems so 20th century.
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: masontx
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- ambi60, November 10, 2009 07:24 AM
- facebookchips, November 10, 2009 07:18 AM
- slyguy121, November 10, 2009 07:05 AM
- sajiddewan, November 10, 2009 07:03 AM
- teardropsmile, November 10, 2009 06:54 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More