2 years, 6 months ago
Tommy Hanson finished 3rd for NL Rookie of The Year. Anyone think he should have won?
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$1 Answer
Admittedly, I thought that JA Happ should have had it, Chris Coghlan only hit 9 homers and drove in 43 runs, that is not impressive at all. He did hit 321 which was good, but come on, 9 homers and 43 runs driven in should not be the numbers won by the rookie of the year. JA Happ pitched in a really tough division in terms of their hitters and he had an ERA of 2.93 and 12 wins which was very impressive. Tommy Hansen was great as well, with 2.89 ERA and 11 wins and 4 losses. However I felt that JA Happ was more of a impact for his team as the Phillies was able to win their division and go to the World Series.
images:
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
I agree. I'm a Phillies fan so might be biased, but i've seen Happ pitch all year and he was a major contributor in heping the Phillies get to their 2nd straight World Series.