Can you imagine the domain name issues? One of these times, look in the phonebook for a Mike Smith, or other common name...then multiply that by 50 states. It would have to be accessed via their SSN, or some other method which could be individualized a little easier.
Now, the next and maybe bigger question. Yes, there are a huge number of people born without a web presence. There's a huge number of people born who will never have adequate access to technology. And, there are a number of people who are born, in some of the more impoverished areas of the country, without access to electricity and running water, nevermind the internet. It think if your looking to mandate something like this, then there really needs to be a push to figure out how to make it truly accessible to everyone. Funding for libraries and school computers, even in rural areas...school-books that aren't 20 years outdated...or more importantly, some form of hope. If not, then you will leave droves of people even further behind, and that is what will eventually cause the bust of the tech-bubble.
Source(s):
My own $0.02

Permalink | Report

This question has multiple parts that I want to address separately.

Do you believe that people should be born with a domain name so that everyone is on the Internet when they are born?

Such is most easily accomplished if the domain name resolved against a Social Insurance Number (Canada) or Social Security Number (US). Not all nations have such systems, though, which would make such resolution biased to the west.

Do you believe that everyone's birth certificate should somehow be accessed on the Internet?

No.

Why or why not?

While it might not allow for identity theft of people with "born digital" birth certificates, differing levels of quality in digitizing records would make such possible for earlier records.

What would be the benefits of being able to securely access your birth certificate on the Internet?

I cannot quite think of any. Unless I have a physical certified copy for various purposes such as applying for a driver's license or passport, it would be nice but impractical.

Why do you believe it's 2009, and we still have people that are born without a presence on the Internet?

This world is fallen and not perfect. In some situations, having an Internet presence is hardly essential. In the Pacific Rim where bandwidth is fairly limited, the Internet is a quite ancillary part of life if it is even present at all. Considering that American Samoa, a United States territory, has only a T-1 line link to the outside world with less than half of the link devoted to uses beyond government and telemedicine, people are still more likely to have a shortwave radio than an Internet connection.

Do you think this will ever happen?

No. Look at the nightmare of the Digital Television transition. If we cannot get that executed effectively without excessive fear, uncertainty, and doubt then something like this is beyond bureaucracy's capability.

Is there a way for the government to mandate this in the future?

No, not in a manner that would equally serve all Americans.
Source(s):
I served as an academic librarian in American Samoa at a government-run educational institution. I coped with only having dial-up speeds ranging between 26k and 31k being routinely possible.

Permalink | Report