Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.
Next Question

Answered Question

 
February 10, 2009 09:11 PM

Do you think motocross should be regulated so no one attempts dangerous stunts like this?

Motocross cyclist Jeremy Lusk was killed following a crash while attempting a "Hart Attack" backflip.
Interesting Question?  Yes (0)   No (0)   
RSS
 
 

Best Answer  Chosen by Asker

 
February 11, 2009 06:20 AM
This is an extraordinarily complex question. Here is your question, abstracted of particulars:

"Should (a) society regulate behavior which is potentially injurious to it's citizens?"

Which doesn't have one answer, but as many replies as lawyers can conjure up- which is possibly limitless. This asks us to narrow the question for tighter surety- how about the group aspect, for starters... who should be regulated by whom? Are you asking that it be regulated at the professional level, or the civil level?

certainly any parent which actively encourages a child to take potentially debilitating or lethal risk is obviously negligent, but if that individual is of their own legal volition, what is the state to say what you can do with your possessions on your land, short of injuring other people or assembling legal items into illegal ones? And, regulation of a motor sports exhibition seems silly, as the point of the exhibition is innovation and risk, which is the performers personal prerogative to do with whatever he wants.

You may actually find that there is much more regulation than you realize in these events- Engine size, equipment requirements, vehicle weight minimums, all may play a part in trying to keep what the riders are expecting of themselves in check and try to keep things both safe and thrilling for the paying customer. If racing and stunts were safe and easy, it wouldn't be a particularly compelling viewing- or commercial- experience.

Yes, drugs are apparently illegal for many of the same reasons of personal risk, but there is the inherent economic nightmare that large scale illegal trades bring- this is part of the spirit of that group of laws. Conversely, Suz, Kaw, Honda and Yam spend lots of money on all kinds of legal defense and lobby to assure their marketplace.

Risk is inherent to existence, and some say proportional. For those who live on, and for, risks, society has sanctioned regulations on those behaviors which are engaged in complex dependency, such as a financial captain or a military general, but the spirit of liberty exists on in Darwin's favorites, the personal or exhibitionist thrill seeker.
Asker's Rating:


Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)    Tip norcaltuna for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 

Other Answers (3)

Sort By
 
February 10, 2009 11:39 PM
No, It's just not all riders can make all the tricks that are available to do. He could have had the wrong bike for the trick, or anything could have went wrong. All riders who get on a bike, know for a fact performing stunts can injure or kill them, so he was probably aware that he messed up.
Source(s):
Family motocross rider.


Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)    Tip cee-jay for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
February 12, 2009 02:59 PM
nope.

people participate willingly so they take these risks willingly. and regulation won't stop it anyhow. guys are always gonna try stuff.

people need to accept responsibility for their actions and not expect goverments or whoever to hold their hands.

i do jumps and stuff on my dirtbike all the time. i have cracked up a lotta times....and hurt myself a bit also. no one's fault but mine. i chose to do it.

Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)    Tip haidaboy for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
May 19, 2009 05:04 PM
One things for sure, I'm personally not willing to grant the government that sort of power for principled reasons. Besides, it's beyond the competency of the government to regulate such behaviors. Often MX riders are out in the desert or on someone's private property when they practice. No politician is about to pass legislation that forces DNR officials to distinguish legal free style motocross tricks from illegal ones.

As far as having regulatory bodies (funded by the organizer) at freestyle competitions to limit and penalize riders who perform barred tricks, I doubt any promoter would do this because it would negatively effect spectator turnout. Another promoter would just come along and promote events that didn't have any restrictions, which fans would then be drawn to in greater numbers. As the sport evolves, riskier and riskier tricks are going to be more and more common (and easier). Imposing restrictions would hinder the evolution of the sport which could possibly result in its extinction. Riders are already limited by the laws of physics and eventually they will no longer be able to consistently perform unique tricks (tricks that are drastically different from other ones, just not small variations). The sport will eventually plateau and fans will lose interest since they will see the same thing over and over (unlike racing, where the main focus of the competition is measured in relation to the other riders, not primarily focused on the individuals tricks). Other freestyle sports (BMX, skateboarding, etc.) are not as limited by the laws of physics since they are smaller and lighter. But unfortunately, freestyle MX involves large, heavy motocross bikes and the range of aerial maneuvering is greatly limited. I doubt any promoter would allow restrictions on an already inherently restricted sport.

I'm worried about the safety of the riders as well. But motocross, supercross, and freestyle (along with all extreme sports) are inherently dangerous, with fans and riders alike fully aware of the potential physical and mortal risks. We should allow them the full freedom to partake in a sport that they love to compete and express themselves in without any regulations on what they can and cannot do (as far as tricks go). However, one could implement regulations that doesn't bear on the actual tricks, but decreases injury, such as making it mandatory that all riders wear a neck brace. This would encourage companies to spend more money investing in improving neck braces i.e. making them safer and lighter, customizing them for each rider, etc.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip mikegullion for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 

Answer this Question

How tips and payments work

This question has already been resolved. You may add an answer to it but you will not be eligible to win best answer or any associated tips.

Ask a Question


140 characters left
Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • buddawiggi
    buddawiggi
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    27184 Points
    M$783.09 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt
    4186 Points
    M$192.17 Earned
  • annelisle
    annelisle
    Purple Belt
    2726 Points
    M$82.97 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1610)
iphone(464)
music(459)
google(357)
food(320)
online(295)
beer(279)
money(262)
movies(255)
apple(251)
aotd(235)
health(219)
video(207)
dog(205)
free(203)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members

  • bao1234, November 28, 2009 08:23 AM
  • jamessbg, November 28, 2009 08:10 AM
  • tshombe, November 28, 2009 08:00 AM
  • ponting, November 28, 2009 07:57 AM
  • ujjwal, November 28, 2009 07:37 AM

 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.