answered question
answers (1)
Hmm... given that I've seen how fame is a forgetful hussy, I'd choose life over fame. I know a few people who were famous, and in the end they all agreed that the perks were fun, but that on certain other levels it was incredibly intrusive on their personal freedom of choice, plus it didn't help them nearly as much as they thought it should to get a good life-long mate. Lot's of affairs, but not a mate.
In terms of life or weath: Given how we don't live forever, I'd choose wealth, unless the option was more specifically defined as: 1) wealth with a finite life, or 2) modest means with an immortal life, in which case I'd go for the (immortal) life.
In terms of life or weath: Given how we don't live forever, I'd choose wealth, unless the option was more specifically defined as: 1) wealth with a finite life, or 2) modest means with an immortal life, in which case I'd go for the (immortal) life.
Voted as best: ewpldf, buddawiggi
Related questions
140 characters left
ask any question
