answered question

answers (2)

rickg
0
Votes
BEST ANSWER  decided by votes   |  rickg  |  April 13, 2009 11:11 PM
The problem, it seems to me, is deciding what "creating peace" means, and then properly pricing the incentives.

If we, for example, simply pay people not to fight, it's quite difficult to tell if it's any different from paying protection money to extortionists.

On the other hand, the conditions for peace (prosperity, or at least general lack of scarcity of necessities, etc) don't really need additional incentives, it seems to me. They either happen on their own, or there is some concerted public and/or private effort to produce them, which doesn't really need any specific "creating peace" incentives.
source(s):
IMHO

Voted as best: roybott, bbrookin, thekid
Comment
hishaman
0
Votes
hishaman  |  April 13, 2009 09:35 PM
I like your idea!

but I am so sorry to say that the War will never End one day!
source(s):
Juts by looking to the History!
Comment

Voted "No best answer": philipy,


140

ask any question

Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars
WITH CREDIT CARD OR PAYPAL

Please log in to use this function.