Q: How weak is the European Shield?

A: Withough the US, the European Shield is still based on nuclear defenses of Britian and France, both of which have enough nuclear weaponry to seriously flatten all parts of Russia that matter if it ever came down to that.

Q: What is preventing a Russian Invasion in Poland and Czechoslovakia?

A: Lost petroleum sales.

Q: How much Russian build up has occurred along the European borders?

A: You mean how much Russian reduction of buildup has occured along the European borders since the end of the Cold War?

A lot. Many of their generals made some quick cash buy selling off all the hardware that was to be used against NATO in the event of a third-world war to arms dealers who peddled it off to those bottom-feeding scum-sucking despots in Africa. $35 billion of arms sales to arms dealers from just the stockpiles in the Ukraine alone.

What Russia *has* done is borrow a trick from NATO, which is to replace waves of tanks with handsfull of small, powerfull tactical missiles.

Remember, NATO started the "arms race", with what was originally supposed to be a cost-saving measure, namely, instead of station millions of troops facing the Soviets, they'd have a few hundred thousand, and then suplement those with tactical nuclear missiles, such that if the Soviet's attacked, it was NATO policy to be the first ones to use nukes to strike against waves of inbound Soviet tanks.

Now, the Russians have developed a non-nuclear implosion bomb that kicks as much punch as a small nuke, but it's not nuclear, and they're lining their borders with those, pointed at places that are likely to become tactical theaters if anyone were to attack them.

Asker's Rating:

Permalink | Report