Next Question
RSS
I like TweetDeck for several reasons:
I use a large wide screen monitor, and when I maximize TweetDeck it feels like I have some sort of communication command center. I like to let it completely take over my screen. The column sizes and formatting of TweetDeck crams a lot of info on my screen at the same time, so I can quickly scan everything with minimal scrolling. For me, this makes it easier to follow lots of people and still watch a couple of active searches. (I tend to either be focusing on Twitter or ignore it; I don't typically work on stuff and leave it open beside my other windows.)
TweetDeck makes it easy to do a lot of things with a single button (the gears button):
*follow and unfollow
*view a user profile
*reply to all people mentioned in a tweet
* perform a search
*manipulate group membership
*favorite a tweet
*email a tweet
*translate a tweet into English
*Mark a tweet as read (or even delete it from your list).
*extract the link from a tweet and add it to your tweet/status bar
*block a user
*report a tweet as spam AND block the user
TweetDeck also has a few other things that I didn't notice in Twhirl (older version):
*recent hashtag button to auto-insert your recently used tags into a tweet
*1-click access to trends for any column
*Access to Trends/Local Trends via TwitScoop
*Counter to track how many times you are mentioned (if you even care)
*An iPhone version that can sync with the desktop version
I also really like TweetDeck's dark background with light text. This is how I usually customize applications whenever possible because it is easier on my eyes. I feel like I'm looking into a light bulb when I spend a lot of time reading on a white background, even though that seems to be the de facto standard.
I think what it comes down to is how you want to use Twitter:
If you want a "command center" style of view and are willing to give TweetDeck a lot of screen real estate and RAM, go with it.
If you want a smaller IM-like view or access to some of the specific features that Twhirl has and TweetDeck lacks (Ping.fm, Jaiku and spell check), choose Twhirl.
PS:
I prefer TweetDeck over Seesmic too. It can do more with fewer clicks, is easier to add people to groups, shows more tweets in the same amount of column length/height, and gives access to trends and translation.
Source(s):
Extensive use of multiple versions of TweetDeck, and a short trial use of Twhirl and Seesmic
Tags: tweetdeck, twitter, seesmic, twhirl
Helpful Answer?
(2)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
TweetDeck is a very good and complete client, but I just don't like the design.
Twhirl is very good, but I need more information.
That's is why I choose Seesmic it gives me a lot of information and also has a nice design :)
Source(s):
http://seesmic.com/
Tags: twitter, facebook, internet
Helpful Answer?
(3)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
1. It is free
2. It works really well so far for me - but I am a newer iPhone user...
I will likely try another app some time - but I really enjoy the idea of a free one - until I see the need for something more robust, I plan to stick with this one.
It has plenty of options (font size, settings), so except for one ad space at the top, it's great.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1.35
September 04, 2009 06:31 PM
TweetDeck or Twhirl? Which do you use and why?
TweetDeck or Twhirl? Or something else entirely?
Whch do you prefer and why?
Please tell us personal experience and your own reasons.
I've already read Mashable et al reviews and don't need them repeated here.
Whch do you prefer and why?
Please tell us personal experience and your own reasons.
I've already read Mashable et al reviews and don't need them repeated here.
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| September 04, 2009 10:53 PM |
I use a large wide screen monitor, and when I maximize TweetDeck it feels like I have some sort of communication command center. I like to let it completely take over my screen. The column sizes and formatting of TweetDeck crams a lot of info on my screen at the same time, so I can quickly scan everything with minimal scrolling. For me, this makes it easier to follow lots of people and still watch a couple of active searches. (I tend to either be focusing on Twitter or ignore it; I don't typically work on stuff and leave it open beside my other windows.)
TweetDeck makes it easy to do a lot of things with a single button (the gears button):
*follow and unfollow
*view a user profile
*reply to all people mentioned in a tweet
* perform a search
*manipulate group membership
*favorite a tweet
*email a tweet
*translate a tweet into English
*Mark a tweet as read (or even delete it from your list).
*extract the link from a tweet and add it to your tweet/status bar
*block a user
*report a tweet as spam AND block the user
TweetDeck also has a few other things that I didn't notice in Twhirl (older version):
*recent hashtag button to auto-insert your recently used tags into a tweet
*1-click access to trends for any column
*Access to Trends/Local Trends via TwitScoop
*Counter to track how many times you are mentioned (if you even care)
*An iPhone version that can sync with the desktop version
I also really like TweetDeck's dark background with light text. This is how I usually customize applications whenever possible because it is easier on my eyes. I feel like I'm looking into a light bulb when I spend a lot of time reading on a white background, even though that seems to be the de facto standard.
I think what it comes down to is how you want to use Twitter:
If you want a "command center" style of view and are willing to give TweetDeck a lot of screen real estate and RAM, go with it.
If you want a smaller IM-like view or access to some of the specific features that Twhirl has and TweetDeck lacks (Ping.fm, Jaiku and spell check), choose Twhirl.
PS:
I prefer TweetDeck over Seesmic too. It can do more with fewer clicks, is easier to add people to groups, shows more tweets in the same amount of column length/height, and gives access to trends and translation.
Source(s):
Extensive use of multiple versions of TweetDeck, and a short trial use of Twhirl and Seesmic
| Asker's Rating: |
• Very detailed answer, thanks!
Tags: tweetdeck, twitter, seesmic, twhirl
Helpful Answer?
(2)
(0)
Helpful: philipy, buddawiggi
Tip ewpldf for this answerOther Answers (3)
September 04, 2009 06:57 PM
I would choose Seesmic, I dont know why but I like Seesmic a lot more it's like having the best from Twhirl and TweetDeck together in a single client :) TweetDeck is a very good and complete client, but I just don't like the design.
Twhirl is very good, but I need more information.
That's is why I choose Seesmic it gives me a lot of information and also has a nice design :)
Source(s):
http://seesmic.com/
Tags: twitter, facebook, internet
Helpful Answer?
(3)
(0)
Helpful: philipy, easyeboy, buddawiggi
Tip lobo7922 for this answer
September 04, 2009 08:13 PM
I would agree - Seesmic is running perfectly at the moment. I have been noticing that Tweetdeck is not retrieving 10-15% of my tweets.
Report
September 06, 2009 10:28 PM
I'm trying Seesmic and liking it.
The design is nice and it can link to my bit.ly account, which is a problem with TweetDeck.
On the minus side it's horrible that the only way to select the members of a group is to go find tweets by every member you want and then click through several steps to add them (gear, user, add-to-group, select group, ok). That's something TweetDeck handles much better as you can just check boxes in the list of people you follow.
Also TweetDeck has an iPhone app, while Seesmic's is still "coming soon".
Why can we so rarely have the best of worlds when it comes to software? :)
The things that are lacking in each would be a piece of cake to add.
Report
The design is nice and it can link to my bit.ly account, which is a problem with TweetDeck.
On the minus side it's horrible that the only way to select the members of a group is to go find tweets by every member you want and then click through several steps to add them (gear, user, add-to-group, select group, ok). That's something TweetDeck handles much better as you can just check boxes in the list of people you follow.
Also TweetDeck has an iPhone app, while Seesmic's is still "coming soon".
Why can we so rarely have the best of worlds when it comes to software? :)
The things that are lacking in each would be a piece of cake to add.
September 04, 2009 07:29 PM
I use Twitterific because... 1. It is free
2. It works really well so far for me - but I am a newer iPhone user...
I will likely try another app some time - but I really enjoy the idea of a free one - until I see the need for something more robust, I plan to stick with this one.
It has plenty of options (font size, settings), so except for one ad space at the top, it's great.
Permalink | Report
September 04, 2009 07:40 PM
I was asking about desktop apps there, though TweetDeck has an iPhone app too. I agree Twitterific is a good choice for iPhone.
Report
September 05, 2009 09:48 AM
I used to use Tweetdeck as I believed it was one of the best Twitter clients available. The problem with Tweetdeck is that I find it to consume too much memory. While I still use it, I have recently switched to Hootsuite which is web based. It handles multiple accounts far better than Tweetdeck and Twhirl.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- sexiipepsii67, December 09, 2009 09:48 PM
- lorrieloving, December 09, 2009 09:44 PM
- diransom, December 09, 2009 09:38 PM
- nathansamlaska, December 09, 2009 09:27 PM
- navin_katesaria..., December 09, 2009 09:27 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
http://tweetdeck.posterous.com/tweetdeck-v0206-pre-release
http://tweetdeck.com/beta/
And the ability to see tag cloud for column and to filter a column easily is very nice.