Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.
Next Question

Question

 
M$1 June 18, 2009 03:52 PM

Do you think it is OK for the Social Security to pay full benefits to divorced women when the ex dies?

If a woman is married to a man for 10 years at any time in his life, when she retires, she gets a check equal to 50% of his benefit, and when he passes, she gets 100% AND there could be as many as 5 of these ex wives being paid!!!

Also do you think an ex should have to prove they lived together? (I ask this in regard to women who married just to be covered when they themselves grew old. They never really were wives, just married on paper get the benefits later on.)
Interesting Question?  Yes (0)   No (0)   
Email to a friend | RSS
 
 

 
   No Best Answer Selected, Tip Refunded
 
 


Answers (3)

Sort By
 
June 18, 2009 04:00 PM
If the amount of social security a woman can collect based on her own earnings record is lower than that of her ex-spouse, it is probably because she put her career on hold to support him in his career while raising their children. If her benefits were higher, she'd be collecting on her own earnings history-- so this provision in the law is designed to protect women.

I think it is absolutely appropriate.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip ssmacd for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
June 18, 2009 07:47 PM
You are assuming the women are heterosexuals, or mothers, or could have earned as much as a man if they'd stayed working, That is assuming a LOT!!

And if a 57 year old woman married a man she is not in love with, is not living with, is not having kids with, is not heterosexual, is not having sex with him... and THEN collects 100% of his social security when he dies? Whom is that protecting?

Report
 
 
 
June 18, 2009 05:15 PM
No, nor do I think it is appropriate for ese students who intentionally act like they're complete morons so they can collect SSI benefits.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip andreww for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
June 18, 2009 07:48 PM
I would suppose they are morons if they think they can live on less than 700 a month..lol... or cheat and not have to pay it all back,,

Report
 
 
 
June 18, 2009 05:22 PM
I guess, the social security should not be paid for people married on paper. There should be some kind of regulations to make sure, people getting it are actually needed the benefit and really qualify to get it.

Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)   

Helpful: beast1oh1

Tip pellrider for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
June 18, 2009 07:54 PM
Retirement Social Security is not based on need. It is an entitlement.

Report
 
 
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • buddawiggi
    buddawiggi
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    28354 Points
    M$813.91 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt with a Brown Tip
    5119 Points
    M$210.34 Earned
  • annelisle
    annelisle
    Purple Belt
    3596 Points
    M$110.02 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1703)
music(484)
iphone(476)
google(372)
food(331)
online(305)
beer(282)
money(276)
movies(268)
apple(255)
aotd(235)
health(224)
video(212)
free(210)
dog(206)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members


 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.