Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M$4.25 Funded By Mahalo ? |
October 30, 2009 12:19 PM
RSS
Fossil fuels are those created over millions of years by time and pressure from buried plant material. They are hydrocarbons and when burned produce CO2, which in turn contributes to global warming.
They include oil (petroleum), coal, and gas (natural).
The distinction between fossil fuels and other hydrocarbon fuels such as wood, charcoal, and ethanol is that those other fuels involve carbon that circulates between living things and the atmosphere, while fossil fuels involve carbon that has been buried in the earth for millions of years and is now being set free in the atmosphere.
Source(s):
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Fossil+fuels
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/index.html
http://www.greenfuels.org/
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
E.g. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fossil%20fuel
Permalink | Report
-quote-
"Fossil fuels or mineral fuels are fuels formed by natural resources such as anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms. The age of the organisms and their resulting fossil fuels is typically millions of years, and sometimes exceeds 650 million years. These fuels contain high percentage of carbon and hydrocarbons.
Fossil fuels range from volatile materials with low carbon:hydrogen ratios like methane, to liquid petroleum to nonvolatile materials composed of almost pure carbon, like anthracite coal. Methane can be found in hydrocarbon fields, alone, associated with oil, or in the form of methane clathrates. It is generally accepted that they formed from the fossilized remains of dead plants and animals by exposure to heat and pressure in the Earth's crust over hundreds of millions of years. This biogenic theory was first introduced by Georg Agricola in 1556 and later by Mikhail Lomonosov in the 18th century."
-end of quote-
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
www.epa.gov/greenpower/pubs/glossary.htm
Permalink | Report
In both cases, what they have in common is that there was no oxygen for the organism to decompose all the way.
For billions of years organisms have been dieing in water, or dieing close to water and falling it, whereupon sometimes it sinks to the bottom and gets covered with mud fast enough that oxygen doesn't have a chance to get at it.
The mud then gets covered by more mud, and eventually gets pressed into shales, and then as the tectonic plates of the earth's crust push and grind against each other that shale gets rolled up and folded and kneaded like puff pastry with lots of shortening, such that like puff-pastry which has little pockets of shorting all through it, so also the earth's crust has little pockets of unoxidized hydrocarbons and methane all through it.
Because those hydrocarbons and methane were incompletely oxidized, if you can find some, and trigger it with a bit of heat, like from a spark, then, if there's oxygen, it will jump an activation energy hurdle and quickly complete the oxidization process all the way to water, nitrates, and carbon dioxide, releasing lots of stored chemical bond energy in the process... called "burning".
Humans were already accustomed to burning wood, and when they discovered that they could also burn those incompletely oxidized hydrocarbons and methane found in pockets in the earth's crust, they called the hydrocarbons coal and oil, and they called the methane natural-gas.
Because those hydrocarbons and natural gas came from organisms that had been alive but were then quickly covered in mud before oxygen could oxidize their bodies completely, sometimes, if those organisms also had a shell, that shell would leave an imprint in the mud, and we call those imprints fossils.
Animals bodies are what became oil, and so we often find animal fossils around oil, and plants became coal, so we often find leaf-fossils in coal. Both made natural-gas from the un-oxidized nitrogen in their proteins.
Because wherever people find pockets of coal, oil and natural-gas they also often find fossils, they have nicknamed coal, oil, and natural gas "fossil fuels".
Permalink | Report
This is an important question, particularly because many experts are arguing that it is OK to use biomass as a fuel, but not fossil fuels. But if fossil fuels come mainly from plant biomass in the first place, what is the difference?
The difference has a lot to do with time scale. The atmosphere contains a certain amount of CO2, and global warming is happening because that amount is increasing. Why is it increasing? The experts say because we are burning too much fossil fuels. So why is it ok to use biomass for fuel? The basic idea with biomass fuel is that it comes from plants that were grown specifically to produce the fuel. So although biomass fuels release the same CO2 that fossil fuels do when they are combusted, all of that CO2 was taken up CO2 by the plants when they were grown to produce the biomass. We can think of this as "paying in advance" for the CO2 that is emitted. Fossil fuels also came originally from plants, so the CO2 emitted from burning fossil fuels also is CO2 that was originally taken up from the atmosphere by plants. But this was done over a long long period of time - millions of years. And now we are pumping all of that CO2 back into the atmosphere in less than 100 years. That is why we are seeing the sharp increase of CO2 concentration that scientists have been tracking and people like Al Gore have been bringing to the popular media.
I hope that you find this answer useful.
Source(s):
I used to teach and do research related to this stuff, so my source is just what I was able to pull out of my head. :-)
Permalink | Report
Fossil fuels principally consist of carbon and hydrogen bonds, in short, the remains gradually get transformed into Hydrocarbons.
The fossil fuels are formed as a result of accumulating sediment layers. As the sediment layers go on adding over years, there is an increase in temperature as well as pressure and after hundreds of years due to these physical conditions the organic materials get transformed into
hydrocarbons.
The most commonly used fossil fuels are petroleum, coal, diesel and natural gas. These substances are extracted from the earth’s crust and, if necessary, refined into suitable fuel products.
The reason these fossil fuels are used is that they produce significant amount of energy. The most commonly used fossil fuels are natural gas, coal, petroleum..which we use on a larger extent.
Fossil fuels are non-renewable resources i.e., these are natural resources which cannot be regenerated and are exhausted when once used. They take millions of years to form, and reserves get depleted much faster until the ones are formed.
Also, since that fossil fuels are non renewable resources, many alternatives are now been used like hydroelectric energy, geothermal energy, solar energy, wind energy, etc. which can be made available in abundance and the fossil fuels are also used in a limit.
Hope this helps a bit.
Thanks.
Source(s):
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761586407/Fossil_Fuels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel
http://www.lenntech.com/greenhouse-effect/fossil-fuels.htm
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
http://www.examville.com
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
What are fossil fuels?
- In Science & Mathematics |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| October 30, 2009 12:38 PM |
They include oil (petroleum), coal, and gas (natural).
The distinction between fossil fuels and other hydrocarbon fuels such as wood, charcoal, and ethanol is that those other fuels involve carbon that circulates between living things and the atmosphere, while fossil fuels involve carbon that has been buried in the earth for millions of years and is now being set free in the atmosphere.
Source(s):
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Fossil+fuels
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/index.html
http://www.greenfuels.org/
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (7)
October 30, 2009 12:33 PM
Fuels such as petroleum (and thus gasoline or diesel), coal, and natural gas, which are derived from remains of prehistoric vegetation and animals are called fossil fuels.
Source(s):
E.g. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fossil%20fuel
Permalink | Report
October 30, 2009 12:37 PM
Fossil fuels or mineral fuels are fuels formed by natural resources such as anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms. -quote-
"Fossil fuels or mineral fuels are fuels formed by natural resources such as anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms. The age of the organisms and their resulting fossil fuels is typically millions of years, and sometimes exceeds 650 million years. These fuels contain high percentage of carbon and hydrocarbons.
Fossil fuels range from volatile materials with low carbon:hydrogen ratios like methane, to liquid petroleum to nonvolatile materials composed of almost pure carbon, like anthracite coal. Methane can be found in hydrocarbon fields, alone, associated with oil, or in the form of methane clathrates. It is generally accepted that they formed from the fossilized remains of dead plants and animals by exposure to heat and pressure in the Earth's crust over hundreds of millions of years. This biogenic theory was first introduced by Georg Agricola in 1556 and later by Mikhail Lomonosov in the 18th century."
-end of quote-
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: chriswingate
October 30, 2009 03:00 PM
Fossil fuels are the nation’s principal source of electricity. Fossil fuels come in three major forms: coal, oil, and natural gas. Because fossil fuels are a finite resource and cannot be replenished once they are extracted and burned, they are not considered renewable.
Source(s):
www.epa.gov/greenpower/pubs/glossary.htm
Permalink | Report
October 30, 2009 07:04 PM
If a living organism dies and gets covered up by mud or dust quickly enough for oxygen to not be able to decompose it completely into water, nitrates, and carbon dioxide, then the organism will only partially decompose into hydrocarbons (oil) and methane (natural gas). In both cases, what they have in common is that there was no oxygen for the organism to decompose all the way.
For billions of years organisms have been dieing in water, or dieing close to water and falling it, whereupon sometimes it sinks to the bottom and gets covered with mud fast enough that oxygen doesn't have a chance to get at it.
The mud then gets covered by more mud, and eventually gets pressed into shales, and then as the tectonic plates of the earth's crust push and grind against each other that shale gets rolled up and folded and kneaded like puff pastry with lots of shortening, such that like puff-pastry which has little pockets of shorting all through it, so also the earth's crust has little pockets of unoxidized hydrocarbons and methane all through it.
Because those hydrocarbons and methane were incompletely oxidized, if you can find some, and trigger it with a bit of heat, like from a spark, then, if there's oxygen, it will jump an activation energy hurdle and quickly complete the oxidization process all the way to water, nitrates, and carbon dioxide, releasing lots of stored chemical bond energy in the process... called "burning".
Humans were already accustomed to burning wood, and when they discovered that they could also burn those incompletely oxidized hydrocarbons and methane found in pockets in the earth's crust, they called the hydrocarbons coal and oil, and they called the methane natural-gas.
Because those hydrocarbons and natural gas came from organisms that had been alive but were then quickly covered in mud before oxygen could oxidize their bodies completely, sometimes, if those organisms also had a shell, that shell would leave an imprint in the mud, and we call those imprints fossils.
Animals bodies are what became oil, and so we often find animal fossils around oil, and plants became coal, so we often find leaf-fossils in coal. Both made natural-gas from the un-oxidized nitrogen in their proteins.
Because wherever people find pockets of coal, oil and natural-gas they also often find fossils, they have nicknamed coal, oil, and natural gas "fossil fuels".
Permalink | Report
October 30, 2009 11:36 PM
Well *that's* a confusing "Fact Refuted"...
In the first place, the flash-animated slide show that your link points to only shows an extremely over-simplified version of just one ultra-specific and not very common way out of the many ways that plants being pressed into coal can be deposited...
And not only does it leave out the nuance of difference that happens in order for natural gas to form, which happens with coal all the time, which is why they can extract natural gas from coal beds in Wyoming...
And not only does it say nothing about oil formation...
And not only does it not show the process of sedimentary crust folding that is what happens in order to drive the pockets of coal, oil, and natural gas deep underground to where it's hot...
But it doesn't even contradict anything I said.
It's just an extremely over-simplified visualization of one very specific and not-the-most-common way for just coal formation (does not include oil and doesn't show crust folding) and it doesn't even refute what my post said!
So what are you refuting?!?
Report
In the first place, the flash-animated slide show that your link points to only shows an extremely over-simplified version of just one ultra-specific and not very common way out of the many ways that plants being pressed into coal can be deposited...
And not only does it leave out the nuance of difference that happens in order for natural gas to form, which happens with coal all the time, which is why they can extract natural gas from coal beds in Wyoming...
And not only does it say nothing about oil formation...
And not only does it not show the process of sedimentary crust folding that is what happens in order to drive the pockets of coal, oil, and natural gas deep underground to where it's hot...
But it doesn't even contradict anything I said.
It's just an extremely over-simplified visualization of one very specific and not-the-most-common way for just coal formation (does not include oil and doesn't show crust folding) and it doesn't even refute what my post said!
So what are you refuting?!?
October 31, 2009 03:30 AM
It is simple but it explains things correctly. And, you click on the choice at the top to see oil vs coal. The main thing I meant to refute was that plants became coal and animals became oil. Animals were not a significant part of either. But if you have sources for your version by all means cite them.
Here's another:
"Coal comes from the massive accumulation of dead land-based plant life, mainly trees. This organic matter was deposited in sedimentary basins on land (of continental origin), where the water was shallow." from
http://www.planete-energies.com/content/coal/formation.html
and
"Oil and gas formation begins with the accumulation of organics on the sea-floor; these are the dead remains of organisms living in the water column, such as microscopic plankton, which rain down on the sea floor below. " from http://www.discoveringfossils.co.uk/fossilfuels.htm
The basic difference then is sea vs land and not animal vs plant.
Report
Here's another:
"Coal comes from the massive accumulation of dead land-based plant life, mainly trees. This organic matter was deposited in sedimentary basins on land (of continental origin), where the water was shallow." from
http://www.planete-energies.com/content/coal/formation.html
and
"Oil and gas formation begins with the accumulation of organics on the sea-floor; these are the dead remains of organisms living in the water column, such as microscopic plankton, which rain down on the sea floor below. " from http://www.discoveringfossils.co.uk/fossilfuels.htm
The basic difference then is sea vs land and not animal vs plant.
October 31, 2009 03:51 AM
By animal I just meant any non-photosynthetic eukaryote, which includes sponges, coelenterates, worms, mollusks, arthropods, worms, chordates yadda yadda...
That's what biologists mean when they say "animal". It's anything that's a eukaryote and which is not photosynthetic.
Most oil came from the equivalent of the krill that Blue whale's eat, and tiny coelenterates like non-sedentary non-calcifying coral, and other little animals swimming around the ocean.
You thought I was just talking about large, land based vertebrate, right?
That would be silly. Those ones are only a teeny-tiny percentage of the animal biomass that was in any position to fall to the bottom of a body of water and get covered with mud.
When I said "animal fossils are found around oil", I meant those fossils of tiny little shelled creatures like mollusks, arthropods, and some coelenterates like choral.
Report
That's what biologists mean when they say "animal". It's anything that's a eukaryote and which is not photosynthetic.
Most oil came from the equivalent of the krill that Blue whale's eat, and tiny coelenterates like non-sedentary non-calcifying coral, and other little animals swimming around the ocean.
You thought I was just talking about large, land based vertebrate, right?
That would be silly. Those ones are only a teeny-tiny percentage of the animal biomass that was in any position to fall to the bottom of a body of water and get covered with mud.
When I said "animal fossils are found around oil", I meant those fossils of tiny little shelled creatures like mollusks, arthropods, and some coelenterates like choral.
October 31, 2009 09:38 AM
Most of the replies to this question have given a basic "objective science" reply to your question, but I wonder if you are asking something more along the lines of "what are fossil fuels, and why are people making such a fuss about them now?" This is an important question, particularly because many experts are arguing that it is OK to use biomass as a fuel, but not fossil fuels. But if fossil fuels come mainly from plant biomass in the first place, what is the difference?
The difference has a lot to do with time scale. The atmosphere contains a certain amount of CO2, and global warming is happening because that amount is increasing. Why is it increasing? The experts say because we are burning too much fossil fuels. So why is it ok to use biomass for fuel? The basic idea with biomass fuel is that it comes from plants that were grown specifically to produce the fuel. So although biomass fuels release the same CO2 that fossil fuels do when they are combusted, all of that CO2 was taken up CO2 by the plants when they were grown to produce the biomass. We can think of this as "paying in advance" for the CO2 that is emitted. Fossil fuels also came originally from plants, so the CO2 emitted from burning fossil fuels also is CO2 that was originally taken up from the atmosphere by plants. But this was done over a long long period of time - millions of years. And now we are pumping all of that CO2 back into the atmosphere in less than 100 years. That is why we are seeing the sharp increase of CO2 concentration that scientists have been tracking and people like Al Gore have been bringing to the popular media.
I hope that you find this answer useful.
Source(s):
I used to teach and do research related to this stuff, so my source is just what I was able to pull out of my head. :-)
Permalink | Report
October 31, 2009 10:12 AM
Fossil Fuels are energy rich substances formed from long buried plants ,ancient organisms and microorganisms. Fossil fuels also called as 'Mineral fuels' are formed as a result of natural resources such as Anaerobic decomposition of the buried micro / macro-organisms and take centuries to form. Fossil fuels principally consist of carbon and hydrogen bonds, in short, the remains gradually get transformed into Hydrocarbons.
The fossil fuels are formed as a result of accumulating sediment layers. As the sediment layers go on adding over years, there is an increase in temperature as well as pressure and after hundreds of years due to these physical conditions the organic materials get transformed into
hydrocarbons.
The most commonly used fossil fuels are petroleum, coal, diesel and natural gas. These substances are extracted from the earth’s crust and, if necessary, refined into suitable fuel products.
The reason these fossil fuels are used is that they produce significant amount of energy. The most commonly used fossil fuels are natural gas, coal, petroleum..which we use on a larger extent.
Fossil fuels are non-renewable resources i.e., these are natural resources which cannot be regenerated and are exhausted when once used. They take millions of years to form, and reserves get depleted much faster until the ones are formed.
Also, since that fossil fuels are non renewable resources, many alternatives are now been used like hydroelectric energy, geothermal energy, solar energy, wind energy, etc. which can be made available in abundance and the fossil fuels are also used in a limit.
Hope this helps a bit.
Thanks.
Source(s):
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761586407/Fossil_Fuels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel
http://www.lenntech.com/greenhouse-effect/fossil-fuels.htm
Permalink | Report
November 02, 2009 07:53 AM
Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons, primarily coal, petroleum, fuel oil and gas. They formed from the fossilised remains of dead plants and animals by exposure to heat and pressure in the Earth's crust over hundreds of millions of years.
Source(s):
http://www.examville.com
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- mayrafernandez, December 05, 2009 03:09 PM
- easyfoodandwine, December 05, 2009 02:56 PM
- peteribuyat, December 05, 2009 02:56 PM
- kanthony46us, December 05, 2009 02:55 PM
- weightwatchersr..., December 05, 2009 02:50 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More


http://www.hk-phy.org/energy/power/source_phy/flash/formation_e.html