Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.
Next Question

Answered Question

davepamn davepamn
 

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
 M¢25  Funded By Mahalo ? |  July 13, 2009 02:06 PM

Was it possible that 2.5 MeV with the sharp peak was the correct cold fusion profile?

Maybe the assumption for the 2.5 MeV and sharp peak profile were incorrect.

Pon and Fleishmann claimed heat excess of 100 times that from any conceivable chemical reaction. 5 Mega Joules per cm^3 in 100 hours.

Could hydrogen atomic resonance synced and caused a massive spike in the watt output? Perhaps, the problem was putting fusion in the framework of conventional thought rather than studying the actual data.
Interesting Question?  Yes (0)   No (0)   
RSS
 
 

Best Answer  Chosen by Asker

stacy9499 stacy9499
 
 July 31, 2009 04:00 AM
Other scientists tried to duplicate the work but could not under the same conditions in different locations. For a successful experiment the ability to reapeat it and produce the same result is key.
Source(s):
University physics classes

Asker's Rating:
• 1. Palladium is incapable of fusion.
2. If fusion occurs in Palladium, 24 million electron volts of energy released per fusion.
3. Fusion did not happen because there was nowhere enough neutron emission levels. Radiation was low.
4. Helium 4 radiates a gamma ray of 24 MeV of energy. Watts of significant proportion would have been generated.
5. Pon and Fleischmann miscalculate the potential atmospheric pressure in the Palladium caused by electrochemistry.

However, there was evidence of heat. If fusion was not the cause of the heat. What caused the heat? What about radiate energy?


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip stacy9499 for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
davepamn davepamn
 
July 31, 2009 04:09 AM
Hutchinson and Scott started experimenting with excess heat generation. An electrochemist where in Charles Scott group reported producing 2 to 3 watts in excess heat. The rod was 3 mm diameter and 8.5 cm long palladium and the current density was 85 mm amps/cm^2. 37.6 watts in and 39 watts out.

Report
 
 

Answer this Question

How tips and payments work

This question has already been resolved. You may add an answer to it but you will not be eligible to win best answer or any associated tips.

Related Questions

No questions found.
View All Science & Mathematics Questions

Ask a Question


140 characters left
Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • buddawiggi
    buddawiggi
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    27115 Points
    M$783.09 Earned
  • kty2777
    kty2777
    Purple Belt with a Brown Tip
    5444 Points
    M$199.92 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt
    4166 Points
    M$187.17 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1597)
twitter(945)
iphone(462)
music(459)
google(355)
food(318)
internet(303)
online(294)
beer(279)
money(262)
movies(255)
facebook(254)
apple(251)
aotd(235)
answers(222)
health(217)
dog(205)
video(204)
free(202)
windows(195)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members


 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.

Answers Home | Ask a Question | Earn Points | How Tips Work | Widget