Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M¢25 Funded By Mahalo ? |
November 05, 2009 03:14 PM
RSS
Radiation very close in to the galactic center would make life as we know it on Earth impossible, though this does not say anything about the development of other life forms. Farther out from the galactic center there is still an enormous number of stars, around many of which it is possible that planets exist in the range of distances from their primary that would allow the development of life as we know it.
Gamma-Ray Bursts, or GRBs, are the result of a particular sort of supernova, ending the main life-cycle of especially massive stars (see e.g. http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/bursts.html for more information). Since most of the radiation from GRBs comes out in a highly collimated pair of beams, it is unlikely for GRB radiation to hit any particular star's vicinity. The danger is somewhat higher in a galactic neighborhood with an especially high fraction of the right type of massive stars, but even then, since GRBs are relatively rare, the overall likelihood of a GRB ending life in a particular system within a particular year, millennium, or even 100,000 year stretch is infinitesimally small.
The bottom line is that the solar system's galactic location is not especially better than any number of other stars' locations, and GRBs are not a major source of danger compared to many other potentially civilization-ending, or even life-ending cosmic cataclysms possible.
Permalink | Report
Realize, life as we know it (humans, animals, plants) is a very limited definition. It's altogether possible Mars holds life that we have failed to recognize.
Source(s):
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/24/BAG33PE14U26.DT...
Permalink | Report
-quote-
"This protected location is truly exceptional. Not all spiral galaxies are like the Milky Way. In the vast majority, the co-rotation distance and the habitable zone fail to overlap. Not only is there a match for the Milky Way Galaxy, but also the best possible place for a newly forming planetary system to accumulate all the heavy elements and long-lived radioactive isotopes requires for advanced life happens to lie just inside the co-rotation distance."
-end of quote-
Source(s):
http://www.thedesignoflife.net/blog/Does-our-solar-system-occupy-a-unique-p...
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
Is the solar systems position in the Milk Way the best location for life?
Gamma ray bursts would destroy life. Are there other locations in the Milky where Gamma radiation would not destroy life?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
- In Science & Mathematics |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| November 05, 2009 04:42 PM |
Gamma-Ray Bursts, or GRBs, are the result of a particular sort of supernova, ending the main life-cycle of especially massive stars (see e.g. http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/bursts.html for more information). Since most of the radiation from GRBs comes out in a highly collimated pair of beams, it is unlikely for GRB radiation to hit any particular star's vicinity. The danger is somewhat higher in a galactic neighborhood with an especially high fraction of the right type of massive stars, but even then, since GRBs are relatively rare, the overall likelihood of a GRB ending life in a particular system within a particular year, millennium, or even 100,000 year stretch is infinitesimally small.
The bottom line is that the solar system's galactic location is not especially better than any number of other stars' locations, and GRBs are not a major source of danger compared to many other potentially civilization-ending, or even life-ending cosmic cataclysms possible.
| Asker's Rating: |
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (2)
November 05, 2009 03:25 PM
Science is still out on that, we have a very limited view of the whole universe, let alone our galaxy. But there is a star system we've found, Gliese 581, that holds 2 planets very likely to support life. Realize, life as we know it (humans, animals, plants) is a very limited definition. It's altogether possible Mars holds life that we have failed to recognize.
Source(s):
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/24/BAG33PE14U26.DT...
Permalink | Report
November 06, 2009 06:23 PM
Its the best possible place for a planet to accumulate all the heavy elements and long lived radioactive isotopes. -quote-
"This protected location is truly exceptional. Not all spiral galaxies are like the Milky Way. In the vast majority, the co-rotation distance and the habitable zone fail to overlap. Not only is there a match for the Milky Way Galaxy, but also the best possible place for a newly forming planetary system to accumulate all the heavy elements and long-lived radioactive isotopes requires for advanced life happens to lie just inside the co-rotation distance."
-end of quote-
Source(s):
http://www.thedesignoflife.net/blog/Does-our-solar-system-occupy-a-unique-p...
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
http://www.shnock.com/gloriana-6506/
I can ask question from twitter but is there any way to add tip ?? Help me out guys..
I'm building a new home should I install a residential Fire Sprinkler system ? The Co...
Is there any real chance New Gold Inc will be allowed to operate the Cerro San Pedro ...
I can ask question from twitter but is there any way to add tip ?? Help me out guys..
I'm building a new home should I install a residential Fire Sprinkler system ? The Co...
Is there any real chance New Gold Inc will be allowed to operate the Cerro San Pedro ...
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- lizwaldron, November 23, 2009 11:40 AM
- rominachuy, November 23, 2009 11:26 AM
- miller2009, November 23, 2009 11:23 AM
- surfyngirl, November 23, 2009 11:23 AM
- susanthawekrama..., November 23, 2009 11:10 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
If so the it would seem that gamma radiation is not the same through out the Milky Way. At way point along the path does life become impossible because of the gamma radiation?
As for your question about what level of gamma radiation makes life impossible, the answer depends on the life you refer to. It also depends on the extent of the shielding atmosphere. There have been discussions (some more tongue in cheek than others) about the possible outcome for life on Earth should there ever be a civilization-ending nuclear war. In that horrendous scenario, more primitive life (e.g. cockroaches and down) is more likely to survive than higher-order animals. In addition, to the extent that fallout does not dissipate into the depths of the oceans, and that no other disaster-causing side-effects (e.g. nuclear-winter-induced ice age that freezes the oceans to their depths) dwellers of the ocean deeps have a better chance of survival due to the shielding provided by the water above them. For unshielded humans as we are today, living under our atmosphere, a significant increase in gamma radiation from cosmic sources, unlikely as that is, would cause anywhere from a modest increase in mutation and cancer rates, to killing off humanity, depending on how much the increase is, and how rapidly it occurs.