Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M$1.00 Funded By Mahalo ? |
March 12, 2009 06:40 PM
RSS
I don't think that's happening in the near future. At least, not in this generation. Next one, maybe.
Too many in power are still extolling very draconian technological policy. They fail to grasp the full meaning, and potential, of the new technology arising. And frankly, I find their lack of faith disturbing.
This administration is starting to allow technology to do it's job. The administration has it's own blog. It's realizing that it must become transparent of it's own accord, because there's no more possibility of putting the genie back in the bottle once it's out. The internet, it's speed of transmission, and it's anonymity have destroyed the bottle.
Those who control our entertainment are slow to realize that it is beyond their control. Their most successful competitor is piracy. They fail to realize that instead of punishing lawful users by making using their products harder to use, they must view piracy as a competitor.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
IT versus users: a war that everyone loses
from Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow
I've just had a quick article on the wars between corporate IT and tech enthusiast employees published in the Harvard Business Review. I've been on both sides of that barricade, and while I understand the plight of IT, I think that it's against everyone's interest to give them to power to lock employees out of figuring out better ways of using their PCs and the Internet to get the job done.
The dirty secret of corporate IT is that its primary mission is to serve yesterday's technology needs, even if that means strangling tomorrow's technology solutions. The myth of corporate IT is that it alone possesses the wisdom to decide which technologies will allow the workers on the front line to work better, faster and smarter — albeit with the occasional lackluster requirements-gathering process, if you're lucky.
The fact is that the most dreadful violators of corporate policy — the ones getting that critical file to a supplier using Gmail because the corporate mail won't allow the attachment, the ones using IM to contact a vacationing colleague to find out how to handle a sticky situation, the incorrigible Twitterer who wants to sign up all his colleagues as followers through the work day — are also the most enthusiastic users of technology, the ones most apt to come up with the next out-of-left-field efficiency for the firm.
There has to be a way to bring those people inside the church, rather than going to war against them. I suspect the answer is in modern virtualization tools, which allow users to have a "clean" OS and environment that they use for in-compliance processing and work, and a "wild" sandbox where anything goes, each on separate network segments. Earning this setup would require demonstrating skill and desire to imagine new ways of getting the job done, and its use would be subject to regular, brief reports on lessons learned, techniques tried, failures and successes.
The High Priests of IT — And the Heretics
Source(s):
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/03/12/it-versus-users-a-wa.html
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
Eisenhower warned that "public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." Do you think it's happened? Why?
President Eisenhower made this admonishment during the farewell address at the end of his presidency. The full text of the speech can be found here:
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/dwightdeisenhowerfarewell.html
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/dwightdeisenhowerfarewell.html
Interesting Question?
Yes (1)
No (0)
- In Science & Mathematics |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| March 12, 2009 09:17 PM |
Too many in power are still extolling very draconian technological policy. They fail to grasp the full meaning, and potential, of the new technology arising. And frankly, I find their lack of faith disturbing.
This administration is starting to allow technology to do it's job. The administration has it's own blog. It's realizing that it must become transparent of it's own accord, because there's no more possibility of putting the genie back in the bottle once it's out. The internet, it's speed of transmission, and it's anonymity have destroyed the bottle.
Those who control our entertainment are slow to realize that it is beyond their control. Their most successful competitor is piracy. They fail to realize that instead of punishing lawful users by making using their products harder to use, they must view piracy as a competitor.
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (2)
March 12, 2009 07:43 PM
I think that there is a danger of that, especially in the area of ecology. I imagine a future in which large areas of the earth are off limits to everybody except members of organizations like the Sierra Club. In this future, membership in these clubs is hereditary.
Permalink | Report
March 12, 2009 09:12 PM
No, I really don't think it's happened yet, although it could. There are still simply too many in government, and even in the private sector, who don't understand technology, as in this post from BoingBoing.com: IT versus users: a war that everyone loses
from Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow
I've just had a quick article on the wars between corporate IT and tech enthusiast employees published in the Harvard Business Review. I've been on both sides of that barricade, and while I understand the plight of IT, I think that it's against everyone's interest to give them to power to lock employees out of figuring out better ways of using their PCs and the Internet to get the job done.
The dirty secret of corporate IT is that its primary mission is to serve yesterday's technology needs, even if that means strangling tomorrow's technology solutions. The myth of corporate IT is that it alone possesses the wisdom to decide which technologies will allow the workers on the front line to work better, faster and smarter — albeit with the occasional lackluster requirements-gathering process, if you're lucky.
The fact is that the most dreadful violators of corporate policy — the ones getting that critical file to a supplier using Gmail because the corporate mail won't allow the attachment, the ones using IM to contact a vacationing colleague to find out how to handle a sticky situation, the incorrigible Twitterer who wants to sign up all his colleagues as followers through the work day — are also the most enthusiastic users of technology, the ones most apt to come up with the next out-of-left-field efficiency for the firm.
There has to be a way to bring those people inside the church, rather than going to war against them. I suspect the answer is in modern virtualization tools, which allow users to have a "clean" OS and environment that they use for in-compliance processing and work, and a "wild" sandbox where anything goes, each on separate network segments. Earning this setup would require demonstrating skill and desire to imagine new ways of getting the job done, and its use would be subject to regular, brief reports on lessons learned, techniques tried, failures and successes.
The High Priests of IT — And the Heretics
Source(s):
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/03/12/it-versus-users-a-wa.html
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- digitalextremis..., November 30, 2009 06:54 PM
- mannu8710, November 30, 2009 06:52 PM
- gbondy, November 30, 2009 06:41 PM
- djg, November 30, 2009 06:41 PM
- hollaaaman, November 30, 2009 06:39 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More