Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.
Next Question

Answered Question

 
M$2 December 15, 2008 07:58 PM

Is Caroline Kennedy a good choice for Hillary Clinton's seat in the New York Senate?

As the only remaining child of President John F. Kennedy, she would seem a natural to be involved in politics--but she's never held an elected position.
Interesting Question?  Yes (0)   No (0)   
RSS
 
 

Best Answer  Chosen by Asker

 
December 15, 2008 08:26 PM
Hillary's seat is of course the one that belonged to her uncle, Robert F. Kennedy. Caroline Kennedy was born in and has lived most of her life in New York City and is an attorney and long time political activist, who has been quietly very active in public affairs, particularly in local education issues.

Gov. Paterson is under intense pressure from feminist groups to pick another woman to replace Hillary. They don't think it is acceptable for the Senate's most high profile female senator to have her seat taken by a man. Paterson is also being pressured by hispanic and african-americal lawmakers who want the seat for one of their own, as well as lawmakers from buffalo and elsewhere up north who think it should be the "upstate's" senate seat.

Picking Caroline Kennedy to replace Hillary makes a lot of sense for these reasons. She's high profile, she's a woman, she's a lifelong New Yorker, and when the election does come, you can't realistically see the voters of New York denying the daughter of John F. Kennedy the chance to continue serving in her uncle's seat. I actually doubt a serious democratic candidate would run against her unless she gets into some controversy or does a terrible job. Consider also that Caroline Kennedy chaired Obama's vp search committee and is closely aligned with the new President-elect. New York state could benefit from having a Senator with strong ties to the White Hosue.
Asker's Rating:
• The discussion about her background in quiet activism is very appropriate to this question. I personally wonder if it wasn't Obama's success that motivated her to finally step forward and take on the responsibility of politics. People talk as if this is a beauty pageant--but politics is hard work.


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip kenford for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 

Other Answers (13)

Sort By
 
December 15, 2008 08:01 PM
Sure. If the goal is to have another celebrity, anyway.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip hortwaddle for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:06 PM
She's ok. The question of whether her experience really qualifies her is moot since she's a Kennedy. Just being a Kennedy is enough experience for most people. They train them from birth. ;) For many, she'll be a bit too liberal, but I doubt that will be a problem for New Yorkers. I think she's a good fit, perhaps even better than Hillary. There are other qualified candidates as well, but it's about time Caroline got into the Senate and I think it will be a good launching point for her 2016 presidential campaign(oh yeah, count on it).

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip bmlhailstone for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:11 PM
I think she is a good choice. She has been around relatively progressive political thought her entire life. She knows the issues. She is an intelligent and accomplished lawyer who has led several public-benefit organizations to a successful existence.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip zallen for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:18 PM
She doesn't have much experience, but the Kennedy name goes a long way. She has some tough competition with Kristen Gillibrand and Thomas Suozzi.
Source(s):
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/16/us/politics/16caroline.html?hp


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip marcdd2 for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:21 PM
I think she is an excellent choice. She is a Kennedy which means she definitely has the background in politics.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip skullz5 for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:36 PM
No. We know nothing about her skills or wisdom or political acumen. All we know is that she shares chromosomes with some famous politicians. That shouldn't be enough to warrant appointment to one of the most powerful positions in the land.

On the other hand, you could have said the same thing about Hilary Clinton when she ran - no political accomplishments, just a famous family member. She did well enough as a first-term senator to win re-election, and well enough as a second-term senator to win 18 million votes as a candidate for the Democratic nomination.

Jane Hamsher had some good insight into this over at the firedoglake website.
Source(s):
Jane Hamsher's opinion: http://firedoglake.com/2008/12/07/caroline-kennedy-thanks-but-no-thanks/

firedoglake home page: http://www.firedoglake.com


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip daha for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:38 PM
No, although she is very thoughtful and I agree with her politics, she would only make a good pick if she has a good chance of getting reelected - otherwise her seat will go republican once she goes up for election. She is a very private person who would not make a good campaigner when the time comes.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip forsmanae for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:41 PM
"Are the times and circumstances good for Caroline Kennedy to try for a Senate seat?" would be the cynically correct question. While a professional lawyer and very active in politics, that does not immediately qualify her.

Part of the equation is an ability to raise money for re-election to the seat in 3-4 years. If Paterson feels she has that ability as well as the ability to represent NY in the US senate, then that is qualification enough. She has to make that case.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip vizier for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 08:57 PM
You shouldn't put someone in a powerful position just because of their name. I think we should put a strong, pragmatic candidate in the spot that should be decided and elected by the people of New York.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip masstrivialknowledge for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 09:01 PM
No, she nor the rest of the Kennedy's supported her when she was running for president. And now they want to benefit from her by taking her senate seat. Now that the Democrats are in power, she'd like to come in at the top. We have absolutely no idea if she's qualified, or whether she can take the heat of being a Kennedy in public life. She's certainly shown no appetite for it in the past.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip jbone6 for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 15, 2008 09:08 PM
No, her only experience is being the daughter of a president.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip angliciste for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 16, 2008 06:04 AM
Yes, Caroline Kennedy is a good choice for Hillary Clinton's seat in the New York Senate for three major reasons. She has royalty-like celebrity as the daughter of J.F.K. She is a female who can fill the needs of women fulfilled by Hillary, and which are currently being demanded due to the failure of Hillary's presidential election campaign. Caroline's experience as an attorney and Kennedy family member has given her exposure to dealings with powerful business professionals and politicians.
Additionally, Caroline Kennedy has public service experience in the New York City Department of Education, has been the public representative of her family, and is involved in public service organizations concerning minorities, elections, politics, and the arts. Her support of Barack Obama demonstrates her interest in a dedication to a better type of public service.
When you consider how common it is that politicians get into legal and ethical problems, a lack of political experience is not a bad thing. Caroline Kennedy's public service record, her pure interest in political excellence, and her strong influential status are highly beneficial attributes in a U.S. senator.
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Kennedy


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip jcaz for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
December 17, 2008 06:52 PM
Why not? People say well, she's not very experienced. But most senators aren't. In fact it's the starting job for many senators. She has the name, the know-how, the face, the backers, the posse, etc. She'll do fine.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip offthedome for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 

Answer this Question

How tips and payments work

This question has already been resolved. You may add an answer to it but you will not be eligible to win best answer or any associated tips.

Ask a Question


140 characters left
Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • buddawiggi
    buddawiggi
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    26334 Points
    M$768.49 Earned
  • kty2777
    kty2777
    Purple Belt
    4981 Points
    M$188.41 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt
    3508 Points
    M$146.67 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1537)
iphone(459)
music(450)
google(344)
food(303)
online(284)
beer(275)
money(259)
apple(247)
movies(241)
aotd(235)
health(208)
video(200)
dog(200)
free(198)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members


 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.