Next Question
RSS
Tough one, Hoard!
While I think the current Progressive movement would find it odd, I believe there is still something in today's progressivism from when the Progressive/Bull Moose Party was founded by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912. Back then, it was a split from the Republican party. Its platform included the intent "to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics", and I continue to hear this intent reflected in radio programs that are Progressive. Opponents to this Progressive stance then, current day, would be Republicans identified with the K Street Project (3), such as Grover Norquist and Tom Delay.
The Bull Moose Progressives believed in a "strong government to regulate industry and protect the middle and working classes." I think most current Republicans holding office oppose regulation of industry, believing in completely unfettered capitalism.
The Bull Moose Progressives supported Suffrage (2). Current Progressive views - also as exemplified by Progressive Radio (see sources) - continue to support gender equality, but have also expanded the scope to race, class and sexual orientation equality.
Another Bull Moose platform "plank" was for increased transparency in government, including the registration of lobbyists. This continues to be an agenda forwarded today, as Progressives are probably the most critical of the Obama administration for not completely abandoning the government secrecy established during Bush II.
The Bull Moose Progressives also stood for "social and industrial justice" (3) - in essence labor rights. No child labor, establishment of minimum safety and health standards, a minimum wage sufficient to provide a living, 8-hour day and one day off in 7, and the abolition of convict labor are included in this plank. Also included was the loose definition of Social Security, which was not instituted until another Roosevelt held office. Literacy and vocational education were mentioned in this section, also. These beliefs are also reflected in current Progressive radio.
Bull Moose Progressive also advocated for conservation of resources and agriculture "for the public good". This probably can be translated as the modern-day ecology movement.
There are additional Bull Moose tenants, such as protection of waterways, the Panama Canal and its uses, role of the Courts, protection of Country life, etc. Some are less relevant today.
It looks like the roots of the Progressive movement are with Theodore Roosevelt and Hiram Johnson in the Bull Moose Party, as these are the views I hear today on Progressive radio and see at the Independent Progressive Politics Network, Huffington Post, etc. Like any political stance, it's hard to clearly define because there are people who strongly identify with the political stance but who may not be as strong an advocate of one or more of the views advocated.
I would add a final Progressive viewpoint that military action should only be used in actual self-defense, not as expansionism or in preservation of business. This is a unifying theme in current Progressive media. Identified viewpoints of current Progressive belief are, then:
1. Opposition to corrupt business and corrupt politics and alliances between them. (1) This includes anti-trust and an opposition to corporations as people.
2. Regulation of industry to protect middle and working classes.
3. Equality for all, regardless of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation or class.
4. Transparency in government.
5. Labor Rights.
6. Minimum/Living Wage
7. Social Security
8. Literacy
9. Protection of Ecology
10. Military action only to be used in defense of the country, not for expansion or protection of business interests.
Progressives in politics today: Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), Maxine Waters (D-CA), John Conyers (D-MI), Al Franken (D-MN), Barney Frank (D-MA) come to mind. All have backed many of the Progressive viewpoints listed above.
Opponents to progressive politics today: John Boehner (R-OH), Rick Santorum (R-PA), Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Eric Cantor (R-VA), and Mitch McConnell (R-KY). All have opposed most or all of the viewpoints. They are pro-business and unfettered capitalism, anti-regulation, and tend to be against full equal rights.
Source(s):
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Party_(United_States,_1912)
2. Progressive Party Platform of 1912 at: http://people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek/platideas/progressiv.html
3. K Street Project: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K_Street_Project
Radio shows/blogs that identify themselves as Progressive: Democracy Now, Pacifica Radio network, Randi Rhodes, Ed Shulz, Daily Kos, Huffington Post.
Permalink | Report
defolts
bbrookin
The first key to understanding progressiveness is that it's not the same as liberalism, as many might assume. "Progressiveness is an orientation towards politics," Halpin said in an interview with Campus Progress. "It's not a long-standing ideology like liberalism, but an historically-grounded concept ... that accepts the world as dynamic."
Source(s):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/26/AR200711260...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_politics
Tags: politics, progressiveness
Helpful Answer?
(1)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Tony Blair, the former British Prime Minister, used the term frequently, and he is a good example of what the term means and why it's used.
He defined himself as progressive because his agenda was about reforming institutions, creating greater opportunites for people, extending tolerance and respect for diversity etc. But he was also strongly pro-business, keen on using market mechanisms in public sevices, supported free trade etc. His views and policies were in many ways not what would have been understood by terms like "socialist".
So calling himself and his agenda "progressive" was both accurate and a branding exercise. It meant he wasn't using labels that had negative and innaccurate associations, but he was using a term that a lot of people, including the more traditionally left-wing people in his own party, could identify with, and consider themselves included in.
In the US, I think the label would probably fit Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, but I don't think it's one that I've heard them using a lot.
As for who opposes progressives, given my explanation, there are a few things to bear in mind. Someone like Tony Blair would want to use the label very broadly, so it would actually include a number of people that opposed his policies, but supported his aims. For example, even if teacher unions opposed educational reforms, he would want to count unions generally as "progressive", while suggesting that holding on to the status quo is anti-progressive.
But in practice people that call themselves progressives nowadays are likely to be opposed from two directions, people whose views are more traditionally left-wing, and people whose views are socially conservative or very right-wing economically.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1
August 23, 2009 10:22 AM
In politics, What is a Progressive?
Who are examples of progressives in politics today? Who are the major opponents of progressives and why?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| August 23, 2009 06:08 PM |
While I think the current Progressive movement would find it odd, I believe there is still something in today's progressivism from when the Progressive/Bull Moose Party was founded by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912. Back then, it was a split from the Republican party. Its platform included the intent "to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics", and I continue to hear this intent reflected in radio programs that are Progressive. Opponents to this Progressive stance then, current day, would be Republicans identified with the K Street Project (3), such as Grover Norquist and Tom Delay.
The Bull Moose Progressives believed in a "strong government to regulate industry and protect the middle and working classes." I think most current Republicans holding office oppose regulation of industry, believing in completely unfettered capitalism.
The Bull Moose Progressives supported Suffrage (2). Current Progressive views - also as exemplified by Progressive Radio (see sources) - continue to support gender equality, but have also expanded the scope to race, class and sexual orientation equality.
Another Bull Moose platform "plank" was for increased transparency in government, including the registration of lobbyists. This continues to be an agenda forwarded today, as Progressives are probably the most critical of the Obama administration for not completely abandoning the government secrecy established during Bush II.
The Bull Moose Progressives also stood for "social and industrial justice" (3) - in essence labor rights. No child labor, establishment of minimum safety and health standards, a minimum wage sufficient to provide a living, 8-hour day and one day off in 7, and the abolition of convict labor are included in this plank. Also included was the loose definition of Social Security, which was not instituted until another Roosevelt held office. Literacy and vocational education were mentioned in this section, also. These beliefs are also reflected in current Progressive radio.
Bull Moose Progressive also advocated for conservation of resources and agriculture "for the public good". This probably can be translated as the modern-day ecology movement.
There are additional Bull Moose tenants, such as protection of waterways, the Panama Canal and its uses, role of the Courts, protection of Country life, etc. Some are less relevant today.
It looks like the roots of the Progressive movement are with Theodore Roosevelt and Hiram Johnson in the Bull Moose Party, as these are the views I hear today on Progressive radio and see at the Independent Progressive Politics Network, Huffington Post, etc. Like any political stance, it's hard to clearly define because there are people who strongly identify with the political stance but who may not be as strong an advocate of one or more of the views advocated.
I would add a final Progressive viewpoint that military action should only be used in actual self-defense, not as expansionism or in preservation of business. This is a unifying theme in current Progressive media. Identified viewpoints of current Progressive belief are, then:
1. Opposition to corrupt business and corrupt politics and alliances between them. (1) This includes anti-trust and an opposition to corporations as people.
2. Regulation of industry to protect middle and working classes.
3. Equality for all, regardless of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation or class.
4. Transparency in government.
5. Labor Rights.
6. Minimum/Living Wage
7. Social Security
8. Literacy
9. Protection of Ecology
10. Military action only to be used in defense of the country, not for expansion or protection of business interests.
Progressives in politics today: Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), Maxine Waters (D-CA), John Conyers (D-MI), Al Franken (D-MN), Barney Frank (D-MA) come to mind. All have backed many of the Progressive viewpoints listed above.
Opponents to progressive politics today: John Boehner (R-OH), Rick Santorum (R-PA), Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Eric Cantor (R-VA), and Mitch McConnell (R-KY). All have opposed most or all of the viewpoints. They are pro-business and unfettered capitalism, anti-regulation, and tend to be against full equal rights.
Source(s):
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Party_(United_States,_1912)
2. Progressive Party Platform of 1912 at: http://people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek/platideas/progressiv.html
3. K Street Project: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K_Street_Project
Radio shows/blogs that identify themselves as Progressive: Democracy Now, Pacifica Radio network, Randi Rhodes, Ed Shulz, Daily Kos, Huffington Post.
| Asker's Rating: |
• Thanks for the great detailed answer!
Permalink | Report
defolts
August 23, 2009 09:07 PM
and Thom Hartman, Stephanie Miller, Ron Reagan, Mike Malloy, Rachel Maddow... to name a few, listen to their programs (KTLK 1150 am Los Angeles) and then compare them to the so-called Conservatives (anarchists really) and see who offers up more thoughtful commentary instead of emotional appeals.
Tip defolts for this comment
Report
bbrookin
August 23, 2009 09:37 PM
Nice additions to the list, thank you! I was running out of steam by the last bit...
Tip bbrookin for this comment
Report
Other Answers (2)
August 23, 2009 10:46 AM
Progressivism, like many important concepts, is many things to many people. Nevertheless, it has its own history, its own culture, and its own politics - all wrapped into a potent package that is making its comeback in the political discourse of this great country. The Campus Progress conference is just the latest manifestation of a political movement that is already changing America's political landscape for the better. The first key to understanding progressiveness is that it's not the same as liberalism, as many might assume. "Progressiveness is an orientation towards politics," Halpin said in an interview with Campus Progress. "It's not a long-standing ideology like liberalism, but an historically-grounded concept ... that accepts the world as dynamic."
Source(s):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/26/AR200711260...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_politics
Tags: politics, progressiveness
Helpful Answer?
(1)
(0)
Helpful: videopia
Tip benney for this answer
August 23, 2009 04:48 PM
Like many terms in politics it's something that is pretty loosely defined, and the very use of the term has a political purpose. It is used in contrast to "conservative" but without actually implying a particular policy position, as might be understood with terms like "left-wing", "liberal" or "socialist". Tony Blair, the former British Prime Minister, used the term frequently, and he is a good example of what the term means and why it's used.
He defined himself as progressive because his agenda was about reforming institutions, creating greater opportunites for people, extending tolerance and respect for diversity etc. But he was also strongly pro-business, keen on using market mechanisms in public sevices, supported free trade etc. His views and policies were in many ways not what would have been understood by terms like "socialist".
So calling himself and his agenda "progressive" was both accurate and a branding exercise. It meant he wasn't using labels that had negative and innaccurate associations, but he was using a term that a lot of people, including the more traditionally left-wing people in his own party, could identify with, and consider themselves included in.
In the US, I think the label would probably fit Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, but I don't think it's one that I've heard them using a lot.
As for who opposes progressives, given my explanation, there are a few things to bear in mind. Someone like Tony Blair would want to use the label very broadly, so it would actually include a number of people that opposed his policies, but supported his aims. For example, even if teacher unions opposed educational reforms, he would want to count unions generally as "progressive", while suggesting that holding on to the status quo is anti-progressive.
But in practice people that call themselves progressives nowadays are likely to be opposed from two directions, people whose views are more traditionally left-wing, and people whose views are socially conservative or very right-wing economically.
Permalink | Report
August 23, 2009 09:48 PM
I dunno...although you're right that Blair has called himself a progressive, few of the progressives in the U.S. of which I'm aware would consider him so. Bill Clinton is not generally considered a progressive, and I can't find anywhere that Barack Obama considers himself a progressive, nor do progressives consider him one of their own.
I think you're right that it's often a branding exercise, though. In the U.S., most conservative Republicans would probably get pretty angry if you called them a progressive now.
Report
I think you're right that it's often a branding exercise, though. In the U.S., most conservative Republicans would probably get pretty angry if you called them a progressive now.
August 24, 2009 02:57 PM
I don't think anyone on the right ever calls themselves a progressive.
Though I don't really see the term being used a lot in US politics at all.
Who are the people you're referring to in the US that call themselves progressives?
Report
Though I don't really see the term being used a lot in US politics at all.
Who are the people you're referring to in the US that call themselves progressives?
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- frggy69, November 25, 2009 01:28 AM
- thefrogman, November 25, 2009 01:10 AM
- purpledarts, November 25, 2009 01:03 AM
- dmourey, November 25, 2009 01:02 AM
- ncsa, November 25, 2009 12:58 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
