Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.
Next Question

Answered Question

 
 M¢50  Funded By Mahalo ? |  September 08, 2009 01:36 PM

What was Obama thinking when he appointed Van Jones, and does this appointment reflect poorly on Obama's judgment?

Perhaps you think it was a good nomination? Please note that the question is about Obama's judgment concerning his nomination of Van Jones, not everyone's opinion of the hundreds of bad nominations that past presidents have surely made. I want to know what you think of THIS ONE. Thanks!
Interesting Question?  Yes (0)   No (0)   
RSS
 
 

Best Answer  Decided by Votes

 
September 08, 2009 02:05 PM
It was a reasonable appointment. Jones has a very good record of promoting and organizing Green causes and wrote a very well regarded book on the subject of Green economic growth. Unfortunately anyone reaching a high level in politics is under the microscope for all past public comments and has to consistently speak in a politically correct manner. I don't think his resigning will help much because he was actually quite correct in calling the Republicans "a-----es" even though it was not a conventional or polite thing to say. So the Republicans will attack someone else in the administration with or without reason; and, the amount of virulent verbiage they produce will stay the same.

(please note that it is Van Jones not Von Jones so that people can google for themselves more easily.)
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Jones
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Green_Collar_Economy
http://www.amazon.com/Green-Collar-Economy-Solution-Problems/dp/0061650757



Tags: green, economy

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip albanian for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
September 08, 2009 02:12 PM
Thanks for the links... they're very helpful

Report
 
 
 
September 08, 2009 02:34 PM
Thanks for your answer and thanks for the spell correction, I made the change in my question.
To be clear, you seem to say Van's virulent verbiage was correct, but the Republicans are wrong in theirs? Don't you think both sides could tone it down a bit? Just curious.

Report
 
 
 
September 08, 2009 06:01 PM
The Republican efforts have been long term and persistent. Van Jones' remarks were from an environmentalist meeting before he was appointed to his White House position. There is a difference of scale. Also, a simple schoolyard insult isn't the same as the continual misinformation and absurd comparisons to Nazi and Communist regimes. The administration are only Democrats, and not even all that liberal.

Report
 
 

Answer this Question

How tips and payments work

This question has already been resolved. You may add an answer to it but you will not be eligible to win best answer or any associated tips.

Ask a Question


140 characters left
Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • buddawiggi
    buddawiggi
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    27543 Points
    M$789.91 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt
    4443 Points
    M$196.22 Earned
  • annelisle
    annelisle
    Purple Belt
    2997 Points
    M$91.22 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1620)
iphone(465)
music(461)
google(357)
food(321)
online(295)
beer(279)
money(262)
movies(258)
apple(251)
aotd(235)
health(220)
video(208)
free(205)
dog(205)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members


 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.