Next Question
RSS
Breastfeeding isn't obscenity. It is the normal way to feed babies and toddlers, if you take into account the span of history and cultures across the globe. The reason people put those pictures up there is to counteract the propaganda and millions of dollars spent by the purveyors of fake baby milk--the hospitals will usually send home packages of artificial milk even with parents who have stated they want to feed their babies the normal way.
Parents, unlike the artificial infant feeding companies, don't have millions of dollars to sink into advertising, but they want to help others avoid the pitfalls of fake milk, like lowered I.Q., increased risk of minor to severe illness and death, and underdeveloped facial muscles. So they put pictures on Facebook and other social sites, and videos on Youtube to let other parents considering nursing their babies that they are not alone.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
1) an employee at a company makes a decision and takes action.
2) a customer is offended.
3) the customer raises a stink
4) NOW is the opportunity the company has to turn a tempest in a teapot into bad publicity or good publicity.
the details change, but half the customer service stories that make national news fit into that pattern.
Permalink | Report
I just don't see who is getting hurt in this scenario.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
December 22, 2008 10:02 PM
Should Facebook ban breastfeeding pictures?
Facebook has decided to ban pictures of mothers breastfeeding their children. I found this blurb about it: http://www.sodahead.com/question/214969/facebook-bans-breast-feeding-pictures-is-this-fair/
What do you think about that?
What do you think about that?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| December 23, 2008 04:10 AM |
Parents, unlike the artificial infant feeding companies, don't have millions of dollars to sink into advertising, but they want to help others avoid the pitfalls of fake milk, like lowered I.Q., increased risk of minor to severe illness and death, and underdeveloped facial muscles. So they put pictures on Facebook and other social sites, and videos on Youtube to let other parents considering nursing their babies that they are not alone.
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (9)
December 22, 2008 10:12 PM
As this question seems more of a matter of opinion, my opinion is yes. Yes because in US culture, mother's don't generally breastfeed their children in public. So I understand why Facebook made that decision, though they should not ban breastfeeding photos that are set as Private. The photos are usually intimate moments between mother and child, some people may want to share that, but should only be allowed to with people they know. You shouldn't be browsing through Facebook and find nude photos of people, even though breastfeeding a child is not gratuitous.
Permalink | Report
December 22, 2008 10:29 PM
Some people do not like seeing other people engaged in intimate behavior. It can offend sensibilities, especially in certain conservative cultures. There is no need to get into specifics but obviously there are many behaviors which are not acceptable as profile pics on what is a public social networking site. Ultimately, they have a duty to determine what is reasonable given the trade-off between potential offense to some and the benefit that is achieved by allowing such images. Their decision to err on the side of preventing offense is logical.
Permalink | Report
December 22, 2008 10:36 PM
this sort of thing happens all the time. 1) an employee at a company makes a decision and takes action.
2) a customer is offended.
3) the customer raises a stink
4) NOW is the opportunity the company has to turn a tempest in a teapot into bad publicity or good publicity.
the details change, but half the customer service stories that make national news fit into that pattern.
Permalink | Report
December 22, 2008 10:55 PM
I don't think they should ban the pictures. Most employers ban facebook at work (a good idea) so there shouldn't be any cases of these images coming up the news feed. If you are browsing at home and your friend wants to share the images then great for them. I just don't see who is getting hurt in this scenario.
Permalink | Report
December 23, 2008 02:17 AM
I don't see the big fuss about breastfeeding pics being offensive. It's a perfectly natural part of life! I don't get why Americans think breasts are so offensive especially when "shown" in a nonsexual context. I say "shown" because you can't even see nipples. Facebook has bigger things to worry about like spam and security.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- ham3d, November 09, 2009 06:18 PM
- diy_moldbook, November 09, 2009 05:55 PM
- irrapol, November 09, 2009 05:49 PM
- mane2009, November 09, 2009 05:48 PM
- beccasd, November 09, 2009 05:47 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
