Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M¢25 Funded By Mahalo ? |
February 20, 2009 05:18 PM
RSS
>In physical contests, like athletics, it makes sense to have different awards. But "acting" is a level field for both men and women!
@dattapan:
Maybe you have some statistics to back that up? From SAG, we continually see that women over 40 are severely underrepresented in relation to census data. The opposite for Caucasian (over 3/4th of roles). [1]
"...only 27 percent of speaking roles in top-grossing U.S. films are female..."
http://imow.org/wpp/stories/viewStory?storyId=1602
"...400 of the top-grossing G, PG, PG-13, and R-rated theatrically-released films in North America between January 1, 1990 and September 4th, 2006....73% of the characters are male. This translates into a ratio of 2.71 males to every 1 female."[2]
I can't imagine when the Oscars started in 1927, how few female leads existed. Popular roles: housewife, whore, madam, adulterer, bank robber.
21 Oscars have gone to women playing hookers, madams, mistresses, promiscuous ladies. Rough math: 1927-2007 = 70 years * 2 awards (lead + support). So, 21/140 = 15% of award-winning roles were tramps of some sort. [3]
Women behind-the-scenes, as producers, directors, etc. are underrepresented statistically. But, as was mentioned before, those roles are not cast by gender. [4]
Beyond statistics, is the concept of the male actor and female actor award. You may have a great female lead with a terrible male lead, and still be nominated for an Oscar. The distinction between male/female and lead/supporting give four opportunities to recognize an individual's contribution to film.
Removing the distinction would not help. It would cloud the award process.
On the other hand, creating a "Best Female Cinematographer" award would be, obviously, a crude attempt at pushing gender equality. Consider that 2% were women when counting the top 250 films in 2007.[5]
Source(s):
1http://www.sag.org/files/documents/CastingDataReport.pdf
2http://www.thegeenadavisinstitute.org/downloads/GDIGM_Main_Findings.pdf
3http://www.filmsite.org/bestactress.html
4http://magazine.women-in-film.com/Portals/0/Article_Images/lauzen/2007ceili...
5http://magazine.women-in-film.com/Portals/0/Article_Images/lauzen/2007ceili...
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
dattappan
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
Why there are 2 oscar awards best actor and best actress? Shouldn't we have just one - best acting for a lead
Shouldn't we have just one - best acting for a lead role?
We don't have "Best Directress" award? Why not add that one too?
Di`rect´ress = A woman who directs.
We don't have "Best Directress" award? Why not add that one too?
Di`rect´ress = A woman who directs.
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (1)
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| February 21, 2009 01:37 AM |
@dattapan:
Maybe you have some statistics to back that up? From SAG, we continually see that women over 40 are severely underrepresented in relation to census data. The opposite for Caucasian (over 3/4th of roles). [1]
"...only 27 percent of speaking roles in top-grossing U.S. films are female..."
http://imow.org/wpp/stories/viewStory?storyId=1602
"...400 of the top-grossing G, PG, PG-13, and R-rated theatrically-released films in North America between January 1, 1990 and September 4th, 2006....73% of the characters are male. This translates into a ratio of 2.71 males to every 1 female."[2]
I can't imagine when the Oscars started in 1927, how few female leads existed. Popular roles: housewife, whore, madam, adulterer, bank robber.
21 Oscars have gone to women playing hookers, madams, mistresses, promiscuous ladies. Rough math: 1927-2007 = 70 years * 2 awards (lead + support). So, 21/140 = 15% of award-winning roles were tramps of some sort. [3]
Women behind-the-scenes, as producers, directors, etc. are underrepresented statistically. But, as was mentioned before, those roles are not cast by gender. [4]
Beyond statistics, is the concept of the male actor and female actor award. You may have a great female lead with a terrible male lead, and still be nominated for an Oscar. The distinction between male/female and lead/supporting give four opportunities to recognize an individual's contribution to film.
Removing the distinction would not help. It would cloud the award process.
On the other hand, creating a "Best Female Cinematographer" award would be, obviously, a crude attempt at pushing gender equality. Consider that 2% were women when counting the top 250 films in 2007.[5]
Source(s):
1http://www.sag.org/files/documents/CastingDataReport.pdf
2http://www.thegeenadavisinstitute.org/downloads/GDIGM_Main_Findings.pdf
3http://www.filmsite.org/bestactress.html
4http://magazine.women-in-film.com/Portals/0/Article_Images/lauzen/2007ceili...
5http://magazine.women-in-film.com/Portals/0/Article_Images/lauzen/2007ceili...
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (3)
February 20, 2009 05:21 PM
It's because one plays a man's role and another plays a woman's role. A director or a directress is unisexual, and could be a man or a woman. Since they are not acting or seen in the movie, all they need is one. A woman and a man as a director or directress have the same role, whereas a male or female actor have different roles in the movie. For instance, a woman can be a mother, whereas a man would be a father. With a director, you're just a director, and they do not need a male or female director award.
Permalink | Report
dattappan
February 20, 2009 05:31 PM
In physical contests, like athletics, it makes sense to have different awards. But "acting" is a level field for both men and women!
Tip dattappan for this comment
Report
February 20, 2009 06:33 PM
I understand what you are saying that regardless of whether some one is male or female, they are both acting but if you made it just one Best Acting Award, you would eliminate half the performances, though it would help cut down on the length of the award shows. In some cases, there really is only one "lead role" but I think the majority of films/stories are based on the interaction of two main characters. In ''Frost/Nixon'', the two "lead" roles are played by men and Frank Langella (Nixon) was nominated for the Oscar. But in ''Doubt'', it is the interaction between Meryl Streep and Philip Seymour Hoffman that drives the film.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Have any experience on the coupon acceptance policy at Ingles Grocery Markets recentl...
I just answered a question and I notice that after refreshing the page, it says I ans...
I paid over $300 US.After 2 months the butt ripped below the cheek. Jeans are loose f...
If you were a paramedic and came upon a wreck that was your wife and her lover what w...
I just answered a question and I notice that after refreshing the page, it says I ans...
I paid over $300 US.After 2 months the butt ripped below the cheek. Jeans are loose f...
If you were a paramedic and came upon a wreck that was your wife and her lover what w...
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- tyyarns, November 28, 2009 06:35 PM
- karenbarber, November 28, 2009 06:33 PM
- fb_1365460222, November 28, 2009 06:18 PM
- blahblahblahh, November 28, 2009 06:17 PM
- carmenrami, November 28, 2009 06:07 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More