Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.
Next Question

Answered Question

 
M$1 April 30, 2009 06:15 PM

First 100 days of Fox Coverage of Obama video

Thoughts on this "The first 100 days of Fox coverage of Obama" video?
Interesting Question?  Yes (1)   No (0)   

Interesting: xds

RSS
 
 

Best Answer  Decided by Votes

xds xds
 
April 30, 2009 07:14 PM
You know i think everyone so easily forgets this man is the most powerful man in the known world.
And i don't think you can judge someone by 1 day or 100 days, the only way you truely know someone is you have to have fought them.
...If you have tested their spirit and determination to succeed.

I'm not to happy about the banks and the ponzies getting more sauce on their steak - anymore than anyone else.

But whatever happens please remember he's still the president, we should support him even in the darkest hours.

PS: By the way, as far as rush/glenn/and o'Riely are concerned i'm sure they have their own agendas probably motivated by the heads of the parent of the parent of the parent of whoeverdawhatstheirface of fox news.
-

And you know you get more with honey....

Source(s):
My common !@#$ sense!



Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip xds for this answer
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: lesliec, jellylala
   Reply  
 
 

Other Answers (3)

Sort By
 
April 30, 2009 07:23 PM
Playing Devil's Advocate here on behalf of Fox, it's very easy to use some slick editing to cut together a pastiche that appears to represent any viewpoint you like. Keep in mind the source of this video: mediamatters.org, a website that, in my opinion, definitely has a beef with Fox.

OK, that's about as far as I can take the Devil's Advocate position for Fox. They certainly don't make it hard to cut these types of videos together. As I don't watch Fox unless I am held hostage by a TV in a restaurant or airport I can't turn off, I have no idea if they represent their most conservative personalities (Beck, Hannity, etc) as "journalists", or if their viewers consider them such, in the traditional sense. I'd have to guess that they probably don't bother to differentiate, as "If it's on the TV, it must be true!"

Anyone who doesn't watch mainstream media with some skepticism is just fooling themselves. Though they may not be as blunt as Fox, I'm sure CNN has an agenda/slant behind every one of it's personalities as well. As every single person in either organization is human, I find it hard to believe that any of them is able to remain completely objective 100% of the time. Result: even when reporting on strictly the facts, even subtly body language, tonal inflection and strategic omission can, and does, convey a subjective position.

Then who do we trust?

Trust in your own ability to make an informed decision, and don't let anyone, be it Jon Stewart or Glen Beck, tell you how to think. If you've made a decision or formulated a viewpoint before researching the facts for yourself, be willing to admit that lack of objectivity, and don't represent yourself as 100% "fair and balanced".
Source(s):
http://mediamatters.org/columns/200904290009


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip modctek for this answer
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: bunnyphuphu
   Reply  
 
 
 
April 30, 2009 07:55 PM
I believe this is consistent with Fox News coverage of Democrats be it Barack Obama, Al Gore or any other person who leans left of center. With the Republicans out of power FNC is kinda interesting in how they appear to be spiraling out of control and into fits of insanity right before our very eyes. They have huge ratings but I think its only because they are using fear (everyday the sky is falling at FNC) as a tool to keep their audience.

I don't think there is anything wrong with having a network that reports from the Right, but the "Fair and Balanced" tagline is simply Orwellian in how wrong it is, and the amount of misinformation they spread is irresponsible and troubling.

With that said... they have already taken their right to lie to the public to court, and won.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZkDikRLQrw

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip jeffhoard for this answer
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: bbrookin
   Reply  
 
 
 
April 30, 2009 10:17 PM
For the sake of argument, even if you are correct that the FoxNews tagline “fair and balanced” is a subversion of language (and I’m not at all certain it is), there are a variety of other news sources available, so the effect is considerably diluted.

Orwellian language can only really be employed in areas that affect us all equally, like in the area of government or if there were only a single media outlet (or perhaps even if there were an overwhelming consensus of opinion among the major news outlets). I hardly think FoxNews constitutes such a consensus.

At any rate, why not welcome alternative points of view? If all news that we did not experience firsthand comes to us filtered in some way, shouldn’t we want as many points of view as possible?

Report
 
 
 
April 30, 2009 10:33 PM
It’s impossible to take any video that’s so heavily spliced as a genuine source of information. By the 30 second mark, it has the looks of a propaganda piece, since we have no idea of the context of these remarks, and it isn’t clear at all whether any of them really relate to each other.

With montages like this, you either agree or disagree with the point of view that it's espousing. If you agree, then you'll probably enjoy the artwork. If you disagree, you may be offended.

One other thought specific to this video. It seems to make much of the fact that FoxNews associates are critical of Obama's policies. In the larger framework of this vide, I think the goal is to evoke outrage at the naysayers. But wasn't it just a few short months ago that criticizing the president was an act of patriotism?

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip daigakuinsei for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 

Answer this Question

How tips and payments work

This question has already been resolved. You may add an answer to it but you will not be eligible to win best answer or any associated tips.

Ask a Question


140 characters left
Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • buddawiggi
    buddawiggi
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    26427 Points
    M$771.39 Earned
  • kty2777
    kty2777
    Purple Belt with a Brown Tip
    5138 Points
    M$193.66 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt
    3659 Points
    M$149.42 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1551)
iphone(459)
music(454)
google(346)
food(307)
online(286)
beer(275)
money(261)
movies(247)
apple(247)
aotd(235)
health(210)
video(202)
free(202)
dog(200)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members


 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.