Next Question
RSS
You know i think everyone so easily forgets this man is the most powerful man in the known world.
And i don't think you can judge someone by 1 day or 100 days, the only way you truely know someone is you have to have fought them.
...If you have tested their spirit and determination to succeed.
I'm not to happy about the banks and the ponzies getting more sauce on their steak - anymore than anyone else.
But whatever happens please remember he's still the president, we should support him even in the darkest hours.
PS: By the way, as far as rush/glenn/and o'Riely are concerned i'm sure they have their own agendas probably motivated by the heads of the parent of the parent of the parent of whoeverdawhatstheirface of fox news.
-
And you know you get more with honey....
Source(s):
My common !@#$ sense!
Permalink | Report
OK, that's about as far as I can take the Devil's Advocate position for Fox. They certainly don't make it hard to cut these types of videos together. As I don't watch Fox unless I am held hostage by a TV in a restaurant or airport I can't turn off, I have no idea if they represent their most conservative personalities (Beck, Hannity, etc) as "journalists", or if their viewers consider them such, in the traditional sense. I'd have to guess that they probably don't bother to differentiate, as "If it's on the TV, it must be true!"
Anyone who doesn't watch mainstream media with some skepticism is just fooling themselves. Though they may not be as blunt as Fox, I'm sure CNN has an agenda/slant behind every one of it's personalities as well. As every single person in either organization is human, I find it hard to believe that any of them is able to remain completely objective 100% of the time. Result: even when reporting on strictly the facts, even subtly body language, tonal inflection and strategic omission can, and does, convey a subjective position.
Then who do we trust?
Trust in your own ability to make an informed decision, and don't let anyone, be it Jon Stewart or Glen Beck, tell you how to think. If you've made a decision or formulated a viewpoint before researching the facts for yourself, be willing to admit that lack of objectivity, and don't represent yourself as 100% "fair and balanced".
Source(s):
http://mediamatters.org/columns/200904290009
Permalink | Report
I don't think there is anything wrong with having a network that reports from the Right, but the "Fair and Balanced" tagline is simply Orwellian in how wrong it is, and the amount of misinformation they spread is irresponsible and troubling.
With that said... they have already taken their right to lie to the public to court, and won.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZkDikRLQrw
Permalink | Report
With montages like this, you either agree or disagree with the point of view that it's espousing. If you agree, then you'll probably enjoy the artwork. If you disagree, you may be offended.
One other thought specific to this video. It seems to make much of the fact that FoxNews associates are critical of Obama's policies. In the larger framework of this vide, I think the goal is to evoke outrage at the naysayers. But wasn't it just a few short months ago that criticizing the president was an act of patriotism?
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1
April 30, 2009 06:15 PM
First 100 days of Fox Coverage of Obama video
Thoughts on this "The first 100 days of Fox coverage of Obama" video?
- In Obama Administration |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| April 30, 2009 07:14 PM |
And i don't think you can judge someone by 1 day or 100 days, the only way you truely know someone is you have to have fought them.
...If you have tested their spirit and determination to succeed.
I'm not to happy about the banks and the ponzies getting more sauce on their steak - anymore than anyone else.
But whatever happens please remember he's still the president, we should support him even in the darkest hours.
PS: By the way, as far as rush/glenn/and o'Riely are concerned i'm sure they have their own agendas probably motivated by the heads of the parent of the parent of the parent of whoeverdawhatstheirface of fox news.
-
And you know you get more with honey....
Source(s):
My common !@#$ sense!
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (3)
April 30, 2009 07:23 PM
Playing Devil's Advocate here on behalf of Fox, it's very easy to use some slick editing to cut together a pastiche that appears to represent any viewpoint you like. Keep in mind the source of this video: mediamatters.org, a website that, in my opinion, definitely has a beef with Fox. OK, that's about as far as I can take the Devil's Advocate position for Fox. They certainly don't make it hard to cut these types of videos together. As I don't watch Fox unless I am held hostage by a TV in a restaurant or airport I can't turn off, I have no idea if they represent their most conservative personalities (Beck, Hannity, etc) as "journalists", or if their viewers consider them such, in the traditional sense. I'd have to guess that they probably don't bother to differentiate, as "If it's on the TV, it must be true!"
Anyone who doesn't watch mainstream media with some skepticism is just fooling themselves. Though they may not be as blunt as Fox, I'm sure CNN has an agenda/slant behind every one of it's personalities as well. As every single person in either organization is human, I find it hard to believe that any of them is able to remain completely objective 100% of the time. Result: even when reporting on strictly the facts, even subtly body language, tonal inflection and strategic omission can, and does, convey a subjective position.
Then who do we trust?
Trust in your own ability to make an informed decision, and don't let anyone, be it Jon Stewart or Glen Beck, tell you how to think. If you've made a decision or formulated a viewpoint before researching the facts for yourself, be willing to admit that lack of objectivity, and don't represent yourself as 100% "fair and balanced".
Source(s):
http://mediamatters.org/columns/200904290009
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: bunnyphuphu
April 30, 2009 07:55 PM
I believe this is consistent with Fox News coverage of Democrats be it Barack Obama, Al Gore or any other person who leans left of center. With the Republicans out of power FNC is kinda interesting in how they appear to be spiraling out of control and into fits of insanity right before our very eyes. They have huge ratings but I think its only because they are using fear (everyday the sky is falling at FNC) as a tool to keep their audience. I don't think there is anything wrong with having a network that reports from the Right, but the "Fair and Balanced" tagline is simply Orwellian in how wrong it is, and the amount of misinformation they spread is irresponsible and troubling.
With that said... they have already taken their right to lie to the public to court, and won.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZkDikRLQrw
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: bbrookin
April 30, 2009 10:33 PM
It’s impossible to take any video that’s so heavily spliced as a genuine source of information. By the 30 second mark, it has the looks of a propaganda piece, since we have no idea of the context of these remarks, and it isn’t clear at all whether any of them really relate to each other. With montages like this, you either agree or disagree with the point of view that it's espousing. If you agree, then you'll probably enjoy the artwork. If you disagree, you may be offended.
One other thought specific to this video. It seems to make much of the fact that FoxNews associates are critical of Obama's policies. In the larger framework of this vide, I think the goal is to evoke outrage at the naysayers. But wasn't it just a few short months ago that criticizing the president was an act of patriotism?
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Anyone know where I can watch the new lady gaga video that came out today called Bad ...
i wanted to know when a women gets pregnant.means when to do sex??whats their monthly...
Is there a website that has a list of how long certain videos games take to beat?
NOT A QUESTION per se... rather a comment: Although I'm currently working from Canuc...
i wanted to know when a women gets pregnant.means when to do sex??whats their monthly...
Is there a website that has a list of how long certain videos games take to beat?
NOT A QUESTION per se... rather a comment: Although I'm currently working from Canuc...
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- skylar06, November 08, 2009 03:38 PM
- electricheart, November 08, 2009 03:35 PM
- dancychic, November 08, 2009 03:34 PM
- tmichero, November 08, 2009 03:30 PM
- trevorpressman, November 08, 2009 03:14 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

Orwellian language can only really be employed in areas that affect us all equally, like in the area of government or if there were only a single media outlet (or perhaps even if there were an overwhelming consensus of opinion among the major news outlets). I hardly think FoxNews constitutes such a consensus.
At any rate, why not welcome alternative points of view? If all news that we did not experience firsthand comes to us filtered in some way, shouldn’t we want as many points of view as possible?