Next Question
RSS
While I am initially biased to think this is another fear-mongering tool, it does seem like a legitimately useful source of information (for those for whom it is relevant.)
Here are some of my thoughts:
-I feel better when I see it doesn't JUST list Islamic terrorist action (the Oklahoma City bombing is listed as an event in history on April 19th, 1995.
-It also doesn't seem like it's being heavily marketed (unlike some homeland security "what to do in this event"), which belies my mental attempt to make it out as fear-mongering, too.
-What it seems like is a highly niche-y document that might inadvertently increase fear among normal consumers but would be more likely to just feed into racial profiling with law enforcement and etc.
-It looks like the terrorist playing cards were far less professional looking, and had minimal information. This is definitely more useful and less gimmick-y seeming -- the planner itself is useful for those who need access to such information and would be a good way of organizing it. The website is accessible and professional.
So, in conclusion, it does seem to have potential downsides, but it also seems legitimately useful. It's nice to have a cumulative resource on a specific subject, and if you want to do a project on symptoms and treatment of anthrax for school, or want some dates to start on for a history paper, this could be a great resource.
Source(s):
http://www.nctc.gov/site/technical/index.html
http://www.nctc.gov/site/calendar/index.html
http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/01/11/nctc-releases-2009-counterterrorism...
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS175992+02-Jan-2008+PRN20080...
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/318943/nctc_releases_its_new_inter...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2003/pipc10042003.html
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1
January 14, 2009 12:27 AM
2009 Terrorism Calendar: Gimmicky, or useful?
The he National Counterterrorism Center has published an annual terrorism calendar every year since 2003. They claim that it is a useful tool on bad guys and bad chemical weapons, and can be a useful tool in the arsenal against the war on terror. It seems a bit gimmicky to me, like those terrorist playing cards.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| January 14, 2009 05:28 AM |
Here are some of my thoughts:
-I feel better when I see it doesn't JUST list Islamic terrorist action (the Oklahoma City bombing is listed as an event in history on April 19th, 1995.
-It also doesn't seem like it's being heavily marketed (unlike some homeland security "what to do in this event"), which belies my mental attempt to make it out as fear-mongering, too.
-What it seems like is a highly niche-y document that might inadvertently increase fear among normal consumers but would be more likely to just feed into racial profiling with law enforcement and etc.
-It looks like the terrorist playing cards were far less professional looking, and had minimal information. This is definitely more useful and less gimmick-y seeming -- the planner itself is useful for those who need access to such information and would be a good way of organizing it. The website is accessible and professional.
So, in conclusion, it does seem to have potential downsides, but it also seems legitimately useful. It's nice to have a cumulative resource on a specific subject, and if you want to do a project on symptoms and treatment of anthrax for school, or want some dates to start on for a history paper, this could be a great resource.
Source(s):
http://www.nctc.gov/site/technical/index.html
http://www.nctc.gov/site/calendar/index.html
http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/01/11/nctc-releases-2009-counterterrorism...
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS175992+02-Jan-2008+PRN20080...
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/318943/nctc_releases_its_new_inter...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2003/pipc10042003.html
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (1)
January 14, 2009 01:58 AM
Yeah, you hadn't mentioned it was free; however, capitalization and manipulation based on fear is what my answer was based on. Not solely on the fact that they could potentially make money. The fact that it's free and distributed by the government makes it propaganda, which is just as bad in my opinion if not worse.
Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
No questions found.
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- hunnybubby, November 30, 2009 08:41 PM
- jacorealane, November 30, 2009 08:35 PM
- gabriela, November 30, 2009 08:32 PM
- maryvallelonga, November 30, 2009 08:30 PM
- benditova, November 30, 2009 08:28 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/13/killer-calendar-feds-release-terror-planner/