I wouldn't buy any of them, because I already have these songs. Just because someone who is a musician dies, doesn't give you reason to buy their music. If you liked their music, you should've bought their music while they were still alive. I think that people buying music for this reason, are not buying it for the right reason. Why should an artist be more famous dead than alive? I don't understand this, but they say some people are worth more dead than alive. Why would anyone want to be dead and making money?

Here's an interesting article:

http://blog.taragana.com/e/2009/06/27/money-to-be-made-michael-jackson-like-elvis-may-be-worth-more-dead-than-alive-11849/
Permalink | Report

I wouldn't buy any, at least until I can figure out where the money would be going. If it's just going to the record company, I'd rather not buy it, but if some portion were going to charity I might consider it.
Permalink | Report

none... i'm a bit surprised about how positive this has gone down considering how controversial he has been with the kiddos. as a parent of young kids i find it hard to celebrate the life of a person that, although not convicted, certainly seemed to have been a deviant.
Permalink | Report