Next Question
It depends upon where you live and what you listen to. For me the answer is yes. I listen to public radio to hear classical and jazz. I am quite far from the stations. I stopped listening to FM because of the noisy reception until I bought an HD receiver. Since then I have not only been able to enjoy the two stations within range, but one of them has an extra channel that I can choose.
If you are getting good FM reception and enough stations now there may be no benefits. The actual sound is not higher fidelity.
I don't know about using HD in a car, it seems likely that reception would be difficult as you drive around.
Permalink | Report
If you don't have high-bandwidth internet at home than you probably also are not in range of an HD radio broadcaster.
Permalink | Report
http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com
HD Radio/IBOC is jamming our airways, especially on AM radio, with adjacent-channel interference. This is a scam to hijack our airways by iBiquity/HD Radio Alliance-owned larger stations, by jammig community-owned stations off the dial. HD Radio/IBOC is totally unnecesessary, as FMeXtra does the same thing, but without the adjacent-channel interference.
Consumers have zero interest in HD Radio, and the programming is many times, just clever reworks off the main analog channels. Terrestrial radio is trying to prop iteself up through HD Radio receiver sales. HD Radio suffers from dropouts, digital artifacts, and poor coverage - it's all in my blog.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| February 03, 2009 07:17 PM |
If you are getting good FM reception and enough stations now there may be no benefits. The actual sound is not higher fidelity.
I don't know about using HD in a car, it seems likely that reception would be difficult as you drive around.
| Asker's Rating: |
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (3)
February 03, 2009 08:55 PM
I'd say no - if you're in a car the noise of the car will cancel out improved reception - and if your at home you're better off streaming from the internet. If you don't have high-bandwidth internet at home than you probably also are not in range of an HD radio broadcaster.
Permalink | Report
February 03, 2009 10:39 PM
HD Radio is nothing but a farce! http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com
HD Radio/IBOC is jamming our airways, especially on AM radio, with adjacent-channel interference. This is a scam to hijack our airways by iBiquity/HD Radio Alliance-owned larger stations, by jammig community-owned stations off the dial. HD Radio/IBOC is totally unnecesessary, as FMeXtra does the same thing, but without the adjacent-channel interference.
Consumers have zero interest in HD Radio, and the programming is many times, just clever reworks off the main analog channels. Terrestrial radio is trying to prop iteself up through HD Radio receiver sales. HD Radio suffers from dropouts, digital artifacts, and poor coverage - it's all in my blog.
Permalink | Report
February 03, 2009 10:53 PM
Done! One other thing - iBiquity gets about $50 royalty fee for each HD Radio sold, so I hope this helps everyone in making their decisions to purchase HD radios. If you love radio, as I do, then I have already given you the answer.
Report
February 03, 2009 11:10 PM
Public radio in my area was among the first to broadcast in HD. They are not forced off the airwaves, they now have more channels that they can broadcast on. The station which could only broadcast either jazz or classical at one time can now broadcast both. And, the royalty can't be anywhere near $50 or the radios would be much more expensive. And if you can stand what they put on AM radio then now you can listen to it, the quality improvement for AM is great.
Report
February 03, 2009 11:23 PM
It's the smaller broadcasters who are suffering, such as Bob Savage WYSL 1020 AM radio in Rochester, NY - WBZ's IBUZZ adjacent-channel hash has cost Bob a large sports advertiser. NPR is a major problem, since CPB/NPR bilked Congress out of tens-of-millions in upgrades to thie useless, destructive technology:
"HD Radio: Fun with Math"
"I think it is fair to say that the audiophile community, those people who take their FM seriously, is dead set AGAINST HDRadio. Not only do most people never intend to buy a radio, unless as a plaything for early adopters and collectors, but are aghast at the FCC for even allowing IBOC to thrash up the FM bandwidth. Plus, people with enough technical savvy to read the specs are insulted by the false claims of 'CD sound quality' or even 'near-CD sound quality'. These are transparent marketing hype, beyond mean puffery. Sorry, but HDRadio has sworn enemies. This goes beyond just business but has political reprecussions for FCC and for Congress. This has the whiff of political scandal - and I'm a rock-ribbed Republican! The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is especially vulnerable. My advice for any businessman is to avoid any association with HDRadio."
http://hear2.com/2006/06/hd_radio_fun_wi.html
NPR shoud be boycotted.
Report
"HD Radio: Fun with Math"
"I think it is fair to say that the audiophile community, those people who take their FM seriously, is dead set AGAINST HDRadio. Not only do most people never intend to buy a radio, unless as a plaything for early adopters and collectors, but are aghast at the FCC for even allowing IBOC to thrash up the FM bandwidth. Plus, people with enough technical savvy to read the specs are insulted by the false claims of 'CD sound quality' or even 'near-CD sound quality'. These are transparent marketing hype, beyond mean puffery. Sorry, but HDRadio has sworn enemies. This goes beyond just business but has political reprecussions for FCC and for Congress. This has the whiff of political scandal - and I'm a rock-ribbed Republican! The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is especially vulnerable. My advice for any businessman is to avoid any association with HDRadio."
http://hear2.com/2006/06/hd_radio_fun_wi.html
NPR shoud be boycotted.
February 03, 2009 11:27 PM
"RadioShack's Inadequate Accurian"
"This is the cheapest HD Radio receiver now on the market, but even at $200 it's too expensive given its subpar sound... Instead of developing a radio capable of superior sound quality, I'm guessing that RadioShack paid iBiquity a fortune for the license, cheaply put together a subpar product, and passed the licensing cost on to consumers."
http://tinyurl.com/685yfr
"The ongoing tragedy of HD radio"
"Supposedly, it costs a manufacturer about $50 to implant an iBiquity HD chip into a radio, thus transforming it into an HD radio. That $50 (or so) is the fee the manufacturer pays to iBiquity."
http://www.hear2.com/2007/10/the-ongoing-tra.html
Most HD radios are close to $100, so when you see a rebate from the scammers at iBiquity, they are getting desperate enough to waive their royalty fees. Of course, not every one ends up getting their rebates... hmmmm...
Report
"This is the cheapest HD Radio receiver now on the market, but even at $200 it's too expensive given its subpar sound... Instead of developing a radio capable of superior sound quality, I'm guessing that RadioShack paid iBiquity a fortune for the license, cheaply put together a subpar product, and passed the licensing cost on to consumers."
http://tinyurl.com/685yfr
"The ongoing tragedy of HD radio"
"Supposedly, it costs a manufacturer about $50 to implant an iBiquity HD chip into a radio, thus transforming it into an HD radio. That $50 (or so) is the fee the manufacturer pays to iBiquity."
http://www.hear2.com/2007/10/the-ongoing-tra.html
Most HD radios are close to $100, so when you see a rebate from the scammers at iBiquity, they are getting desperate enough to waive their royalty fees. Of course, not every one ends up getting their rebates... hmmmm...
February 04, 2009 02:03 AM
I don't know what your axe to grind is but you are completely distorting the discussion of HD radio. I looked into this Mr Savage thing and he is an operator of a tiny 500 watt station which could only be heard 20 miles away AM at night and now suffers more interference at night. Who cares? For the normal listener HD is an advantage using FM and a big advantage using AM. The problem that AM really has is that it sounded so bad for so long that now its stations only broadcast stuff that sounds bad no matter what. If HD catches on we may have decent AM stations again someday.
Report
February 04, 2009 02:10 AM
I love it! I knew someone would step up to the plate and tell me "that I had an axe to grind" and "completely distorting the discussion of HD radio"! Perhaps, you work for NPR, iBiquity, or the HD Alliance? Too late - my blog has gotten about 15,000 hits in six months from over 75 countries!
Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
No questions found.
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- sethdavis, November 26, 2009 10:45 PM
- alligator768, November 26, 2009 10:12 PM
- purplechunsa, November 26, 2009 10:00 PM
- falc, November 26, 2009 09:47 PM
- ashley7237, November 26, 2009 09:07 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

http://boards.radio-info.com/smf/index.php/board,194.0.html