Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.
Next Question

Answered Question

gno gno
 
M$2.25 August 28, 2009 12:34 PM

Should I buy an Ipod, or a different MP3 player?

My 2005 Ipod died this year. Sad. And I'm looking to buy a replacement MP3 player. I need your advice! Ipod? What type of Ipod? Other MP3 player?

Price should preferably not be over $200-300.

I want something with a LOT of music storage space, but don't need a whole bunch of other bells and whistles like video, or phones, or cameras, or god know what else. Toasters?

I currently run all my music out of ITunes, so if you recommend something other than Ipod, please let me know what kind of program I'd need to use, and how well you like it.

Size of the unit isn't terribly important - as long as it's not so tiny that I lose it easily (don't want to wash it in my pocket!).

And lastly, quality is important. I want something reliable that I can count on for years and years.

Pretty is also good.

The Best Answer will be anyone who can address all of these major concerns and give me some good advice based on research, and hopefully personal experience as well! Thank you!
Interesting Question?  Yes (2)   No (0)   

Interesting: chriswingate M$0.15, brian san M$0.10

RSS
 
 

Best Answer  Chosen by Asker

 
August 28, 2009 04:37 PM
You can certainly get more bang for your buck with other MP3 brands than going with the Apple equivalents. But while you get might get more storage, more features etc for the same price, will you get the same ease of use, and the same pleasure in owning and using the device?

The iPod has about 70% of the market share for MP3 players in the US, and the reasons for that are:

- Ease of use, with the best designed user interfaces
- Aesthetic appeal - looks good, feels good to hold, etc
- Branding - Want to feel like one of the cool kids? Or avoid that? :)
- Plethora of accessories... docking stations, speakers, cases, you name it
- Compatiblity - a site like eMusic works slickly with iPods and iTunes cos so many people have them, maybe not so well with other brands

So, personally if I wasn't tight for money, I would go with an iPod.

Which one is right for you depends on what exactly you want from it.

The iPod Classic has huge storage, and is the one for hard-core music lovers that want to carry an enormous library around.

The iPod Nano has pretty big storage by the standard of Ye Olde Days, back when you last bought an iPod. So it might do nicely.

The iPod Touch is a brilliant device, and much more than a media player. It may not be what you want if music is all you care about, but a lot of people think this is the future and stand-alone music players are a dying breed. But be aware there may be a big upgrade coming real soon to the "iTouch".

Want even more info on choosing?

Guess what, Mahalo is here to help! :)

The Top 7 links from my iPod page give you a lot of info on the different iPods, and which one is right for you.

I made a Cheap iPod page that has pointers on how to get the best deals. Or at least not end up paying a fortune for a model that is about to be superceded! :)

There's also an MP3 Player Deals page which will help you check out alternatives and compare prices. I haven't managed that one long, so I can't vouch for it like I can the other two that I've worked on for a while and made sure have good info.

And if you have more iPod questions, I'm sure the community, including me, will be glad to help.
Asker's Rating:
• It was really difficult to pick a best answer out of all the exceptional and helpful answers. But I picked philipy for completeness in his answer to the questions. The links were also helpful.

Thanks a bunch @philipy. I looks like the IPond Nano is the winner but we will be awaiting any announcements at the next Apple event that may push a larger sized Touch in our price range if the Nano is not given a capacity upgrade.


Tags: player, ipod, apple, mp3

Helpful Answer?  (3)   (0)   

Helpful: gno, brian san, jeffhoard

Tip philipy for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 

Other Answers (16)

Sort By
 
August 28, 2009 12:57 PM
It's hard to convince yourself to switch over from the iPod brand.

I had a very good experience with a Microsoft Zune... they are often a little bit cheaper than iPods for pretty much the same feature set. I also found the Zune software to be a little faster and little more intuitive than the iPod software. However, if you're interested in PURCHASING music, then iTunes tend to be a little more useful than the Zune Martketplace.

But there are other benefits to using an iPod, and this mainly comes from third party accessories. The Zune, while being a little more cost effective than the iPod, felt like you were the only left-handed person in a right hand world. I would go the gym and see iPod connection on the equipment, then frown uselessly at my Zune, blaming it for my general lack of fitting in to society. There are a handful of Zune accessories, but the iPod is becoming a cultural norm.

If you're interested in something much cheaper, with entirely different features and benefits, then look into the HCT brand of media players. HCT is a Korean company that puts out very affordable electronics, but they tend to approach them a little differently. I had an HCT media player that was very easy to use, but it broke rather easily. Be warned. The best part of the HCT player was that I didn't really need any software at all... just hook it up to the computer and drag files into the appropriate folder.

You have a lot of options in the media player world... my ~personal~ recommendation is to bite the bullet and accept that Apple has managed to dominate this playing field. Find a model of iPod that best fits your needs and go with that. (I would, however, avoid the newest iPod shuffle at all costs because it wins hands-down for worst user interface ever).

Helpful Answer?  (2)   (0)   

Helpful: gno, stanar

Tip teflashfire for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 01:01 PM
I would go for a Zune HD. It is coming out very soon, and, in my opinion, it is the best looking MP3 player in the world. It comes with 8GB in the basic model, and will resell for about 250$.

As for syncing your music, Zune has a wireless capability, so if you have a laptop that supports it, it is pretty painless. You don't need iTunes to transfer music, you can just use drag and drop!


Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)   

Helpful: stanar

Tip onek for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 01:06 PM
I'll be honest with you... the wireless syncing ability of the Zune was not an experience that I enjoyed. Every time I entered the room with my Zune, my computer would freak out about the new wireless device getting connected... the Zune software would start it's rather lengthy startup, etc etc.

The Zune HD does look like a slick little device... but I suspect that watching HD content in itty-bitty-eye-straino-vision is hardly a priority for the asker.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 01:08 PM
I would look into the iPod Touch. It's in your price range and you can keep your existing iTunes format. If you consider WiFi a toaster maybe it's not for you, but it does make managing you music and many other things much easier. You may find you like getting music, pod casts and other info directly on to your device.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip campww for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 01:15 PM
I enjoy my iPhone (basically an iPod + cellphone), and it IS nice to get your content directly on to your device.

But the asker did specifically say that they want LARGE storage space (largest iPod Touch is 32 GB, placed our of her price range), and didn't really care for the extra bells and whistles. Perhaps a lower-range Zune?

Report
 
 
gno gno
 
August 28, 2009 01:33 PM
Yeah, @teflashfire, thanks for watching my back here. Yep, I need something with lots of storage. In fact, I wish one of these companies would just release something nice and sturdy with a whole lot of storage, stamp it $200, and call it a day. To me WiFi is a toaster. I just won't use it, and don't want to go out of my way to pay extra for it.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 01:29 PM
I would go for the iPod Touch. Sounds like it's the right size, price and the touch screen and "apps" are a great bonus. Pretty much anyone is going to find an app you "can't live without".

> Price should preferably not be over $200-300.
The 16 GB iPod Touch is under $300. The 8 GB is under $230.

> I want something with a LOT of music storage space, but don't need a whole bunch of other bells and whistles like video, or phones, or cameras, or god know what else. Toasters?
It doesn't have a built-in camera, but it's great for storing pictures and showing them to someone with short notice. (And the picture are more current than the ones I've carried in my wallet! :-)

> I currently run all my music out of ITunes, so if you recommend something other than Ipod, please let me know what kind of program I'd need to use, and how well you like it.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

> Size of the unit isn't terribly important - as long as it's not so tiny that I lose it easily (don't want to wash it in my pocket!).
Since most of the dimensions of it are the touch screen, the size isn't wasted.

> And lastly, quality is important. I want something reliable that I can count on for years and years.
Good quality. The main concern here is the screen, especially if you happen to drop things frequently.

> Pretty is also good.
Sleek looking device.
Source(s):
http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/specs.html


Tags: ipod

Helpful Answer?  (2)   (0)   

Helpful: gno, neilsadwelkar

Tip rsimpson for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 04:07 PM
I love the iPod Touch but whether that's suitable depends on what @gno meant by "a lot of storage space". iPod Classic could be a better fit.

Report
 
 
gno gno
 
August 28, 2009 06:28 PM
Size-wise, 16gb is about as low as I'd go. Anything above that in my price range, with all the other considerations, is gravy.

Report
 
 
gno gno
 
August 28, 2009 06:30 PM
And I have to say, I'm a little hesitant to go with the iPod Classic. That's what I had from 2005, and it just stopped working for no apparent reason. I'd like the next one to last more than 4 years with reasonable care, if possible.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 07:07 PM
iPod nano then - 16GB $199. less chance of flaking in my opinion.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 07:36 PM
@gno... if worried about life, players that use flash-based memory instead of a hard-disk don't have a lot that can go wrong with them. Hard-disks are mechanical and like all things mechanical, wear and tear and generally misbehave and break down over a period of time. Flash memory is all electronics, with no moving parts, and lasts well.

The trouble is a 32GB iPod Touch goes for $399, a 120 GB iPod Classic for only $249. If you can live with 16GB, the flash-based iPod Nano is $199 at the moment.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 01:51 PM
It actually sounds like the iPod "Classic" is most likely what you want. If you don't need "bells and whistles" then I'm assuming video really isn't a big deal to you. If you don't need video, I think the iPod Touch isn't the best storage value (16 GB iTouch for $229 works out to $14.31/GB, 120 GB Classic for $250 works out to $2.08/GB).

The iPod Classic is $250 for 120 GB. You can get the Microsoft Zune for $229 (120 GB model), but then you have to move all your music around. I'm sure there are others that offer some better storage for the money, but again, you have to move all your music. To me, it's worth some money not to have to move all my music around.

Also, if you bring in your old iPod to an Apple store and recycle it, they'll give you 10% off your new one (http://bit.ly/68rie - now your price is $225).

If you are looking to save a few bucks and are willing, you could also consider a refurbished model (http://bit.ly/ev4K2c). I'm not sure it's worth the savings, but depending on how tight cash is, it might be an option.
Source(s):
http://store.apple.com/us
http://www.zune.com


Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)   

Helpful: geekmiser

Tip mrcal for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 02:17 PM
I've used other devices, but since you are managing all of your music through iTunes, just stick with iPod. This is the best answer in my opinion, I definitely agree with mrcal.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 02:33 PM
I just wanted to address your statement "quality is important. I want something reliable that I can count on for years and years." This doesn't equate to lots of storage. You might want to wait for awhile.

iPod is the best MP3 player to work with iTunes. You're familiar with it, it is pretty, has a great interface. You won't have to go through the huge effort of changing your entire music library away from iTunes since it won't reliably sync with any other devices.

Today, iPods with a lot of storage are still coming with magnetic, spinning hard drives. So, if you want more than 32GB or storage (in the iPod Touch, which is a heck of a lot) and want to go with 60GB or more, you're stuck with storage that has moving parts in it. Moving parts draw more battery power. Moving parts, like the heads and platters of a hard drive, tend to break. Especially when you move them around a lot. My roommate used to but iPods (he had to buy a lot of them) but broke them all the time because he's not very gentle with them. I turned him on to the iPod Nano, that uses flash memory (no moving parts) and he hasn't broken it since. However, the iPod Nano probably doesn't have enough storage for you (16 GB max at $199) - depending on your library. If your music library is smaller than 16GB consider the iPod Nano.

Let me give you this caveat. All hard drives fail, its just a matter of when and how. Hopefully, they don't fail before you've replaced the device. Solid state hard drives fail as well, but they theoretically only fail after a certain (very very high) number of writes to the same location on the drive. So, theoretically, your music library won't be changing frequently except for new stuff. Go for solid state and you'll probably have a device that lasts you a lot longer than one that doesn't have solid state. And since you're not interested in video, the state of the music on the device won't change much - granting you use well beyond that of a laptop with a solid state drive (likely).

The iPod Classic is still using magnetic drives, but I am predicting they will switch to solid state very soon. All of their other models sport them.

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip geekmiser for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 02:57 PM
Hi Gno,

I would suggest an iPod Classic or iPod Nano
If you are a heavy iTunes user, than I think that makes the most sense.
The Classic hold much more music for the money than the Nano but has a hard drive inside that is less durable than the Nano which uses flash memory.
I've seen videos of Nanos being run over by a car and still working.

BUT

Don't buy anything just yet!

Apple is widely expected to release their new iPod lineup next month (September 2009). Don't fall into the same predicament as I did by buying an iPod right before they replace it with a better model.

Source(s):
http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=112002S5DW0W


Tags: ipod, apple, nano, classic

Helpful Answer?  (2)   (0)   

Helpful: gno, robbrown

Tip brian san for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
gno gno
 
August 28, 2009 03:02 PM
Oooh, thanks for letting me know! I had no idea a new line was about to be released.

Of course, then the prices are going to be sky-high for the newer models. But maybe that means the prices will fall on the ones that are "current" right now.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 03:06 PM
great point on the new lineup. the prices on the "classics" seem to go down (particularly on a "per GB" basis) when they announce the new ones.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 03:18 PM
Actually, the prices probably will be around the same as the prices of the current models now. They tend to keep the iPod Classic and Nano under the prices of the iPod Touch. Though who knows what will happen next month. There are rumors of everything from an Apple Tablet to a Nano with a camera and so forth.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 04:08 PM
They release new models quite often, but we're coming up to the time of year when we're mostly likely to see a refresh of the iPod Nano and iPod Touch at least, and maybe the whole range.

That means you can either buy the latest shiny new one, or get a great deal on the ones that have suddenly become last year's model.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 07:09 PM
yes, I advise waiting but don't go based on rumors - i've been hearing about an apple tablet for years and they haven't said peep except "we're never releasing a tablet"

Report
 
 
 
August 30, 2009 03:41 AM
Here's another article talking about how SKUS for current model iPods are disappearing. So new ones in September are almost certain.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 04:37 PM
i would go for sony mp3 wireless walkman.

the features are:
The MP3 player market is full of innovative gadgets, and the new Sony Walkman NWZ-W202 is one such device. Most of the wireless
MP3 player uses the stereo Bluetooth
technology but the Sony goes one step beyond that by building the MP3 player inside the headphones. The W202 solves all the issues of a wireless MP3 player that arises due to the problem of RF and Bluetooth.

The $69 Sony Walkman NWZ-W202 is designed with earbud-style headphones and provides storage of 2GB. The music player comes in two color variants – pink and black.

The W202 consists of two rectangular-shaped audio modules. Each audio module is 2 inches long, 0.8-inch wide and 0.4-inch deep. Both modules are attached with each other with the help of a flexible neckband. Weighing just 1.3 ounces, the W202 is the smallest and lightest MP3 player available in the market at the moment.

Though the device is very small, there is no issue regarding the secure fit. You don’t need to worry that the device would fall while jogging, walking or jumping as it fits securely in the ears. The device comes with three pairs of different sized silicone eartips, one of which will definitely fit your ears.

As the music player is built inside the earphones, the user interface has to be untraditional. As there is not screen, the navigation becomes a bit tricks and it requires a lot of time to get used to. By default, the W202 plays the music in alphanumeric order but you can also play the music in shuffle mode by pressing the dedicated shuffle control, which is located inside the right earpiece. The bottom spine of the right earpiece houses all the controls, which include volume rocker and jog dial.

As expected, there are very few extras other than the basic audio playback. But there are a few niceties such as a feature which Sony calls Zappin. This unique feature allows you to browse through the songs by playing a snippet of the chorus of each track.

The snippet can be as long as 10 seconds, and if you want to play a song while listening to the snippets, just press the jog button. Another unique feature is the “quick-charge”, which provides 90 minutes of audio playback with a mere recharge of 3 minutes. Last but not the least; you just need to stick both the earpiece together to power off the device. The W202 supports MP3, AAC, and WMA music file formats. The W202 has rated battery life of 12 hours.


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip kumaran1993 for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 04:47 PM
I think you should wait for a few months. Signs are pointing that a New I pod Touch is coming out. The original is a very great device with Wifi, games and lots of cool apps. it can hold tons of songs (32GB). If you wait for a while, there will be an I pod touch with a camera on it. I think that it will be worth it to wait.

It will be around $250-$300 for a 16 GB.

Here is a report about the "New" I pod touch with a camera.

Also below is a size comparison compared to the other I pods.

Source(s):
http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/26/september-9-ipod-event-gets-some-corrobo...


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip redsoxfan3439 for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 05:09 PM
The only reason you would buy any of the two mentioned is if you can not live with the simpler things in life, but if you want to be modern and have the latest and greatest, that is your decision, no offense intended, but the indians have a saying, "When the last animal has been hunted! The last fish, has been fished! The last vegetable farmed! Only then will you realize you can not eat your currency!"

My advice is not to spend at all, for tough times are ahead! Do not be one of the wealthy that spend and spend, and then when they are broke, look back at all they money they wished they would have saved! I speak this only in kindness, not to be intepreted as an insult! Do as your heart wishes, but in the end, realize when you have no food, that you can not eat your mp3 player!

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (2)   

Unhelpful: mshubin, tchachra

Tip harold5187 for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
gno gno
 
August 28, 2009 06:42 PM
You know, @harold5187, I really appreciate that advice actually. It's a very good reminder sometimes that the simpler things in life are what's important.

But in this case, I'm still moving forward, and I'll be happy to explain why and how it maybe folds into your philosophy:

There are tough times ahead, and I take nothing for granted. But I have some spare (Mahalo) money and feel like a treat is in order. Listening to music is my zen. It allows me to connect with nature, meditate better, and I listen to it while working on sewing projects, crafting, gardening. You know, good old world work-with-your-bare-hands projects. Good for the soul! Especially in bad times...

(and the headphones are important since I have a toddler who naps!)

I really don't buy iPods to "keep up with the Jones's" or to feel tech-cool. I don't have a fancy stereo. I don't drive expensive cars. And while most professionals my age live in mini-mansions, I live in a little 1400 sq. foot ranch from 1970. I don't load my yard with trendy kids toys and play structures - just the basic swingset and sand box. Basics and nature are important to me.

But so's my music. So sometime soon, I will indulge, like a good bubble bath. It's going to be a birthday gift to myself (September 9 - 9/9/09!) and I feel good about spending my Mahalo dollars on this treat.

Honestly, thank you for the perspective though. :)

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 06:04 PM
Microsoft has currently announced that the Zune HD will be available on 9/15/09 with a price tag of $289 for the 32gb Version.

I would honestly wait for this product to be released as all of the technology reviews on it have been fantastic.

I dont see if you are an apple user or a windows user...but if on Windows the Zune software will convert all of your iTunes songs to the Windows format and take your playlists too. You can then subscribe to a Zune pass for $15 per month and download music freely....you get to keep 10 songs per month..so in essence your cost is $5 a month to download as much as you want and build your library for permanent use by 10 songs a month. Awesome deal no.

So again....if you are on Windows - buy a Zune HD. If on MAC, stick with an iPod classic REFURBISHED from http://apple.com (bottom left of store page).

Hope that helps.

Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)   

Helpful: gno

Tip tchachra for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
gno gno
 
August 28, 2009 06:44 PM
Good advice, thanks @tchachra! I'm going to look into Zune, and I had no idea about Zune passes!

Oh, and welcome to Mahalo!

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 06:49 PM
Thanks @gno
Glad you liked my response. The zune pass is truly wonderful.... I have had and have ipod's but the price of music via Apple/Amazon/Walmart is a bit much. Its easier for me to justify $15 a month, keep 10 songs, and download as much as I can imagine...as long as I pay my monthly I can keep all songs alive.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 06:53 PM
Sorry for posting yet again..but here is the info on the zune pass:

http://www.zune.net/en-us/software/zunepass/default.htm

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 07:55 PM
The average iPod user buys less than 10 songs a year from iTunes.

If you really are the type to buy 10 a month, then a pass of some kind is a good idea. Be aware of what will happen if sometime you want to stop paying for the pass or get a different device or whatever. Often a lot of the pass deals are set up so you will lose access to your music at that point. i.e. You never really bought a song, you just paid a subscription to be able to listen.

Another thing to consider is that the iPod Touch has apps like Pandora, Last.fm and now Spotify, that allow you to access lots of music without buying it.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 08:02 PM
The ZUNE HD will be getting applications soon and lets not forget...with the $15 pass you get to own 10 songs a month and listen to as many songs as you can handle every month....dont like em, dont keep em, but you are entitled to the whole library.

Report
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 06:28 PM
I have found, there is no alternative to an apple Ipod, some stuff comes close but there is always something about the original.

Think of it as a Natural Diamond to a Man made Diamond. Both are the same purpose but one just has that little chill factor.

(If you are looking at buying an Apple Ipod let me know I might be able to help you)

If you use Itunes already apple will make it easier to keep up with what you know.

Almost every apple has all the bells and whistles though (trust me you might not care now but when you get it youll love them).

You will want an Ipod that has about 8Gigs of memory (I have probably 700 or so songs + Tons of other crap on my 8 gig and I am just about at 1/2 full).

64 gigs is more for people who have movies and apps.

An Ipod touch (I have that) will cost around $230 + Tax from the website (free shipping and free engraving).

The batteries also kick BUTT on Ipods (Ill go not charging my for about 2 days on and off).

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip rishiku for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 28, 2009 10:58 PM
I think the iPod Nano is a good fit for your needs. It is attractive, low cost, works with iTunes, and comes in a variety of colors. If you need more space I would recommend getting the 16gb Nano which costs $199, just under your budget. I would recommend waiting 2 or 3 weeks though as Apple is rumored to be releasing new iPods and this usually results in price drops (and also a rumored camera). Although there are some great MP3 players the fact that you use iTunes means that an iPod will fit best into your work flow.
Source(s):
http://www.macrumors.com/2009/08/28/apple-resellers-report-ipod-stocks-dwin...
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipod/family/ipod_nano?mco=MTE2NT...


Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip kmcgrady for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 29, 2009 03:11 AM
I pods are generally more expensive, but you get that satisfaction of having that top notch product. You can definitely get more of your money's worth with other brands. If short on money try generics on E bay or Craig's List. As with most of us, we let our electronics get scratched up in time for the next generation of the electronic gadget, so I'd say as long as it gets the job done for a reasonable price.
Peace! :)

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip relive2usfate for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 30, 2009 01:21 PM
Wait until 9/9, when Apple has a music event scheduled. It is likely that you will be able to get a 32GB iPod Touch in your price range at that point.

The Touch is head and shoulders above anything else on the market, primarily because it is a very useful computer in addition to being an audio and video player. The number and usefulness of the apps available in the App Store is amazing, and they are very cheap or often free. I routinely carry dozens of books and games, train schedules for every teansit system within hundreds of miles, a guitar tuner/metronome/chord chart, etc.

I don't even think the ZuneHD is going to be competitive on price and features after 9/9, but it has some additional downsides as well. The iPods will work on Mac or Windows, the Zune Windows only. The Zune Marketplace is simply one of the worst pieces of software I have ever used, it needs a major rewrite to get to adequate. I would love to see some other MP3 player do well, competition is good for us consumers, but the Zune isnt there yet.

Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)   

Helpful: gno

Tip bdegrande for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
August 30, 2009 11:46 PM
Hi
iPod is probably the first choice but there may be another option for you but you should take the following into account.

iPod
will give you plenty of storage for a pretty big library but you can always split libraries down in iTunes by using play lists or smart playlists because i am a believer that you cant ever need to carry 60Gb of tunes in your pocket.

The iPod classic is a pretty solid unit with plenty of storage up to 120Gb

http://www.apple.com/ipodclassic/

you are used to using iTunes so wouldn't need to switch to another app for transferring all of your tunes over to the new player if it wasn't an iPod.

Alternatives

Cowon - S9
up to 32Gb and very stylish
easy transfer of files from PC as the unit is identified as a disk so you can load your files right on

http://www.cowonglobal.com/

has an FM radio
Sound EQ
touch screen

or you could wait for the Zune HD

http://social.zune.net/home.aspx?culture=en-us

I had a Cowon and an iPod touch before and both were great i have never dabbled in the Zune world and i don't think the last version got very good press so it lok like you will have to take a bite from the apple

:)

happy hunting
Source(s):
www.apple.com
www.zune.net
http://www.cowonglobal.com/


Tags: player, ipod, zune, mp3

Helpful Answer?  (0)   (0)    Tip gpthestar for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 

Answer this Question

How tips and payments work

This question has already been resolved. You may add an answer to it but you will not be eligible to win best answer or any associated tips.

Ask a Question


140 characters left
Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • buddawiggi
    buddawiggi
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    27543 Points
    M$789.91 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt
    4443 Points
    M$196.22 Earned
  • annelisle
    annelisle
    Purple Belt
    2997 Points
    M$91.22 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1620)
iphone(465)
music(461)
google(357)
food(321)
online(295)
beer(279)
money(262)
movies(258)
apple(251)
aotd(235)
health(220)
video(208)
free(205)
dog(205)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members


 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.