Next Question
Without a doubt the worst movie I've ever seen is Eragon. Maybe, if I hadn't read the book before watching the movie, I would have thought the movie succeeded in mediocrity. Unfortunately, I did read the book. If it hadn't been for the fact that they share the same name, I would have thought the movie was based off a different book. In the movie they cut out major plot points such as the twins, the urgals in Farthen Dur, and then screw up a bunch of other details. For example, when Eragon fights Durza, he is at the bottom of a tower in the book and Arya is helping. In the movie he is flying around on Saphira, while Durza flies around on a cloud dragon and tosses fireballs at him. Still, even without the fact that it had a seriously misguided plot, the action scenes sucked, the acting sucked, and the only good thing is that they screwed up the first one so bad they won't be able to make the sequel, Eldest.
Permalink | Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKNZqnJ0hzU&feature=related
Permalink | Report
It's also know as National Lampoon's Lady Killers.
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Lampoon%27s_Gold_Diggers
Permalink | Report
krystyne20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBRV7wGt3jU
You can also watch the whole thing on Youtube. At least you won't have to pay to leave.
Permalink | Report
Luckily it was a rental and I could leave and go into another room and read.
My wife eventually forgave me.
Permalink | Report
Every so often a group of my friends get together for a 'Bad Movie Night' and thus far the reigning champion has to be "Death Bed: The Bed That Eats" - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0385639/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMkxVmLHIMk
Here is a slightly NSFW review of the movie as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3_KqAW_29w
Permalink | Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-7iv6-8BRw
It actually won six Razzies:
Worst actor
Worst Actress
Worst Screen Couple (Bennifer - the start of the word couple name trend)
Worst Director
Worst Screenplay
Source(s):
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,596113,00.html
Permalink | Report
This damaged a group of us so badly that we became a local MST 3000, openly laughing at the rubbish movies put out around that time.
Permalink | Report
Starring Madonna (well, she is a STAR)
The movie that gave them an excuse to go to Greece.
Swept away
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuJcTVfuGkA
Bad, boring and offensive.
I coulndn't even finish it.
Permalink | Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjsA0_arKtk
Permalink | Report
There are some movies that are just dumb, and the people who make them know they are dumb, and people watch them when they want a dumb movie. Fine. No harm, no foul. In fact, a really campy bad movie can be enjoyable.
But some movies are awful but miss the so-awful-it's-hilarious chance at redemption. These movies insult the intelligence of the audience, and bore the audience while simultaneously trying to evoke great pity for and admiration of its characters. So here are the main reason why _Ransom_ is the worst movie I have ever seen (and keep in mind that I saw the Dukes of Hazzard remake). Spoiler alert: if you like horrible movies and want to see this one, don't read below.
1) A bad movie lacks talented actors. A truly horrible movie wastes great talents on horrible characterizations and plots. Mel Gibson, Gary Sinise, Lili Taylor, and Rene Russo are the actors, Ron Howard the director. Huge waste of talent. I actually felt pity for these rich and famous people.
2) The whole plot is a ridiculously convoluted mess. An elaborate yet uninteresting plot involving crooked cops working with criminals to kidnap a rich guy's kid. Every twist that was supposed to be mind-bending was either predictable or heavy-handed. The climactic scene was the a-hole businessman (Gibson) being inexplicably hardass when he figured out who the kidnapper was. After the kidnapper came to his house to collect the award for finding the kidnapper. And the little boy wet himself. Because criminal masterminds are idiots. And by this scene you are so unengaged with the suspension of disbelief that you don't feel sorry for the traumatized child character. You do sort of feel sorry for the child actor who has to go back to school after playing this part, though.
3) Character motivations make no sense. Mel Gibson's character decides to make a series of moves that would in real life get his kid killed right away. These flat characters are a big part of why the plotline is so ludicrous.
4)Female characters are all useless idiots. Rene Russo is helpless; she has no say in the situation, and her husband doesn't even think about what she thinks is the right move in protecting her son. When she does go against his wishes it goes very badly, and the kidnapper even acts aggressively in a semi-sexualized way. In other words, the father who doesn't listen to the authorities is a badass, The mother who does the same is a fool who puts herself in danger.
5) The nuanced actor Gary Sinise plays a caricature not a character.
6) There was just enough suspense to make you feel unpleasant, but not enough to keep it compelling.
Permalink | Report
I did see Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, though. Holy cow, where does one even begin with a movie like that? It's clear that they made it just to cash in on the genuinely good first movie. And they went at the script with only one thing in mind: "How do we fit as many characters from the game in as possible?"
The answer? "By having 90% of them do nothing of note." There were so many characters, most of who(m?) looked awful. Shao Khan was especially bad. His actor always looked like every line he spoke could potentially make him go to the bathroom in his pants. The story was nonexistent and the CGI was atrocious. I went in knowing nothing about it save that I had lots of fun with the first movie, which is actually the only video game movie I'd call any good at all. And I left ANGRY. I had wasted good money on that movie. I was mad at the writers for churning out such bad dialogue, the film makers for producing it, and myself for SEEING it.
Permalink | Report
Very Bad Things had it all - bad acting, bad plot, gratuitous almost-nudity. It was one step up from a softcore porn you'd see on Cinemax. Except that it wasn't even *good* softcore porn. It was just horrible.
Erin Brocknovich is the only movie I can remember actually leaving the theatre in the middle. A movie about a woman who just keeps making ridiculously bad choices, of her own accord, that we're somehow supposed to consider the heroine. A friend and I went to see it. 30 minutes into the movie, as we were both trying to poke our eyes out, the Dirty Biker Dude moved in next door. We looked at each other, and agreed - if she ends up sleeping with him, which would make NO SENSE and be completely contradictory to everything she's claiming she wants to do and be another ridiculously bad hcoice, then we're walking out. 10 minutes later, we walked out.
Source(s):
personal opinion
Permalink | Report
So, if something was made with the expectation that they would be good.. and a lot of effort was put in... these are the ones that are most disappointing..
I'm surprised nobody has listed these yet...
Howard the Duck. A fairly decent comic book character, expected to be good based on the content of the comics. MILLIONS spent in production. $37-39 million dollars spent in 1986, which was a lot for a film at the time. according to http://www.filmsite.org/80sintro.html "the average film budget was over $18 million" So, if the average is just north of 18 millon.. one can see that it was a lot of money to spend on a film at the time. It basically killed the career of it's writing team and director, two people who had previously written American Graffiti and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom among others. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_the_Duck_(film)
Leonard Part 6 -- so bad it makes you wonder what happened to parts 1-5. So bad that Bill Cosby who wrote, produced and starred in the thing was panning the movie on tv and in interviews before it even came out! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Part_6
I will leave it up to everyone else to look up how many razzies and other bad reviews these films got. Let's just say, they didn't go.. unnoticed as bad.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
Two hours stolen from my soul.
Permalink | Report
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nights_in_rodanthe
Permalink | Report
If you pulled out just the coolest fight scenes and patched them together you could make an awesome 3-5 minute video clip, but as a feature length movie this was painfully embarrassing to watch.
300 dethroned Swordfish as the worst movie I've ever.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| March 20, 2009 12:29 AM |
| Asker's Rating: |
• Oh my... I completely forgot about that one.
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (26)
March 20, 2009 12:08 AM
As much as I love Adam Sandler I have to say the worst movie I have ever seen is his Going Overboard. If you haven't watched it please take my word for it. I always try and at least finish a movie if I don't like it, I need to be able to say I sat through it. This I couldn't make it halfway through. Its horrible!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKNZqnJ0hzU&feature=related
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 12:12 AM
National Lampoon's Gold Diggers. When I saw that Rotten Tomatoes had given it 0%, I had to give it a try. Anything that has no positive reviews has to be deliciously bad. It didn't disappoint (or did disappoint, rather. You know what I mean). It's a whole new level of horrible. Try reading the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes- some of them are hilarious. It's also know as National Lampoon's Lady Killers.
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Lampoon%27s_Gold_Diggers
Permalink | Report
krystyne20
March 20, 2009 03:39 PM
Hey! I loved that movie!
Tip krystyne20 for this comment
Report
March 20, 2009 12:30 AM
Hands down...Santa Clause Conquers The Martians. When I was in college, the Student Association had an annual event where they showed the worst movies made to date. It was free to get in, but you had to pay to leave. This one was the one that cleared the theatre every time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBRV7wGt3jU
You can also watch the whole thing on Youtube. At least you won't have to pay to leave.
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 01:04 AM
Titanic. Yes, the Kate and Leo one. It was wretched and LOOONGGG. About 3 hours into the movie I checked the time and realized that, in fact, only 1 1/4 hours had elapsed and there was almost 2 hours of film remaining. Most terrible movies would be wrapping it up at that point but this turkey was just getting rolling. Luckily it was a rental and I could leave and go into another room and read.
My wife eventually forgave me.
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 01:26 AM
Great question!! Every so often a group of my friends get together for a 'Bad Movie Night' and thus far the reigning champion has to be "Death Bed: The Bed That Eats" - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0385639/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMkxVmLHIMk
Here is a slightly NSFW review of the movie as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3_KqAW_29w
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 01:41 AM
Gigli... I am embarassed to admit I ever saw it. So obvious their relationship wasn't going to work out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-7iv6-8BRw
It actually won six Razzies:
Worst actor
Worst Actress
Worst Screen Couple (Bennifer - the start of the word couple name trend)
Worst Director
Worst Screenplay
Source(s):
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,596113,00.html
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 02:05 AM
Megaforce. OMG this one was bad! Flying motorcycles outfitted with apparently recoilless rockets. Gold jumpsuits, the crotch of which get closeups. This damaged a group of us so badly that we became a local MST 3000, openly laughing at the rubbish movies put out around that time.
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 02:43 AM
From the director of SNATCH (cool, I loved that movie) Starring Madonna (well, she is a STAR)
The movie that gave them an excuse to go to Greece.
Swept away
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuJcTVfuGkA
Bad, boring and offensive.
I coulndn't even finish it.
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 03:03 AM
Bride Wars! I zoned out after five minutes. It fried my brain! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjsA0_arKtk
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 03:08 AM
To me, a truly horrible movie is not just awful, it makes you feel robbed for watching. I saw _Ransom_ for free and I still felt cheated. There are some movies that are just dumb, and the people who make them know they are dumb, and people watch them when they want a dumb movie. Fine. No harm, no foul. In fact, a really campy bad movie can be enjoyable.
But some movies are awful but miss the so-awful-it's-hilarious chance at redemption. These movies insult the intelligence of the audience, and bore the audience while simultaneously trying to evoke great pity for and admiration of its characters. So here are the main reason why _Ransom_ is the worst movie I have ever seen (and keep in mind that I saw the Dukes of Hazzard remake). Spoiler alert: if you like horrible movies and want to see this one, don't read below.
1) A bad movie lacks talented actors. A truly horrible movie wastes great talents on horrible characterizations and plots. Mel Gibson, Gary Sinise, Lili Taylor, and Rene Russo are the actors, Ron Howard the director. Huge waste of talent. I actually felt pity for these rich and famous people.
2) The whole plot is a ridiculously convoluted mess. An elaborate yet uninteresting plot involving crooked cops working with criminals to kidnap a rich guy's kid. Every twist that was supposed to be mind-bending was either predictable or heavy-handed. The climactic scene was the a-hole businessman (Gibson) being inexplicably hardass when he figured out who the kidnapper was. After the kidnapper came to his house to collect the award for finding the kidnapper. And the little boy wet himself. Because criminal masterminds are idiots. And by this scene you are so unengaged with the suspension of disbelief that you don't feel sorry for the traumatized child character. You do sort of feel sorry for the child actor who has to go back to school after playing this part, though.
3) Character motivations make no sense. Mel Gibson's character decides to make a series of moves that would in real life get his kid killed right away. These flat characters are a big part of why the plotline is so ludicrous.
4)Female characters are all useless idiots. Rene Russo is helpless; she has no say in the situation, and her husband doesn't even think about what she thinks is the right move in protecting her son. When she does go against his wishes it goes very badly, and the kidnapper even acts aggressively in a semi-sexualized way. In other words, the father who doesn't listen to the authorities is a badass, The mother who does the same is a fool who puts herself in danger.
5) The nuanced actor Gary Sinise plays a caricature not a character.
6) There was just enough suspense to make you feel unpleasant, but not enough to keep it compelling.
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 05:10 AM
I don't see a whole lot of movies - there just aren't many that pique my interest. I did see Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, though. Holy cow, where does one even begin with a movie like that? It's clear that they made it just to cash in on the genuinely good first movie. And they went at the script with only one thing in mind: "How do we fit as many characters from the game in as possible?"
The answer? "By having 90% of them do nothing of note." There were so many characters, most of who(m?) looked awful. Shao Khan was especially bad. His actor always looked like every line he spoke could potentially make him go to the bathroom in his pants. The story was nonexistent and the CGI was atrocious. I went in knowing nothing about it save that I had lots of fun with the first movie, which is actually the only video game movie I'd call any good at all. And I left ANGRY. I had wasted good money on that movie. I was mad at the writers for churning out such bad dialogue, the film makers for producing it, and myself for SEEING it.
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 01:06 PM
It's a tie betwen Very Bad Things and Erin Brocknovich. Very Bad Things had it all - bad acting, bad plot, gratuitous almost-nudity. It was one step up from a softcore porn you'd see on Cinemax. Except that it wasn't even *good* softcore porn. It was just horrible.
Erin Brocknovich is the only movie I can remember actually leaving the theatre in the middle. A movie about a woman who just keeps making ridiculously bad choices, of her own accord, that we're somehow supposed to consider the heroine. A friend and I went to see it. 30 minutes into the movie, as we were both trying to poke our eyes out, the Dirty Biker Dude moved in next door. We looked at each other, and agreed - if she ends up sleeping with him, which would make NO SENSE and be completely contradictory to everything she's claiming she wants to do and be another ridiculously bad hcoice, then we're walking out. 10 minutes later, we walked out.
Source(s):
personal opinion
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 03:40 PM
First, I don't think one should list movies that are clearly made with no expectation that they are "good".. i.e. B-movies to Z-movies as the "worst" -- often times they are MADE to be bad, fully made with the expectation that they are going to be horrible. So, when the expectation is low, they often live up to your expectation... So, if something was made with the expectation that they would be good.. and a lot of effort was put in... these are the ones that are most disappointing..
I'm surprised nobody has listed these yet...
Howard the Duck. A fairly decent comic book character, expected to be good based on the content of the comics. MILLIONS spent in production. $37-39 million dollars spent in 1986, which was a lot for a film at the time. according to http://www.filmsite.org/80sintro.html "the average film budget was over $18 million" So, if the average is just north of 18 millon.. one can see that it was a lot of money to spend on a film at the time. It basically killed the career of it's writing team and director, two people who had previously written American Graffiti and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom among others. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_the_Duck_(film)
Leonard Part 6 -- so bad it makes you wonder what happened to parts 1-5. So bad that Bill Cosby who wrote, produced and starred in the thing was panning the movie on tv and in interviews before it even came out! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Part_6
I will leave it up to everyone else to look up how many razzies and other bad reviews these films got. Let's just say, they didn't go.. unnoticed as bad.
Permalink | Report
March 25, 2009 12:05 AM
I just realized you can watch the entire thing (Howard the Duck) on Hulu!
http://www.hulu.com/watch/49587/howard-the-duck
Report
http://www.hulu.com/watch/49587/howard-the-duck
March 20, 2009 03:56 PM
There are a lot of bad movies out there, but one that sticks in my head and made me think, "Why in the hell was this movie made??!!", was You Don't Mess With The Zohan. OMG that movie sucked. I think sometimes Adam Sandler tries too hard to be funny, that it just comes across as being way too stupid. And I really like Adam Sandler, but this movie was horrible.
Permalink | Report
March 20, 2009 10:19 PM
I once saw a movie called Schultze Gets the Blues which was truly vexing. It was one of those movies on the new release wall that has only one box - usually not a good sign. The premise was that this traditional polka accordion player from rural Germany is depressed and gets an itch to travel to america to a Zydeco festival, based on having heard a Album of Zydeco music. The premise seemed interesting, but the movie was truly painful.
Source(s):
Two hours stolen from my soul.
Permalink | Report
March 21, 2009 01:08 AM
In recent memory, Night on Rodanthe starring Richard Gere and Diane Lane. They had zero chemistry and the story was lame. I want my time back! http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nights_in_rodanthe
Permalink | Report
March 22, 2009 05:40 AM
300. Words cannot express the mind-numbing awfulness of this movie. At times I thought I was watching a Chippendales show, at other times a really badly acted sofcore porno. They lifted scenes straight from Gladiator and Braveheart, for instance, the serene walking through wheat fields scenes. Gerard Butler's accent even changed from Scottish to Roman to god knows what. The musical scores that didn't suck were similarly lifted from other movies. If you pulled out just the coolest fight scenes and patched them together you could make an awesome 3-5 minute video clip, but as a feature length movie this was painfully embarrassing to watch.
300 dethroned Swordfish as the worst movie I've ever.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
2013 spin-off tv series planned to take place after the movie 2012 ends. Any thought...
Has Google Ever deactivated your account, claiming TOS violation?
Have you ever auditioned for Cirque du Soleil? What was it like?
I am about to build a business on someone's sitting domain name. Can anyone recommend...
Has Google Ever deactivated your account, claiming TOS violation?
Have you ever auditioned for Cirque du Soleil? What was it like?
I am about to build a business on someone's sitting domain name. Can anyone recommend...
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- holiday, November 12, 2009 11:16 PM
- mich22, November 12, 2009 11:16 PM
- starbucks12, November 12, 2009 11:08 PM
- joethefarmer, November 12, 2009 10:43 PM
- michellejanychr..., November 12, 2009 10:42 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More






