Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M$2.00 Funded By Mahalo ? |
April 20, 2009 01:19 AM
RSS
When a = 0
LHS = (x²⁺⁰ + y²⁺⁰)² = (x² + y²)²
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁺⁰ = (x² + y²)²
LHS = RHS
----------
When a > 0
Expand Left hand side (LHS) and Right hand side (RHS) and compare:
LHS = (x²⁺ᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)² = x²⁽²⁺ᴬ⁾ + 2x²⁺ᴬy²⁺ᴬ + y²⁽²⁺ᴬ⁾
LHS has 3 distinct terms
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2+a
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁺ᴬ = ∑ C(2+a,k) x²⁺ᴬ⁻ᴷ yᴷ, where C(2+a,k) = 2+a choose k
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .k=0
RHS has 2+a+1 = (3+a) distinct terms (3+a > 3, since a>1)
LHS ≠ RHS (since they have different number of distinct terms)
----------
For a < 0 → check a = -1, a = -2, a < -2
When a = -1
LHS = (x²⁻¹ + y²⁻¹)² = (x + y)² = x² + 2xy + y²
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁻¹ = x² + y²
LHS ≠ RHS
When a = -2
LHS = (x²⁻² + y²⁻²)² = (x⁰ + y⁰)² = (1+1)² = 4
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁻² = (x² + y²)⁰ = 1
LHS ≠ RHS
----------
When a < -2
In this case we get into negative exponents.
I haven't quite figured out how to prove this algebraically yet.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
How would I prove this one way or the other?
If a not = 0, then (x^(2+a)+y^(2+a))^2 not = (x^2+y^2)^(2+a)
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
- In Mathematics |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| April 20, 2009 04:43 AM |
LHS = (x²⁺⁰ + y²⁺⁰)² = (x² + y²)²
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁺⁰ = (x² + y²)²
LHS = RHS
----------
When a > 0
Expand Left hand side (LHS) and Right hand side (RHS) and compare:
LHS = (x²⁺ᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)² = x²⁽²⁺ᴬ⁾ + 2x²⁺ᴬy²⁺ᴬ + y²⁽²⁺ᴬ⁾
LHS has 3 distinct terms
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2+a
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁺ᴬ = ∑ C(2+a,k) x²⁺ᴬ⁻ᴷ yᴷ, where C(2+a,k) = 2+a choose k
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .k=0
RHS has 2+a+1 = (3+a) distinct terms (3+a > 3, since a>1)
LHS ≠ RHS (since they have different number of distinct terms)
----------
For a < 0 → check a = -1, a = -2, a < -2
When a = -1
LHS = (x²⁻¹ + y²⁻¹)² = (x + y)² = x² + 2xy + y²
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁻¹ = x² + y²
LHS ≠ RHS
When a = -2
LHS = (x²⁻² + y²⁻²)² = (x⁰ + y⁰)² = (1+1)² = 4
RHS = (x² + y²)²⁻² = (x² + y²)⁰ = 1
LHS ≠ RHS
----------
When a < -2
In this case we get into negative exponents.
I haven't quite figured out how to prove this algebraically yet.
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: bbrookin
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- unmemom, December 10, 2009 07:36 PM
- kh, December 10, 2009 07:35 PM
- mjax82405, December 10, 2009 07:35 PM
- thestitchwitch, December 10, 2009 07:33 PM
- ilcinhanegri, December 10, 2009 07:29 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
This isn't quite a proof yet, but it is a demonstration for certain special cases, which is certainly progress.
"LHS ≠ RHS (since they have different number of distinct terms)"
Is this true as a general statement? Maybe I'm not understanding what exactly you;re beinh asked to prove here.
If it's "There does not exist any x,y for which LHS(x,y) = RHS(x,y)" then showing there are different terms on LHS & RHS hasn't got you anywhere as far as I can see.
If it's "It is not true that for all x.y LHS(x,y) = RHS(x,y)" then you could prove that more easily by just demonstrating a counter-example.
I'm afraid I don't want to spend any more time on this than a quick skim, but that's what strikes me at a quick glance at the quesion and the proposed answer.
x²⁽²⁺ᴬ⁾ + x²⁺ᴬy²⁺ᴬ + x²⁺ᴬy²⁺ᴬ + y²⁽²⁺ᴬ⁾ = (x² + y²) (x² + y²)¹⁺ᴬ
x² (x²⁺ᴬ + xᴬy²⁺ᴬ) + y² (x²⁺ᴬyᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ) = x² (x² + y²)¹⁺ᴬ + y² (x² + y²)¹⁺ᴬ
(x²⁺ᴬ + xᴬy²⁺ᴬ) = (x² + y²)¹⁺ᴬ
(x²⁺ᴬyᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ) = (x² + y²)¹⁺ᴬ
(x²⁺ᴬ + xᴬy²⁺ᴬ) = (x²⁺ᴬyᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)
x²⁺ᴬ = x²⁺ᴬyᴬ
yᴬ = 1
y = 1 or a = 0
xᴬy²⁺ᴬ = y²⁺ᴬ
xᴬ = 1
x = 1 or a = 0
----------
Case 1: x=1,y≠1 or x≠1,y=1 or x≠1,y≠1 ⇒ a=0
Case 2: x=1,y=1
(x²⁺ᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)² = (x² + y²)²⁺ᴬ
(1²⁺ᴬ + 1²⁺ᴬ)² = (1² + 1²)²⁺ᴬ
4 = 2²⁺ᴬ ⇒ a=0
----------
Therefore (x²⁺ᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)² = (x² + y²)²⁺ᴬ ⇒ a=0
A→B ⇔ ¬B→¬A
You asked to prove:
If a ≠ 0, then (x²⁺ᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)² ≠ (x² + y²)²⁺ᴬ
This is equivalent to:
If ¬((x²⁺ᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)² ≠ (x² + y²)²⁺ᴬ), then¬(a ≠ 0) or
If (x²⁺ᴬ + y²⁺ᴬ)² = (x² + y²)²⁺ᴬ then a=0
which is the logic I used in my proof