Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M¢25 Funded By Mahalo ? |
July 08, 2009 02:53 AM
RSS
I took a journalism course while I was in college where they tried to teach us to say as much as possible using the least amount of words. In the drive throught society we live in today I believe people want to find out the answer and move onto the next thing.
I personally prefer the "right answer."
Not sure if it is a guy/girl thing, but I will turn this into one. LoL. I notice when I have conversations with my sister she insists in throwing in alot of details. I on the other hand will tell the same story but just highlight the main points and be done with it. Matter of taste I suppose.
Permalink | Report
pellrider
In my mind short and to the point answers are preferred rather than long answers.
Permalink | Report
But, if you would like to know, I prefer long answers. You might get unneeded information, but usually, with that extra information, you are ensured that none of the important information is left out.
In other situations, I would prefer a short answer. It all depends on my question.
Short answers are the best if you've got all you need in the answer. But, they can seem to be bad many times, as lots of detail is left out. shorter answers seem to be good in situations where the question isn't asking a lot, or is short and to the point.
A short answer seems to be good in a question like this:
What are the majority of soda cans made from?
The answer would be best if it was short, saying "Most soda cans are made from Aluminum." Any more detail, will just get you into the history of soda cans, or Aluminum, which is not needed to know what soda cans are made from.
A bad short answer could be in a Q like this:
If I'm wiring an amplifier to 4 speakers, how should I wire it?
The answer would be best if elaborated. An answer such as "Just take the wires, and hook them up to the amp" wouldn't suffice for such a question. The answer would also be easier if the Question is more descriptive. The person answering needs to know how many Ohms the amp is stable at, how many ohms the speakers voice coils are, and how many voice coils per speaker are there.
I prefer longer answers, as they seem to leave out the least amount of important details.
But I also prefer long, descriptive questions, as it helps lessen the amount of explaining, and further questions asked by the person trying to solve the question.
Helpful Answer?
(5)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Permalink | Report
If the answer needs a lot of words, probably there is a reference or a web page to which a short answer could point, avoiding plagiary or poor rewriting.
There are however circumstances in which the question itself is not precise enough, and where it might be helpful to deliver not only the concise answer to what you think to be the real question, but also some highlights on answers to some interpretations of the question.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
http://severaltips.blogspot.com
Permalink | Report
Simple "yes" or "no" answers without details or context aren't generally very good.
You should try to make questions asked from Twitter as short as you can so that they can be displayed best in Twitter's format (140 characters only)
It can be fun, and useful, to go into a bit more detail on certain questions, like fun questions ("what is your favorite...?") or opinion questions ("do you think...?"). However, there is such a thing as Too Much Information.
Also, sometimes you can take so long to answer a question, someone else answers it before you and a "Best Answer" is selected before you even finish your response!
I tend to go on a little more than I should, perhaps, but I try to balance being thorough, concise and fun.
I prefer answers that are thorough, fun, and easy to read. Since I read pretty fast and I like having Too Much Information, I tend to prefer longer answers.
Source(s):
Personal experience.
Permalink | Report
Writing should be concise and factual. Majority of readers on-line don't scroll down unless they are very intrigued with what they see above the fold.
Jakob Nielson's writing on web usability are considered among the best.
Be as concise as possible when answering questions from Twitter. A few statements and a couple of good links work well.
Source(s):
http://www.useit.com/eyetracking/
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
What is better a long answer or a short answer?
I was just thinking I always give short and to the point answers to questions. Some people write long drawn out answers to questions. Just wondering what people prefer?
- In Mahalo Answers Community |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| July 08, 2009 03:24 AM |
I personally prefer the "right answer."
Not sure if it is a guy/girl thing, but I will turn this into one. LoL. I notice when I have conversations with my sister she insists in throwing in alot of details. I on the other hand will tell the same story but just highlight the main points and be done with it. Matter of taste I suppose.
| Asker's Rating: |
Permalink | Report
pellrider
July 08, 2009 03:37 PM
It is a good answer. I will try to "say as much as using least amount of words". That is very nice of you to share this.
Tip pellrider for this comment
Report
Other Answers (18)
July 08, 2009 04:25 AM
It all depends on the question and what exactly are the contents .Technical question warrants to the point answers where as question on society , history , relation ship have generally long answer . In my mind short and to the point answers are preferred rather than long answers.
Permalink | Report
July 08, 2009 04:29 AM
It, to me, depends on what is in the answer, and what the question is asking. But, if you would like to know, I prefer long answers. You might get unneeded information, but usually, with that extra information, you are ensured that none of the important information is left out.
In other situations, I would prefer a short answer. It all depends on my question.
Short answers are the best if you've got all you need in the answer. But, they can seem to be bad many times, as lots of detail is left out. shorter answers seem to be good in situations where the question isn't asking a lot, or is short and to the point.
A short answer seems to be good in a question like this:
What are the majority of soda cans made from?
The answer would be best if it was short, saying "Most soda cans are made from Aluminum." Any more detail, will just get you into the history of soda cans, or Aluminum, which is not needed to know what soda cans are made from.
A bad short answer could be in a Q like this:
If I'm wiring an amplifier to 4 speakers, how should I wire it?
The answer would be best if elaborated. An answer such as "Just take the wires, and hook them up to the amp" wouldn't suffice for such a question. The answer would also be easier if the Question is more descriptive. The person answering needs to know how many Ohms the amp is stable at, how many ohms the speakers voice coils are, and how many voice coils per speaker are there.
I prefer longer answers, as they seem to leave out the least amount of important details.
But I also prefer long, descriptive questions, as it helps lessen the amount of explaining, and further questions asked by the person trying to solve the question.
Helpful Answer?
(5)
(0)
Helpful: badaspie, spoon, jeffhoard, beast1oh1, krysstel
Tip some_anchovies for this answer
July 08, 2009 05:57 AM
Agreed. There is no "best" answer length, and a simple-appearing question sometimes deserves a complex answer with extensive background information. I especially agree with your last paragraph; if the question is ambiguous or vague, a concise answer may be impossible.
Report
July 08, 2009 04:48 AM
In my opinion, it depends on the question. If the question is, what's the fastest car in the world? A short answer with a few extra facts is all that is needed. However if the question is, what's the best way to bring up children? The answer will most likely need to be quite long.
Permalink | Report
July 08, 2009 07:55 AM
If the answer can be delivered in a few words, it should. If the answer needs a lot of words, probably there is a reference or a web page to which a short answer could point, avoiding plagiary or poor rewriting.
There are however circumstances in which the question itself is not precise enough, and where it might be helpful to deliver not only the concise answer to what you think to be the real question, but also some highlights on answers to some interpretations of the question.
Permalink | Report
July 08, 2009 12:29 PM
I don't like to look at if the answer is long or short. I like to look to see if the answer is right and provides enough information. If a simple yes/no will do then that will be good enough for an answer, but it you need a small novel for an answer then that is what you should get.
Permalink | Report
July 08, 2009 02:45 PM
Short answer. If not appropriate answer.
Source(s):
http://severaltips.blogspot.com
Permalink | Report
July 08, 2009 03:19 PM
Questions are best when they are on the short side, but they must also thoroughly answer the question. Simple "yes" or "no" answers without details or context aren't generally very good.
You should try to make questions asked from Twitter as short as you can so that they can be displayed best in Twitter's format (140 characters only)
It can be fun, and useful, to go into a bit more detail on certain questions, like fun questions ("what is your favorite...?") or opinion questions ("do you think...?"). However, there is such a thing as Too Much Information.
Also, sometimes you can take so long to answer a question, someone else answers it before you and a "Best Answer" is selected before you even finish your response!
I tend to go on a little more than I should, perhaps, but I try to balance being thorough, concise and fun.
I prefer answers that are thorough, fun, and easy to read. Since I read pretty fast and I like having Too Much Information, I tend to prefer longer answers.
Source(s):
Personal experience.
Permalink | Report
July 10, 2009 08:38 PM
In general, writing for the Internet calls for inverted pyramid style. Put the meat in the first paragraph and use additional paragraphs to support the first. Writing should be concise and factual. Majority of readers on-line don't scroll down unless they are very intrigued with what they see above the fold.
Jakob Nielson's writing on web usability are considered among the best.
Be as concise as possible when answering questions from Twitter. A few statements and a couple of good links work well.
Source(s):
http://www.useit.com/eyetracking/
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- modelkurby, November 28, 2009 06:52 AM
- nickbarbarino, November 28, 2009 06:48 AM
- jemblung, November 28, 2009 06:48 AM
- chaitanyacivil, November 28, 2009 06:37 AM
- airexodaravla, November 28, 2009 06:36 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More