Next Question
RSS
No. Its a form of spam since you are linking users to an advertisement which has hijacked an actual source.
We've discussed this internally and concluded that it lowers the quality of the service Mahalo Answers provides. We'd appreciate that if you do see somebody using adjix links to report the answer so that we can replace the spam with the legitimate link.
Mahalo is already offering money for the highest quality answers, so by posting advertisements within your answer, we feel, is a form of spam and probably also a form of gaming.
Permalink | Report
http://www.mahalo.com/answers/from-twitter/what-do-you-think-of-adjix-super-annoying-or-brilliant
To directly answer your question:
Yes. I think that Mahalo Answer users should be allowed to use any URL shortening service that they would like. However, I can certainly see why links from Adjix and other ad supported short URL sites should be removed.
While the Adjix service could be considered a source of spam and it does not add any value to to the content it is encapsulating, the service displays ads gracefully and is easily turned off by either the linker, webmaster or end user (adblock plus).
Adjix is VERY new. Since there are a limited number of ways to monetize twitter and direct link traffic, we're going to see Adjix like services become more popular in the coming weeks.
Remember that online advertising is currently undergoing a revolution. Ad sales across every medium are down. This is causing anyone who relies on advertising for income to become infinitely more creative in both the development and distribution of ads.
So, while I don't like Adjix and wish that the spammy evil sob's would go away, I don't want the Internet to change too drastically and maintaining advertising revenue is important. If nothing else, Adjix is taking a unique approach to monetize otherwise hard to convert traffic.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$2
March 22, 2009 06:21 PM
Should we allow people to link their sources using Adjix?
I've seen some answers in which the sources are adjix links. I find this annoying because you don't know what the source is first hand and if you click on it you see ads. It's also pretty obvious that the person who links it is getting some kind of payout. And it's prone to making people click on malicious or unknown sites.
Is this practice ok? What do you guys think? If you use Adjix feel free to defend yourself.
Is this practice ok? What do you guys think? If you use Adjix feel free to defend yourself.
Interesting Question?
Yes (5)
No (0)
- In Mahalo Answers Community |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| March 22, 2009 06:33 PM |
We've discussed this internally and concluded that it lowers the quality of the service Mahalo Answers provides. We'd appreciate that if you do see somebody using adjix links to report the answer so that we can replace the spam with the legitimate link.
Mahalo is already offering money for the highest quality answers, so by posting advertisements within your answer, we feel, is a form of spam and probably also a form of gaming.
| Asker's Rating: |
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (1)
March 22, 2009 07:39 PM
The CEO of Adjix and I had a conversation about the service here: http://www.mahalo.com/answers/from-twitter/what-do-you-think-of-adjix-super-annoying-or-brilliant
To directly answer your question:
Yes. I think that Mahalo Answer users should be allowed to use any URL shortening service that they would like. However, I can certainly see why links from Adjix and other ad supported short URL sites should be removed.
While the Adjix service could be considered a source of spam and it does not add any value to to the content it is encapsulating, the service displays ads gracefully and is easily turned off by either the linker, webmaster or end user (adblock plus).
Adjix is VERY new. Since there are a limited number of ways to monetize twitter and direct link traffic, we're going to see Adjix like services become more popular in the coming weeks.
Remember that online advertising is currently undergoing a revolution. Ad sales across every medium are down. This is causing anyone who relies on advertising for income to become infinitely more creative in both the development and distribution of ads.
So, while I don't like Adjix and wish that the spammy evil sob's would go away, I don't want the Internet to change too drastically and maintaining advertising revenue is important. If nothing else, Adjix is taking a unique approach to monetize otherwise hard to convert traffic.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- swagatkajale, December 07, 2009 09:26 PM
- gold266, December 07, 2009 09:26 PM
- mauricebaker, December 07, 2009 09:24 PM
- marktrumors, December 07, 2009 09:17 PM
- fb_558954765, December 07, 2009 09:08 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
I think it's ANNOYING.
So for example, if I wanted to link you to a CBS article and wanted to make money off you clicking on that article, I would replace the CBS url with an adjix url, sure you'll still see the CBS content, but the URL will be replaced (hijacked) by the adjix url.
But adjix is the worst, hands down.
As long as it doesn't "hijack" the link when you visit it, I even use tiny url services when the link is absurdly long. Most TinyUrl services still re-direct the user to the actual URL, adjix however does not
It would be maybe 5 lines of code in a post-process function.
Thank goodness you guys have talked about this and are working to get rid of it. I have to think that it violates the "no affiliate URL's" section of the TOS in a round about sort of way.
I'm always hesitant to click on a shortened URL because I don't really know where it leads me. But I agree with @jeffhoard that ridiculously long links don't look nice and sometimes, they even break Mahalo's layout or look really ugly.
It would be possible to automatically post-process the URLs entered by users. Not only could Adjix (and similar ones) be filtered and replaced with the real URL, long URLs could be automatically shortened by Mahalo.
I like the way this is done e.g. in http://plurk.com : If a shared link is longer than a certain number of characters (and also if longer than 140 characters), it will be automatically shortened and ends with three dots ... But the shortening remains transparent to the user who still can see the first 20 or so characters and get an idea where the URL is located.
Mahalo could also automatically shorten URLs that are longer than one line.
Let's try out if this URL is breaking Mahalo's layout (sorry!) It links to the Mahalo Answers homepage:
http://www.hugeurl.com/?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
AdJix is a little over the top. If you see it, report it.