Next Question
RSS
They leapfrog each other in terms of speed, features, etc with every new release. They are both very good, and so is the free VirtualBox
http://www.virtualbox.org
I have always preferred VMWare Fusion because I install a lot of OSs, and the ability to download precanned "appliances" speeds up installation. VMWare virtual appliances can also be moved between platforms, it is not Mac only.
There are deals on both Parallels and Fusion at the moment. Parallels is part of the MacUpdate bundle - $49 with a lot of other good software.
http://www.mupromo.com
Fusion can be had from MacMall for $19.99 after a $10 rebate - version 1.1 with a free upgrade to version 2.
http://www.macmall.com/ttsvr/p/Software/product~dpno~7721087~pdp.fcddjfd
Helpful Answer?
(4)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
I switched to VMWare on my first dual-core laptop because parallels didn't support multicore vm's. Now, it looks like the latest Parallels version has better multicore support than VMWare Fusion. I also encountered a bug in VMWare Fusion with java applications in multicore vm's, which was fixed in a later release.
So, the technology evolves very rapidly and it's a moving target. If VMWare Fusion does everything you're looking for just stick with it. I wouldn't chase every little last bit of performance from release to release between the two.
Permalink | Report
http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.04/VMBenchmarks/index.html
The Parallels Desktop in general is faster. Please note, they both are competing neck to neck. It means, that at the next release, the slower product might up the game.
It also depends on what type of operating system is being virtualised.
The test was performed on the "White" MacBook (Late 2008), MacBook Pro (Unibody), iMac, and Mac Pro. The products used are VMware Fusion 2.0.1 and Parallels Desktop for Mac 4.0 (build 3540), running Mac OS X 10.5.5.
The test concluded:
-- quote --
In the majority of overall averages of our tests, Parallels Desktop is the clear winner running 14-20% faster than VMware Fusion. The one exception is for those that need to run Windows XP, 32-bit on 2 virtual processors, VMware Fusion runs about 10% faster than Parallels Desktop.
-- end quote--
Permalink | Report
This may address your issue:
http://kb.parallels.com/en/5036
I would also strongly recommend trying Sun's VirtualBox:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1
June 06, 2009 01:51 AM
VMware vs Parallels ?
I am a new MAC user ( one year )
I am using VMware to run my Windows software. I am evaluating the trial version of Parallels. I like the user interface much better and it is noticeably faster but I absolutely cannot get it to print.
VMware automatically connects the Windows machine to the MAC default printer. No configuration necessary.
Parallels indicates that it does the same thing but I cannot get it to print.
Any ideas about which is better, faster, best usser interface, etc.
I am using VMware to run my Windows software. I am evaluating the trial version of Parallels. I like the user interface much better and it is noticeably faster but I absolutely cannot get it to print.
VMware automatically connects the Windows machine to the MAC default printer. No configuration necessary.
Parallels indicates that it does the same thing but I cannot get it to print.
Any ideas about which is better, faster, best usser interface, etc.
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| June 06, 2009 02:07 AM |
http://www.virtualbox.org
I have always preferred VMWare Fusion because I install a lot of OSs, and the ability to download precanned "appliances" speeds up installation. VMWare virtual appliances can also be moved between platforms, it is not Mac only.
There are deals on both Parallels and Fusion at the moment. Parallels is part of the MacUpdate bundle - $49 with a lot of other good software.
http://www.mupromo.com
Fusion can be had from MacMall for $19.99 after a $10 rebate - version 1.1 with a free upgrade to version 2.
http://www.macmall.com/ttsvr/p/Software/product~dpno~7721087~pdp.fcddjfd
Helpful Answer?
(4)
(0)
Helpful: williamwaco, excellence24, rickg, soragon
Tip bdegrande for this answerVoted as best: williamwaco, lauriem
Other Answers (4)
June 06, 2009 03:41 PM
I've used both VMWare Fusion and Parallels over the years and I'd agree with bdegrande about them leapfrogging each other in terms of features. I switched to VMWare on my first dual-core laptop because parallels didn't support multicore vm's. Now, it looks like the latest Parallels version has better multicore support than VMWare Fusion. I also encountered a bug in VMWare Fusion with java applications in multicore vm's, which was fixed in a later release.
So, the technology evolves very rapidly and it's a moving target. If VMWare Fusion does everything you're looking for just stick with it. I wouldn't chase every little last bit of performance from release to release between the two.
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: bbrookin
June 08, 2009 06:49 AM
Check out this comparison test between Parallels Desktop and VMware Fusion. http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.04/VMBenchmarks/index.html
The Parallels Desktop in general is faster. Please note, they both are competing neck to neck. It means, that at the next release, the slower product might up the game.
It also depends on what type of operating system is being virtualised.
The test was performed on the "White" MacBook (Late 2008), MacBook Pro (Unibody), iMac, and Mac Pro. The products used are VMware Fusion 2.0.1 and Parallels Desktop for Mac 4.0 (build 3540), running Mac OS X 10.5.5.
The test concluded:
-- quote --
In the majority of overall averages of our tests, Parallels Desktop is the clear winner running 14-20% faster than VMware Fusion. The one exception is for those that need to run Windows XP, 32-bit on 2 virtual processors, VMware Fusion runs about 10% faster than Parallels Desktop.
-- end quote--
Permalink | Report
June 10, 2009 05:34 AM
Are Parallels tools installed in the Windows VM? This may address your issue:
http://kb.parallels.com/en/5036
I would also strongly recommend trying Sun's VirtualBox:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads
Permalink | Report
October 05, 2009 07:25 PM
Save Up to 79% on VMware Fusion 2 from #Amazon: List Price: $79.99Deal Price: $26.9 http://url4.eu/aeLs
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- jane89, December 08, 2009 07:17 PM
- johnkoch, December 08, 2009 07:16 PM
- heysusannah, December 08, 2009 07:16 PM
- aalona, December 08, 2009 07:15 PM
- yvesmiao, December 08, 2009 07:14 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More


