beast1oh1's Avatar
beast1oh1 4
91 Asked
340 Answered
110 Best
1
No one has voted on this question yet :(
2 years, 10 months ago

Is String Theory an actual theory or is it more of a hypothesis?

Tip for best answer: M$0.25
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

4 Answers

1
matthewh's Avatar
matthewh | 2 years, 10 months ago
0
String Theory is an anomaly. It has yet to be proven true, or false. It explains a lot and offers a lot of answers, but it disagrees with some of the principles/theories/laws we have already established. The way I see it: One of them is right and the other is wrong. One of them must be revised to fit a common standard.

Many are convinced that string theory is either missing things or just has to be rewritten. For this reason, there are tons of variations to string theory. So when you use the term "String Theory", you are actually being rather vague. Like I said, there are so many different versions that have yet to be proven or disproved.

The first step to really finding the correct answer is sorting out which ones are definitively wrong and which ones could be right. Once we narrow down the choices, it will be significantly easier to find the answer.

But this is easier said than done. To narrow down these choices at all, we will have to first have a better understanding of quantum mechanics and perhaps nature as a whole. The potential to eliminate the nonsensical from the sensible might be years away.

String theory is similar to the quantum theory of gravity (the 'Theory of Everything'). We will have to learn more before even attempting to solve the biggest questions in the universe. Or multiverse, as some convincingly suggest.

http://www.sflorg.com/sciencenews/images/imscn012307_02_01.gif

Some string theories require 11 dimensions, or more! But with every little flaw, and the inability to disprove it, we waste years of time and research. The first step is advancing technology to the point where we can adequately observe particles. This will lead to a better understanding of quantum mechanics. And with every new discovery comes a greater chance of solving the biggest mysteries humankind has yet to encounter.

FOR A COLLECTION OF GREAT VIDEOS EXPLAINING STRING THEORY FOR THE COMMON FOLK, follow the link. It is very informative.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/

Other informative websites include the following:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/9506/9506126v2.pdf
http://theory.tifr.res.in/~mukhi/Physics/string2.html
http://www.superstringtheory.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

Here is a very direct answer to your question. IT IS A HYPOTHETICAL THEORY.

"The line between theory and hypothesis can become blurry when it comes to very active and new areas of science. For instance, M-theory, an extension of string theory, is a body of knowledge that attempts to define how everything in the universe works, explaining quantum phenomena along with cosmological and everything in between. Unfortunately, M-theory is largely unproven. It makes a lot of sense (as far as descriptions of the quantum world make sense), but hasn't really been tested yet. M-theory can be more precisely be described as a hypothetical theory."
From,
http://physics.suite101.com/article.cfm/theory_vs__hypothesis_vs__law

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
morriss003's Avatar
morriss003 | 2 years, 10 months ago
10
It is both, but unlike many other scientific theories (such as evolution) there are as yet no predictions from it that, tested, can add to the data supporting the theory.

From;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

"Many detractors criticize string theory because it has not yet provided quantitative experimental predictions. Like any other quantum theory of gravity, it is widely believed that testing the theory directly by experiment would require prohibitively expensive feats of engineering. Whether there are stringent indirect tests of the theory is not yet known."

A good place to start studying string theory is here;

http://www.superstringtheory.com/

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
matthewh's Avatar
matthewh | 2 years, 10 months ago Report

These are very basic resources. And it cannot be both.

morriss003's Avatar
morriss003 | 2 years, 10 months ago Report

The reason that it is both is that there is disagreement in the scientific community as to whether the concept has enough validity to have passed from being a hypothesis (or an idea) to a theory (an idea that has a substantial body of evidence to support it).

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
doctordidi's Avatar
doctordidi | 1 year, 8 months ago
9
String Theory is more of a hypothesis than an actual theory because it is yet to be proved & I think at present it is discarded by most of the scientists.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
antonicum's Avatar
antonicum | 8 months, 2 weeks ago
0
String theory is a sorry waste of time: it will never solve anything as it is part of the problem.
It was set up to avoid point-interactions between particles which would lead to infinite interaction energies (like the electric force between two charged particles would become infinite at infinitesimal distances), to increase the ‘interaction-area’ to avoid such infinities.
The conceptual error of string theory (and physics at large) is the assumption that particles only are the source of their properties, the cause of their interactions, so any force between should be either attractive or repulsive.
However, if in a universe which creates itself, particles have to create one another, if they ultimately are as much the product as the source of their interactions, then so is the force between them, meaning that such infinities never arise in reality.
For more details see www.quantumgravity.nl.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates