andrew m's Avatar
andrew m 4
24 Asked
25 Answered
3 Best
1
No one has voted on this question yet :(
3 years, 1 month ago

Is it a violation of privacy for airports to use the new full-body x-ray scanners?

The ACLU thinks so, because the new machines can reveal medical conditions such as mastectomies and colostomies. Of course, there's also the issue that total strangers (security personnel) are basically seeing you naked!
Tip for best answer: M$4.00
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

12 Answers

0
dcanswerer's Avatar
dcanswerer | 3 years, 1 month ago
3
To directly answer your question, no I don't think this is a violation of privacy. TSA has put in place a number of controls to limit how much privacy a person loses.

First of all, you are in an airport boarding a plane. You have to give up a certain amount of privacy for this. We agree to show ID, to have our bags x-rayed or searched, walk through a metal detector, answer questions, etc. There is no way law enforcement can do this on the street without probable cause, but we understand that we must waive certain rights in order to board a plane. It's for the safety of everybody.

Second, unless you have a weapon on your person, this scan cannot be traced back to you. It's different from the x-ray machine that scans your bags. The TSA agent is sitting right there looking at that scan. But with this whole body scan, the person running the machine is in a different room with no windows. It is set up like that on purpose. They do it this way because they want to ensure that the person seeing your body on this scan cannot see you as a person. This ensures your privacy.

Third, the machine automatically blurs out faces, so even if the person looking at the screen were somehow able to print out the picture, leave the room, and go looking for you, there's no way to tell that the scan is you.

So basically, when you walk into the scanner, somebody in a windowless room away from the machine hits a button and sees a faceless image on his screen. If there's no weapon, the image is deleted after you leave the scanner, and there's no way to trace it back to you.

Personally, I'm happy this machine exists. It's far more effective than a metal detector at detecting weapons. As a frequent flier, I am glad to know there are no weapons on board.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
3
cinimod's Avatar
cinimod | 3 years, 1 month ago
3
Short answer no. Long answer, they do not require you to go through the system first of all. Second you can even see anything at all on the scanner that would deem inappropriate. Third if you have nothing to hide then you should have no problem. The people that have issues with this are either hiding something or are prudes that think that the outline of nudity no actual nudity is bad. The others are just people that like to cause problems and complain about everything. Which is what the ACLU is all about. Again though I state it is completely voluntary if you choose to not go through extra screening with someone touching you, you can opt to use the machine.

I have personally been through this machine twice and have no problems with it and have had up to 5 different tsa agents look at it at once. I work for an airline here in PHX sky harbor airport where they tested this machine.

I just think that people need to worry less about their privacy from strangers they will never see again that are there to help protect our skies and our family during flight and just enjoy their trip and remember that if you don't want to do it then request not to and they will do the old fashion pat down which too me is more invasive and private.
images:

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
makoman_brian's Avatar
makoman_brian | 3 years, 1 month ago
Well to be honest with you having a full body x-ray scanner used on you isn't entirely that bad, they have to scan so many people so quickly that oh well if they see a figure, at least you should know airports are being more secure on who rides on the airplanes.

Try being in the army and having to strip down in front of everyone to your boxers and t-shirt, every time you go through a security checkpoint at an airport...

I'm sure when you think about that idea, walking through a scanner isn't really that bad.

And honestly does this picture look that bad to you?
source(s):
Personal Experience
images:

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
viridicus's Avatar
viridicus | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

Honestly, yes, those pictures are dreadful. They reveal far more than anyone has the right to see.

albanian's Avatar
albanian | 3 years, 1 month ago Report

Those are bombs and guns viridicus!

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
sunpat's Avatar
sunpat | 3 years, 1 month ago
3
May be, but we need to pay the price for our safety.
Think, if the security personnel is your friend or a relative!
It is OK as long as they’re not saving it and putting it on the Internet!
images:

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
ensorceled's Avatar
ensorceled | 3 years, 1 month ago
3
Yes. However, you give up some of your privacy rights when you go through airport screening; that's why they can scan and search your luggage and scan your person for metal objects.

The real question is: Is this an undue violation of privacy.

Given that there have been no 9/11 events since 9/11; this seems a bit much.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
drscott15's Avatar
drscott15 | 3 years, 1 month ago
4
I don't know, but it could certainly reveal a lot of piercings. LOL

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
timw077's Avatar
timw077 | 3 years, 1 month ago
3
Considering that the food service workers, baggage handlers, TSA workers. and more don't go through the same security checks that everyone else has, a hijacker or terrorist won't be a passenger on the next attack, so this sort of check is meaningless, a waste of money, and a violation of your privacy.

Do you know the water you buy in the food court past security doesn't get checked at all? But your water bottle might be deadly, so leave it here please.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
bbrookin's Avatar
bbrookin | 3 years, 1 month ago
4
Yes, it's an invasion of privacy, defined as the "intrusion into into the personal life of another, without just cause." There is no need for this scan. I have not been patted down routinely in an airport up to this time, so this takes the place of nothing. I would opt for being patted down in the event that I failed the appearance/behavior screening, but would rather avoid travel through any airport that considers these procedures necessary.
I don't like being x-rayed, even with low doses. I especially don't like the idea of being x-rayed by a machine that is in a public place used by technicians with unknown training and whose maintenance records I'm not allowed to verify.There is no additional level of threat this device would stop, so it offers only the illusion of security.
We're also paying for this intrusion as part of the overall cost of airline transportation. Ultimately, I'm tired of being considered guilty until proven innocent and tired of financing every crackpot idea that comes along in the name of security.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
srgothard's Avatar
srgothard | 3 years, 1 month ago
4
I think it is unnecessary. 9/11 happened not because hijackers were not properly scanned, but because the hijackers did not bring illegal weapons (small knives and boxcutters were allowed), and people didn't try to defend themselves because they didn't conceive that the hijackers were going to die with them.

People today would be less likely to cooperate now that the possibility of a suicide hijacking has entered public consciousness. In my opinion, encouraging everyone to carry a boxcutter for protection would prevent another 9/11 better than full-body scans. You'll notice that massacres tend to happen in places where honest people are unarmed (airplanes, schools, churches). As hated as the police are, I don't hear of armed men going in and taking out hundreds of police, because police are armed.

We cannot guard against a criminal finding a way to sneak in a weapon, but they will be less successful if honest people can defend themselves and eventually less likely to try when it often fails. No one wants a fair fight. If they odds aren't for them, they won't try.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
jv88011's Avatar
jv88011 | 3 years, 1 month ago
3
give the current laws and politics (Patriot Act and 9/11), and even still i think that it would be allowed seeing as how your bags are xray when you go through security, and a closed bag has the same right of privacy that you as a person has.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
kodmastr's Avatar
kodmastr | 3 years, 1 month ago
0
that is a really disturbing way to look at it but yes they are basically seeing you naked. it's a horrible thought but it's true...plus you have to add on why they started doing full body scanning because of safety reasons...i mean i would rather let an officer see me naked then go on an unsafe airplane

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-1
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 3 years, 1 month ago
19
No it does not violate your privacy. If it were a mobile device that the police were carrying around to scan the public, that would be a completely different issue. But, when one voluntarily goes somewhere and a warning is posted about a search then one is subject to that search. This particular type of scanning seems a very efficient and non-invasive type of search.

There have been no drastic attacks on US airlines because security was increased. But it is surely an ongoing war of technologies like so many others. Right now there is no way to detect non-metal weapons, even guns. Fortunately those seem to be rare and experimental. But the sooner better scanners are in place the better.

It will, of course, have to be decided in the courts here in the US. In Europe the parliament and European Commission are arguing about it.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates