Is Ironman a cool flying terminator?
What similarities did you see between Iron man computer interface and terminators computer interface?
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$3 Answers
I don't think so, the Terminator was a machine covered by organic tissue. Its a complex computer that runs a machine. Ironman on the other hand is a human, who uses a machine/computer to enhance himself and his abilities. Both have the similarity of having tissue fused machine, but there is a human mind behind Ironman. One that is capable of rational thought and decision making based on the consequences of his actions. While the Terminator was a computer that can learn, it was largely ruled by its prime directive and not capable of alter its course.
I'm speaking strictly about the original Terminator form the 1984 film. The Terminators in the later films were reprogrammed to perform and respond to commands and their environment differently. They could be seen as having the ability to change their "mind" about what they were doing. I would say that the Terminators in the more recent films used their human companions as their conscience, and played off of that.
Me
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
The Terminator Interface was more of a system log (useful for Skynet after a ter a Terminator is destroyed, not for the Terminator itself). In fact I think you can see in the Terminator Display some of the same lines of output you'd see when booting Linux in terminal mode.
Tony Stark is cooler than Skynet, (he could probably figure out a way to neutralize Skynet if the two existed in the same continuum) but Skynet is much cooler than Jarvis, because Jarvis is not much more than an expert system.
A Terminator is marginally smarter than Jarvis because it needs to be autonomous to complete it's mission.
I've seen both movies and read comic books set in both universes.
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
M$
What do you think about the screen display in Jarvis verses the screen display in Terminator? Both systems had an object recognition system and text feedback.
Gesture technology and facial recognition are modern conveniences so to become available to the masses.
What functional with Blue brain provide onces it models neurons counts equal to the brain? Will the Blue brain model demonstrate that it is insufficient to compete with a real brain because the real brain is a partial quantum machine?
I think the text feedback and object recognition in the Terminator was largely there for the benefit of the audience. A robot would not need to read a display, it would directly interface with the HUD. How the information being presented is interpreted, is key to the decision making ability of a machine vs a human using a machine. I don't believe a Terminator would put much value on it other then, 'does what I'm seeing get me closer to my objective'. A human might see the same thing and react differently, possibly detouring from his goal, or changing his goal all together.
Great topic by the way!