mike's Avatar
mike 3
234 Asked
245 Answered
37 Best
-1
No one has voted on this question yet :(
3 years, 3 months ago

Is "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." a sentence? Can you diagram it?

Tip for best answer: M$1.00
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

6 Answers

5
michaelpaul's Avatar
michaelpaul | 3 years, 3 months ago
5
Yes, it is a sentence. According to Wikipedia, that sentence is used as an example of how homonyms and homophones can be used to create complicated constructs.

Buffalo, in addition to the animal and the city, also means “to bully, confuse, deceive, or intimidate.” As such, it can be parsed a few different ways:
  • Bison from Buffalo intimidate (other) bison from Buffalo that are intimidated by bison from Buffalo
Wikipedia goes on to say:

further understand the structure of the sentence, one can replace
"Buffalo buffalo" with any number of noun phrases. Rather than
referring to "Buffalo buffalo" intimidating other "Buffalo buffalo",
one can use noun phrases like "Alley cats", "Junkyard dogs", and "Sewer
rats". The sentence then reads, "Alley cats
Junkyard dogs intimidate happen to intimidate Sewer rats."]

images:

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
1
nadiraziz's Avatar
nadiraziz | 3 years, 3 months ago
4
Believe it or not, this sentence is grammatically correct and has meaning:
“Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.”

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_1niFwW2V8rA/R70n4RaGxAI/AAAAAAAAAGc/ipx-5FTbltc/s320/bison.jpg

First devised by professor William J. Rapaport in 1972, the sentence uses various meanings and parts of speech for the term “buffalo” (and its related proper noun “Buffalo”) to make an extremely hard-to-parse sentence.

Although most people know “buffalo” as both a singular and plural term for bison, and “Buffalo” as a city in New York, “buffalo” is also a verb meaning “to bully, confuse, deceive, or intimidate.” Using these definitions, Wikipedia suggests the sentence can be read:

Those (Buffalo buffalo) whom (Buffalo buffalo buffalo) buffalo (Buffalo buffalo).

Still too hard to follow for those of us who don’t know “buffalo” as a verb. Refine once more:

Those buffalo(es) from Buffalo are intimidated by buffalo(es) from Buffalo intimidate buffalo(es) from Buffalo.

And once more:

Bison from Buffalo, New York who are intimidated by other bison in their community also happen to intimidate other bison in their community.

The sentence is unpunctuated and uses three different readings of the word "buffalo". In order of their first use, these are

* c. the city of Buffalo, New York (or any other place named "Buffalo"), which is used as an adjective in the sentence and is followed by the animal;
* a. the animal buffalo, in the plural (equivalent to "buffaloes" or "buffalos"), in order to avoid articles (a noun);
* v. the verb "buffalo" meaning to bully, confuse, deceive, or intimidate.

Wikipedia has further explanation, including the slightly frightening note:

Buffalo is not the only word in English for which this kind of sentence can be constructed; any word which is both a plural noun and a plural form of a transitive verb will do. Other examples include dice, fish, right and smelt.

Beware of Buffalo buffalo, buffalo, for they may buffalo you!

http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/BuffaloBuffalo/buffalobuffalo.html
images:

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
gwenhwyfar's Avatar
gwenhwyfar | 3 years, 3 months ago
7
They said enough I think on the Buffalo & buffalo...what I can read here is an "ART of languages and comprehension". Just like saying in Latin Mnemonics "Malo malo malo malo" not Mahalo though...hmmm maybe let's come up with something Mahalo halo instead?

Malo: I would rather be

Malo: In an apple tree

Malo: Than a naughty boy

Malo: In adversity

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
pensivefox's Avatar
pensivefox | 3 years, 3 months ago
3
I have to say that this isn't anything more than a hypothetical justification on behalf of an English community, who will accept a novel riddle when fed to them as an official "truth" of grammatical establishment. The "code" Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo might be grammatically correct, but it's not a sentence. No, this kind of thing is an arbitrary dose of twisted rubbish. An authority who dictated a symbol of a relevant authority, inspired by an authority of grammar. This man: William Rapaport is, or was, undoubtedly, an honored man of language. If he wasn't already, he should have been working for the CIA in special communication coding; the undercover bureau of special investigative junkies: "deep cover." Without the proper prepositions or at least one coma, I only support Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo. It does work for six, that I know. However, 8 strung together, let alone seven, breaks the fundamental rules of syntax. THAT, is why it isn't acceptable. But then again, I'm not the president of Wikipedia. The grammar authority god. The master of "loopholes."
source(s):
My unorthodox mind.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
wilduncfan's Avatar
wilduncfan | 2 years ago
2
Yes, this is 100% a gramatically correct sentence. The reason this is true is because it uses center embedding. These types of sentences are not common and are rarely used. An example is "The man the girl saw went home after work". The man the girl saw is the subject of the phrase, and so the "saw" in the sentence isn't the main verb, with man being the "true" subject and "the girl saw" as describing him. Another way of writing the sentence above is "The girl saw a man who went home after work". Using the rule that subjects in plural form don't require articles in front of them, another sentence can be written. "Cats dogs chase like milk". This is a bit harder to comprehend than the first sentence. However, it's a true sentence. The "true" subject is cats, with "dogs chase" as being a description of these cats. The main verb of the sentence is "like", and "the milk" as the direct object. Now using the same breakdown, a breakdown of "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" can be accomplished. The first use of the uppercase"Buffalo" of the sentence is describing the noun, buffalo, which is directly followed by Buffalo the city three times in the sentence. The first "Buffalo buffalo" phrase is the "true" subject of the phrase, with the phrase directly following it, "Buffalo buffalo buffalo", as the description of the first "Buffalo buffalo" in the sentence. After wrapping your mind on this, the second half of the sentence can be deciphered. After seeing that "Buffalo (city) buffalo(noun) Buffalo(city) buffalo (noun) buffalo (verb)" is the full subject of the sentence, the main verb and direct object are left. The "buffalo" (verb) immediately after the first buffalo (verb) is the main action of the sentence. All that's left, the final "Buffalo buffalo" of the sentence, which are the last two words, is the direct object, which is the receiver of the first "Buffalo buffalo" buffalo-ing. This phrase, is comprised of Buffalo(city), which is followed by buffalo (noun). Now, combining all the segments yield the full sentence "Buffalo(city) buffalo (noun) Buffalo (city) buffalo (noun) buffalo (verb) buffalo (verb) Buffalo (city) buffalo (noun). If you are able to understand the sentence now, then good work, because it's a very complicated sentence. While yes it's a true, gramatically-correct sentence, it is pointless and is almost impossible to work into an everyday conversation.
source(s):
Various sources around the web

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-2
darcy logan's Avatar
darcy logan | 3 years, 3 months ago
0
No, it is not a sentence.

A sentence can be defined as: "a string of words satisfying the grammatical rules of a language."

The rules of grammar are rules designed to help people understand each other. It is also defined as "acceptable patterns of a language."

That string of words does not do either of these things. In order to do that, it would need a few prepositions and pronouns. For example: "Those Buffalo buffalo whom Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo other Buffalo buffalo.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
darcy logan's Avatar
darcy logan | 3 years, 3 months ago Report

@mike Not quite. I mean to say that a sentence cannot be grammatically correct if it is not easily understood. That is the purpose of grammar--understanding. As it does not satisfy the rules of grammar, it is not a sentence.

On another note, I have no idea why 3 people chose my answer not helpful.

robbrown's Avatar
robbrown | 3 years, 3 months ago Report

I've been down this road before.

It ends like this:

Buffalo sentence is grammatically correct. However, it's a loophole in the rules. A complete and properly formed sentence always conveys something. Without modifiers or punctuation, Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo is a string of words, not a sentence.

mike's Avatar
mike | 3 years, 3 months ago Report

do you mean to say that if it meets the requirement of being easily understandable then it is grammatically correct? The word "acceptable" carries a lot of weight, who is doing the accepting?

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates