baronzee's Avatar
baronzee 0
66 Asked
16 Answered
3 Best
3
No one has voted on this question yet :(
3 years, 4 months ago

Is a hard drive's reliability affected by the amount of data stored on it?

Tip for best answer: M$0.00
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

4 Answers

0
alfy's Avatar
alfy | 3 years, 4 months ago
4
The amount of data does not affect the reliability, the most important factor is the amount of hours you use it.
The lifespan of hard drives is measured in working hours, if you keep it always on it will wear off faster.

As it has been already said a very fragmented drive will perform poorly because of the need of physically move the heads all over the platter surface to locate scattered data, but bare in mind that the defragmentation process will also have a wearing effect, do it too often and it will be counter-effective.

You should also consider that the fragmentation issue is not a problem on linux machines as it is on windows.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
3
darth continent's Avatar
darth continent | 3 years, 4 months ago
4
It can be, in a way. If you never defragment the drive and pack it almost completely full of files, eventually it may get so fragmented that the drive is having to work harder, the heads scrambling all over the platters to gather up bits and pieces of files scattered all over the place.

This could eventually hasten the drive's failure, so it's a good idea to set up a regular defrag schedule on a very full drive I think.
source(s):
Years of experience installing, troubleshooting and disassembling hard drives in PCs.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
fjpoblam's Avatar
fjpoblam | 3 years, 4 months ago Report

Ditto that, simple logic. Piece of machinery: the more the arm has to move, the faster it'll wear out. Keep them files de-fragmented! Plus, stoopid me, on my very old IBM desktop (no longer with me, RIP) I let it get so full there wasn't even enough space left to LET me defrag it. And when I pulled out the hard drive to play Captain Destructo (per safe paranoid protocol) I could even see the tiniest hint of irregularity in the normally mirror-smooth surface.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
1
johnson90512's Avatar
johnson90512 | 3 years, 4 months ago
4
Not so much the amount of data that is stored on it, but really the amount of use that you give the drive. You could have at one time put several Gigs of data on this drive, but if you have erased it all it is still used, and therefore the reliability may go down.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
johnsonaaron's Avatar
johnsonaaron | 3 years, 4 months ago
5
A hard drive is a mechanical device. Your question is a bit more complicated, but could be compared to "Is a car engine less reliable the more miles it has on it?"

Short answer: Yes.

Long answer:
Because a hard drive is a physical device, it has a given failure rate. That failure rate says that a certain percentage of the drives will be defective from the manufacturer, and some will work 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 2 years, whatever. It's not as simple as an expiration date, but some devices will "naturally fail" HOWEVER the more use a drive gets, the more likely a failure is to occur. A never used drive has a 0% chance of failure, 0 use but 0% failure. The more you use it, the more likely a failure.
It is a logical step to assume that more data on a drive equals more use, more use equals greater failure rate. This is not to say that you couldn't write the data to the disc once, and then not access it anymore and then wouldn't be really using it much more so the failure rate could decrease.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
baronzee's Avatar
baronzee | 3 years, 4 months ago Report

Thank you for all the answers. Wear and tear through usage rather than data density seems the order of the day.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates