answered question
0
Votes
Votes
4
Answers
Answers
M$1.00
What's your opinion on the new iPod shuffle?
http://www.macworld.com/article/139325/2009/03/shuffle.html
My opinion: They made a bad product worse.
Now, at least it's 4GB, but the buttons are so small (and located on the cord) that it's impossible to use. At least it actually tells you (in a synthy VoiceOver voice) what song is playing...
Also, you now have to use the crappy Apple earbuds or get an adapter - hardly what most people had in mind when they thought of a compact MP3 player.
EDIT: It gets worse. Now, I found out how you actually control the thing:
The two squeezable ends of the remote are the volume controls.
Click the center button once to pause or unpause, twice to skip to the next track, three times to go back to the previous track.
Hold the button for a little bit to hear the name of the current song.
Hold it until you hear a beep to hear the names of all your playlists; press the button again once you hear the one you want to listen to.
Seriously, were these guys on crack? Six functions, all assigned simultaneously to the same button.
My opinion: They made a bad product worse.
Now, at least it's 4GB, but the buttons are so small (and located on the cord) that it's impossible to use. At least it actually tells you (in a synthy VoiceOver voice) what song is playing...
Also, you now have to use the crappy Apple earbuds or get an adapter - hardly what most people had in mind when they thought of a compact MP3 player.
EDIT: It gets worse. Now, I found out how you actually control the thing:
The two squeezable ends of the remote are the volume controls.
Click the center button once to pause or unpause, twice to skip to the next track, three times to go back to the previous track.
Hold the button for a little bit to hear the name of the current song.
Hold it until you hear a beep to hear the names of all your playlists; press the button again once you hear the one you want to listen to.
Seriously, were these guys on crack? Six functions, all assigned simultaneously to the same button.
|
Report
answers (4)
Aside from the interface problems, I cannot look at this ipod without snickering. I keep remembering the SNL skit from a few years ago with a fake Jobs and the ipod invisa.
source(s):
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/4656101/12447278
http://www.macsimumnews.com/index.php/archive/steve_jobs_ipod_spoofed_on_sn...
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/4656101/12447278
http://www.macsimumnews.com/index.php/archive/steve_jobs_ipod_spoofed_on_sn...
| Asker's rating: |
I understand that Apple is trying to make iPod Shuffle as simple device. However, this becomes too simple. It is supposed to be an entry level device too but the price is no longer an entry level device in the market.
4GB iPod Shuffle is $79. For the similar price ($79.95), you can get Sony 4GB walkman - with a screen.
Other points - you can't use your own headphones.
4GB iPod Shuffle is $79. For the similar price ($79.95), you can get Sony 4GB walkman - with a screen.
Other points - you can't use your own headphones.
You can use your headphones, but you need an adapter, which they haven't announced yet.
It is very small with lots of capacity. But You better keep up with the headphones. All the controls are located on a button on the headphones themselves.
Although I'm disappointed that the battery life has been reduced to 10 hours of playtime I am happy with the upgrade. Apple has a full lineup of mp3 players and this is just one of them that caters to a specific need. When I think of the shuffle I think of people using it while skiing or running where looking at the screen is either impractical, dangerous, or both. With the old shuffle a skier had to take the shuffle out of their pocket to jump to the next song and now they don't. This seems like an improvement to me.
The device is tiny, rugged, and moving the controls to the headphones makes sense for many of the people that use the device. Obviously there are people unhappy about this, but many of them hated the shuffle from day one and it has clearly done well.
As for requiring the Apple headphones there is one main issue. You can't use better headphones without an adapter. Personally I think if you are looking to use better quality headphones you wouldn't be using an ipod shuffle. If you are looking to use sport style headphones or something similar then I agree that it is a nuisance to need an adapter.
The device is tiny, rugged, and moving the controls to the headphones makes sense for many of the people that use the device. Obviously there are people unhappy about this, but many of them hated the shuffle from day one and it has clearly done well.
As for requiring the Apple headphones there is one main issue. You can't use better headphones without an adapter. Personally I think if you are looking to use better quality headphones you wouldn't be using an ipod shuffle. If you are looking to use sport style headphones or something similar then I agree that it is a nuisance to need an adapter.
Related questions
140 characters left
ask any question
