troutshoe's Avatar
troutshoe 2
28 Asked
0 Answered
2 Best
0
No one has voted on this question yet :(
2 years, 3 months ago via

If it was proven that President Obama was born in Africa and not the USA ,would you want him removed ASAP?

How would this be done? Would we need a trial? Who would read him his Miranda Rights? Would you want to chance it if it ment Biden would become president?
Tip for best answer: M$1.00
Separate topics with commas, or by pressing return. Use the delete or backspace key to edit or remove existing topics.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

What is Your Answer?

0
0
0

11 Answers

6
marisaupa's Avatar
marisaupa | 2 years, 3 months ago
3
Ironically, if Obama had lost and McCain would have won the election, we would still have "birthers", although probably from the other side of the political spectrum, claiming that McCain does not meet the requirements for natural born citizenship.

McCain was born in Panama in 1936, a year before Congress passed a law that grants natural born citizenship status to all born in the Canal Zone retroactive to 1904. The fact that the word retroactive is in the law would seem to make it a non issue, but this idea was actually kicked around by some that disfavored a McCain candidacy early on.

As far as Obama is concerned, he was born in Hawaii in 1961, making him a natural born citizen the second that he emerged from his mother's womb. Now, if by some bizarre form of family intrigue he was not, then the way the law was set at the time, even though his mother was an American, he would not be considered a natural born citizen, What then? A political, constitutional and governmental nightmare would ensue. If that were ever to be proven judicially, while he is in office or even after leaving office, that should render any executive order or bill signed into law by him null and void.

The mechanism for this to happen would require proving it before a judicial body and navigating it through all of the appeals, probably up to the Supreme Court. I imagine the issue would be statutory, meaning it would merely affirm or negate the assertion. If affirmed he would simply seize all presidential functions effective as of that moment, if he were still in office at that time. As far as culpability, intent, prior knowledge, etc, all that which constitute criminality of the action, that would have to be ironed out in other proceedings.

I feel reasonably sure that his citizenship status is what he claims, but if it were not, regardless of the firestorm unleashed from such a Pandora's box, it would have to be opened and the resulting mess cleaned up.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
sixpack's Avatar
sixpack | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

I've always thought it strange that Americans would automatically dismiss someone because they are not American. If they spent their first six months in another country and lived in America for the next 40/45 years they are not considered American. Yet some fool could be born in Texas and spend half his life partying around Europe and not be elected. It's a ridiculous requirement. Voters will pick the best candidate anyway.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
3
bjshively's Avatar
bjshively | 2 years, 3 months ago
3
Most "birthers" (people that make an issue of Obama's supposedly falsified place of birth) don't understand the rules and laws for US citizenship. Regardless of his father's heritage, and even where he was born, a US citizen doesn't have to be born in the continental United States. No one has ever contested whether or not his mother is a US citizen, and the US Citizenship and Immigration Services page clearly states that "Most people become U.S. citizens by: Birth, either within the territory of the United States or to U.S. citizen parents..."

The second part is the key here. Birth to U.S. citizen parents. Regardless of WHERE the birth occurs.

For example, if your mother was pregnant with you and took a vacation trip to Europe, and while there she went into labor, you would not be a French / Italian / whatever citizen. You can be born out of the country and still be a US citizen.

All that being said, this is a strawman issue and is, in my opinion, the lowest level of mudslinging. With the thoroughness of the vetting process that takes place with candidates, do people honestly think something of this nature would be overlooked? To answer your question, NO.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
gno's Avatar
gno | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Tetigustas - There's no evidence at all that he WAS birthed outside of the U.S. In fact, there's no honest-to-goodness reason to even suspect he's lying--only wishful thinking by his political opponents.

So in this case a truth teller is still a truth teller...

dsaldridge's Avatar
dsaldridge | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Do you really believe that no other politician has ever lied? What if he's not lying? Will calling him a liar for four years do anything to move this country forward? Will it make you feel better? If it does, then you need to examine your own motives and prejudices.

heatherfl's Avatar
heatherfl | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Excellent response dsaldridge. You read my mind.

tetigustas_shadowson's Avatar
tetigustas_shadowson | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

if he was birthed outside of the US by a citizen of the US, then why didn’t he just say so, why did he have to go through all the trouble to try and falsify his birth status...?

A liar is still a liar………..

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
1
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 2 years, 3 months ago
19
The actual meaning of "natural born citizen" has never been decided in the courts. If it were really shown that President Obama was not a "natural born citizen", perhaps because of being born outside the 13 original states or some such, and the Supreme Court reached that conclusion; then, he would be prevented from performing his duties just as if he were ill.

Vice President Biden would be the acting President until President Obama was able to resume his duties. In order for that to happen, either the Supreme Court would have to reverse its decision or else a constitutional amendment would have to be passed and ratified eliminating the "natural born citizen" clause or redefining it to fit. This is long overdue, but only a crisis would ever get the amendment through Congress and enough state legislatures.

There is no question of a trial and no question of an arrest as no law would have been broken. Anyone can be elected President, but such a person can not serve as President. If such a person is elected they remain as President but the Vice President serves until they are enabled to serve.

Some right wing fanatics live in a strange and unpleasant fantasy world. Even if President Obama were not eligible to serve as President he was still elected and would remain President. Of course, he is eligible to serve as he is a citizen and was born in Hawaii. But if Arnold Schwartznegger were to run and be elected, he would be in the position of an elected President that the Supreme Court would probably rule could not serve. His Vice President would act as President until the Constitutional amendment was rushed though - which would happen to avoid a Constitutional crisis.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
maggieray's Avatar
maggieray | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Re your comments to others, the questions says "would you want him removed". It doesn't what is your interpretation of the law.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
quesera's Avatar
quesera | 2 years, 3 months ago
3
And if it turned out he was actually a robot controlled by aliens, I would want him removed. But, neither are true, so we can think about more important things!

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
dtvrivera's Avatar
dtvrivera | 2 years, 3 months ago
6
I would not want him removed, even though I can see how it would go against the basic requirements for becoming president (being a naturally born citizen). Personally, I like what President Obama represents as a figure of power and a person of color having been elected to represent the United States. It took over 200 years for a person of racial minority background to live out the ultimate American dream, allowing millions of young children not only across the United States, but across the globe, to retain hope and to continue to dream, believing that they can one day become whoever it is they aspire becoming and do pretty much what they set their minds to. Having a President of African American background in office has opened the doors for future presidential candidates of diverse ethnic backgrounds to follow the lead and bring a fresh new perspective to the US government and the US people.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

The question is about the law.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
tetigustas_shadowson's Avatar
tetigustas_shadowson | 2 years, 3 months ago
5
YES!

once it was proved he misled the American people, it is the same as falsifying his birth certificate, its a forgery of his eligibility, if it was proven the Queen of England wasn’t rightfully the Queen would you want her removed ASAP!
It’s the same he hasn’t proved he is an American citizen by birth, he is still lying his rear-end off and misleading the world.
Because of the behaviours of previous presidents, the position has become a laughing stock, we need to be more proactive when it comes to holding politicians responsible for their actions.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Misleading people is not reason to be removed from office. Otherwise most politicians would be removed. As it happens, he is a natural born citizen and has proven it. It is the birthers who are a laughing stock world wide.

tetigustas_shadowson's Avatar
tetigustas_shadowson | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

president Obama has supplied a falsified birth record, it is obviously photo-shopped, so isn’t that a forgery and a disqualification of his eligibility. My answer isn’t a virulent animosity towards President Obama, he has intentionally mislead the people, I don’t blindly follow, I will keep my open mind to all probabilities, he is currently the president (currently) the commander and chief. I want proof of your intentions if you so choose to run for my presidential position its not just a beauty contest!

albanian's Avatar
albanian | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

The details of the question make clear that the question is about the legal consequences of a President who does not fulfill the constitutional requirements. This answer has no bearing on the question and is merely virulent animosity towards President Obama.

unwirklich's Avatar
unwirklich | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

I'd like to remind responders to this question that the "uninteresting" button is not supposed to be used to express disagreeing with an answer or question. Uninteresting should be used if say, the answer doesn't answer the question at all.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
0
hawkeyepierce's Avatar
hawkeyepierce | 2 years, 3 months ago
2
No, I don't think you should have to be born in the country to become a leader of it. Just because someone is from another country doesn't mean they should be removed from their position, I think that as long as they have the skills to be a good leader, make good decisions, and carry out good actions, that they should be fine. I don't live in the USA, so I am not familiar with the rules about this, but no, I would not want him removed for a shallow reason like that.
source(s):
My thoughts

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
tracebooks's Avatar
tracebooks | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Just so you know, it is law in the U.S. that you must be born here to be President. You can have all kinds of other offices but that one if you're born elsewhere and then become a citizen here.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-1
ai-ai's Avatar
ai-ai | 2 years, 3 months ago
15
Why did the Americans and the government had permitted him to become a senator then and then to president? It's no use removing him anymore. He has proven it already that he is an American. It's just a waste of time and money. And do you think that Biden will be better if he will replace Obama? Hmmm... I doubt it. No one can please everyone so as people who create the government, why did you want Obama seated in the first place and then want him be removed afterwards? Please explain this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VUwmZjVU1s&feature=fvsr
It's the people that create the government. Anyone who qualifies to run as president esp. in America, I assume, has been properly investigated (In this case, does it mean that the US system in knowing its citizens has weakened?). Then why now? What took these birthers so long to reveal that Obama isn't qualified to become a president?

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
tracebooks's Avatar
tracebooks | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

The "birthers" have been talking about this since before he was elected, and even have had a case get as far as federal court. The case would have been dismissed as frivolous by a lower court had there been nothing at all to it. Apparently at least one higher judge thought the case had enough merit to hear it.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-1
potterarchy's Avatar
potterarchy | 2 years, 3 months ago
4
If it was proven that Obama was an African citizen and not an American citizen, then it would be a legal issue that I would leave to Congress or whoever to decide. But if my opinion could be taken seriously, then no - I don't care. Africans have just as much class, power, culture, history, skills and intelligence as Americans do - to deny someone the presidency simply because he is not full-blooded American would be racist to the extreme. It's not like Obama would suddenly sympathize with different countries and pay attention to different issues because of his "African background" - no, he would do what is best for his country, as he advertised during his campaign.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

The question is about the law.

bklynj's Avatar
bklynj | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Please remember the reason for the President to be natural born is that he would have the best interest of the USA at heart. So that he would not sympathize with other nations or compromise against the best interest of America.

potterarchy's Avatar
potterarchy | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Apologies, @albanian, I didn't read the rest of the question. Thank you for your input, @dsaldrige and @bklynj, I suppose when you look at it that way it would make sense. I still wouldn't reject Obama if he were proven African - he grew up mainly in the US, he will sympathize with his home country. Conversely, I spent a lot of my formative years living in European countries, and I'm still American at heart. It depends on how you're raised.

dsaldridge's Avatar
dsaldridge | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Racist? How is it racist? Nationalist, maybe, but not racist. We wouldn't let Henry Kissinger run for President, and he was brilliant, and served our country for most of his life. He just wasn't a natural born citizen, and that's the law.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-1
kareul's Avatar
kareul | 2 years, 3 months ago
10
No I don't care where he was born. Where a man was born does not define a man. what defines a man is his character , what he does for his country, how many jobs he provides for people,how many families pensions he is able to save, how many foreclosures he prevents from happening and providing free health care for everyone. He could be born in a cave, at the bottom of the sea or somewhere on Mars it does not matter to me.
I know when I am hungry I want someone to feed me .He does not have to be an American. I just want to be fed and right now I am starving for prosperity.
images:

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Nobody asked whether you care, the question was about the law.

tracebooks's Avatar
tracebooks | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Whether a man follows the law is a good judgment of character, in my opinion. A President on his own would have to seize power he does not have in order to be responsible for free healthcare, or enacting any law without it going through the normal Congressional vote. If he seizes power and leaves Congress behind, then he would be a dictator.

Thousands of people died over 200 years ago so we could be one of the first countries ruled by law instead of the whims of a monarch or tyrant. To protect future generations from ever having to live through the horrors of a tyrant. No matter how charismatic a person is, you can't get blinded by it and throw away freedom for false prosperity. "Freedom" doesn't mean getting something for free, especially if that something first had to be taken away from my neighbor via compulsory taxes.

gno's Avatar
gno | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Actually, albanian, I think this question did very much ask about opinion...at least the first part of the question did. Would you *want* him removed immediately? I think the answerer did a nice job answering with an opinion.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel
-1
bklynj's Avatar
bklynj | 2 years, 3 months ago
3
He could have been born on the moon he is still a US citizen by birthright. Any law enforcement agency can read any citizen Miranda, it would go by local, state or federal jurisdiction. I don't like the idea of Biden as VP, Obama has had to cut him off before.

You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.

M$
albanian's Avatar
albanian | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

The Constitution requires a "natural born citizen" to perform the office of President. This has be interpreted (although not all the way to the Supreme Court) as having been born in the United States. This is a different issue than citizenship.

bklynj's Avatar
bklynj | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

A child who is born overseas because his parents were in the military is still eligible to be President.

bklynj's Avatar
bklynj | 2 years, 3 months ago Report

Natural born is at this point considered to be born of US parents as citizenship is considered those who come from other countries and get naturalized for the sake ogf this argument.

Report Abuse

Post Reply Cancel

Learn something new with our FREE educational apps!

Private lessons in the comfort of your own home. Get back in shape or finally pick up a guitar with our great experts guiding you the whole way!
Learn Guitar
Learn Hip Hop
Learn Pilates