Next Question
RSS
Hmm... well... I know some who will say it's because there's more Russian's in the league, but others are saying it's because they're being encouraged by "management" to mess it up a bit more in order to boost viewer ratings.
The way to tell if it's induced by management will be if you see a statistically different quantity and quality of violence happening during playoffs compared to ordinary season play.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
Observation.
Tags: goons, nhl, ufc, pummelling, danger
Helpful Answer?
(1)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
What I see during games is a majority of rough hits occurring when a team is losing. When players are down, they seem rather... frustrated, thus becoming aggressive and intimidating. Players are passionate about getting that win. Can the NHL change the nature of a game when teams are losing? Probably not. They can (and should), however, increase the severity of consequences for ugly game play, such as longer suspensions. I believe NHL general managers are already looking for a way to decrease hits to the head during games, which is a good step. Many of the hits in hockey (that lead to concussions) are considered legal and within rules, though. It will be interesting to see what their solution is.
I found a really great article in regards to the issues currently in hockey. It is in regards to the Buffalo Sabres' goaltender, Ryan Miller, who stated that the nature of the game has changed because a lot of the players have lost respect for the game and other players. The lack of respect is especially there when a player is vulnerable and not in possession of the puck.
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/sabres/story/859746.html
Source(s):
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/sabres/story/859746.html
Permalink | Report
http://www.nhlhockeybetting.com/2009/11/is-hockey-too-fast-now/
Source(s):
http://www.nhlhockeybetting.com/2009/11/is-hockey-too-fast-now/
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$3
November 13, 2009 11:18 PM
Why do you think NHL hockey has become more dangerous in recent years?
The hits are more vicious and causing more injuries, over 700 have suffered concussions since '97 and the percentage of injuries has risen each year.
Why do you think hockey has become more dangerous and what steps does the NHL have to take to make it safer, if any?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdj4ZdTFYZo
Why do you think hockey has become more dangerous and what steps does the NHL have to take to make it safer, if any?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdj4ZdTFYZo
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| November 14, 2009 12:03 AM |
The way to tell if it's induced by management will be if you see a statistically different quantity and quality of violence happening during playoffs compared to ordinary season play.
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (8)
November 14, 2009 12:52 AM
The NHL has recently been in a financial rut. The ratings have been down for sometime now. I think the increase in violence may be the effect of trying to attract certain viewers. Another reason it may seem more violent is because the athletes are bigger and stronger these days.
Permalink | Report
November 14, 2009 08:57 AM
The players are getting stronger. More "goons" are being recruited. Why? Blood lust. We, of the reality TV era, don't care about the finesse or the game. We're there to see the pummeling. Sort of UFC on ice mentality. I really think that's it.
Source(s):
Observation.
Tags: goons, nhl, ufc, pummelling, danger
Helpful Answer?
(1)
(0)
Helpful: katey
Tip victoria_reid for this answer
November 15, 2009 08:50 PM
Interesting, I actually don't think there are more goons (there are actually less in most recent years)
I do agree that players are getting stronger and that UFC is beginning to influence some fights, you can see it clearly in some fights.
Report
I do agree that players are getting stronger and that UFC is beginning to influence some fights, you can see it clearly in some fights.
November 15, 2009 08:57 PM
hmmmm....goons bad choice of words. Just noticing the fight techniques, which brought it to mind. "I went to the fights, and a hockey game broke out!"
Report
November 14, 2009 02:04 PM
I think there are numerous factors as to why hockey has become more dangerous. As the video states, hockey has evolved immensely. That includes not only the equipment, but the players as well. Hockey players are younger, bigger, stronger, faster and for the most part, more aggressive. What I see during games is a majority of rough hits occurring when a team is losing. When players are down, they seem rather... frustrated, thus becoming aggressive and intimidating. Players are passionate about getting that win. Can the NHL change the nature of a game when teams are losing? Probably not. They can (and should), however, increase the severity of consequences for ugly game play, such as longer suspensions. I believe NHL general managers are already looking for a way to decrease hits to the head during games, which is a good step. Many of the hits in hockey (that lead to concussions) are considered legal and within rules, though. It will be interesting to see what their solution is.
I found a really great article in regards to the issues currently in hockey. It is in regards to the Buffalo Sabres' goaltender, Ryan Miller, who stated that the nature of the game has changed because a lot of the players have lost respect for the game and other players. The lack of respect is especially there when a player is vulnerable and not in possession of the puck.
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/sabres/story/859746.html
Source(s):
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/sabres/story/859746.html
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: twinpairs
November 14, 2009 04:09 PM
Is hockey too fast now??? Read below. http://www.nhlhockeybetting.com/2009/11/is-hockey-too-fast-now/
Source(s):
http://www.nhlhockeybetting.com/2009/11/is-hockey-too-fast-now/
Permalink | Report
November 14, 2009 04:57 PM
I think so because the players continue to get stronger and faster, therefore the checks become more violent. I think there should be bigger penalties for fighting and for cheapshots, (higher fines, suspensions, etc). Perhaps equipment providing more protection would help too. Technology has increased to the point that safer helmets can be used.
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: psionandy
November 15, 2009 08:52 PM
Right, they removed obstruction from the game a few years ago, it means players can't be slowed down, this causes a lot of train wreck hits involving two top speed players. Very dangerous
Report
November 15, 2009 07:22 PM
I think there is a difference between dangerous and violent. And it's not more violant. More injuries, yes. Better conditioning, faster, younger kids, better equipment (higher confidence in abilities). And also maybe pressure from upcoming Olympic Games team selection.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Alcohol and nicotine have been found to be more damaging than some illegal drugs, lik...
Do you have a favorite Cranberry Relish recipe? A dear friend of ours brought this t...
Do you think the economy is actually turning around or is it turning around in your a...
Do you worry about what others are thinking about you? If so, do you let perceived so...
Do you have a favorite Cranberry Relish recipe? A dear friend of ours brought this t...
Do you think the economy is actually turning around or is it turning around in your a...
Do you worry about what others are thinking about you? If so, do you let perceived so...
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- sabrinaona, November 21, 2009 04:46 AM
- lisacarol, November 21, 2009 04:24 AM
- hotpooja4u, November 21, 2009 04:23 AM
- jurasic_19, November 21, 2009 04:19 AM
- jonny998, November 21, 2009 04:02 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
It's just that I was living in Edmonton during the Oiler's glory days, and it was an open secret in the city that if there was a rule that Gretzky was not to be touched, but that for the rest of them, if there wasn't a certain minimal amount of slugging during regular season, then the coach would make their lives miserable and would start thinking about trading.
Take all of that and combine it with viewership ratings dropping in some of the secondary teams, like the Anaheim Ducks, where they're not really an audience of natural hockey watchers, and I can see management fretting over the numbers, and telling the players that if something didn't happen to get viewership up then the team might fold, so now the players are under stress, and then combine the effects of steroids on that, and kerpow... you've got a powder keg situation.
But during playoffs the rules change a bit to something that's sort of more along the lines of a gentleman's agreement between club owners in terms of what management can tell their players to play like, so I suggested doing a statistical analysis of hits in regular season versus hits during playoff, because if there is a statistically significant difference between regular season versus playoffs, then it's a consequence of management stressing out the players, otherwise, if the hits are the same, it's a consequence of more players being on steroids.