Simple: monkeys didn't stop evolving. The simplest answer that it's not exactly true that humans evolved from monkeys (apes, technically). Humans and apes share a common ancestor. We both belong to the order Primates, and the Family Homininae (to which both humans and chimpanzees belong) branched off from the superorder Hominoidea around 4-5 million years ago.

Or, in other words:

Primates -> Hominoidea -> Homininae -> Homo Sapiens (Humans)

Primates -> Hominoidea -> Homininae -> Pan Troglodytes (Chimps)
Permalink | Report

I am by no means a scientist but from what I know is that Evolution is a process, it took thousands and millions of years for apes to evolve into men as we know it today.

The monkeys in your zoo are not evolving fast enough for anybody to notice in real time, the only thing we've ever been able to watch evolve in real time would be small organisms... like Swine flu for example, that evolved recently from another type of flu and so on and so forth.

Teaching evolution is not a false teaching, so don't worry about your students, if they are religious they will choose to not believe it, but if they are curious they could learn more as it is standard science in most countries. It a documented fact, there are thousands upon thousands of studies from all different cultures from all different parts of the world, it is true. Evolution is rarely debated at high levels anymore.

If your interested in learning the science of evolution here is a great source that goes through each step explicitly, just tab through the pages, honestly

http://www.flickr.com/photos/33749589@N07/3526584601/
Source(s):
http://www.wwnorton.com/college/anthro/bioanth/ch10/welcome.htm

Permalink | Report

This answer has been voted unhelpful by users. Please click to view

The Darwins "THEORY" that we evolved from Monkeys is based on the notion that evolution takes time. Evolution does not happen over night, but over many years. Further more it dosent mean we evolved from the monkey you and me see today the monkey we evolved from probable do not exist anymore there for accounting why we came to be. Natural selection we were obviously better than the monkeys before us (presumeble) Should Darwin be thought in the class room? Yes. Should people threat it as the Truth? No. Theres a reason its a theory not a law or fact. No one really knows were we came from there is various Theorys out there Darwin being one of them and people need to understan that its a theory not the truth.
Hide

Source(s):
http://www.the-reality-check.com/Dogma.html

Permalink | Report

This answer has been voted unhelpful by users. Please click to view

They didn't evolve to begin with. The whole theory has been a crock from the beginning and it ignores huge amounts of science. Technically it's a "scientific theory" but so is panspermia -- the belief that aliens deposited life on Earth. In the end, people believe what they want to believe and ignore what they don't, and that includes scientific evidence.
Hide

Permalink | Report

Evolution doesn't happen over night...
Permalink | Report

This answer has been voted unhelpful by users. Please click to view

It is clear that you should not be a schoolteacher. I am ashamed that you apparently were representing our country in Thailand.

This question shows such a complete lack of understanding of evolution and science in general all one can say is that you desperately need to go back to school and begin again.
Hide

Permalink | Report

Here is a question for everyone on either side of the issue to think about. "What would make you change your mind?"
My family, except for myself, is very religious. So, I know what their answer would be. They would not change their mind unless God, himself, told them that evolution was the truth. (I'm not sure that they would take the word of an angel.)
For the rest of us, the answer is that we would change our minds if the overwhelming body of evidence that supports the theory of evolution was counterbalanced by an even greater body of evidence that supports a different theory. Because, for us to accept that evolution is not true, we would have to see a 1) theory, 2) backed up by evidence in all of the different scientific disciplines, that accounted for the existence of the universe and our position in that universe.
An argument that attempts to disprove evolution is not enough. There has to be another theory with other evidence. And no other theory has arisen that has such an overwhelming body of evidence to support it.
Why do we see so much evidence of layering in the Earth?
Why do all of the planets move in approximately the same plane?
Why does parts of the earth crust move in different directions.
Why do we have so much DNA in common with other primates?
These questions not only have to be answered by the other theory, there has to be evidence to support the answers.
Permalink | Report

The process of mutation, that leads to evolution happens all the time. When a mutation 'sticks' and leads to a permanent change in a species, we call this evolution.

This process takes millions of years.

Consequently, since Darwin created his theory, we haven't visibly seen much evolution, as it's only been 100 years, not the millions over which evolution is more clearly visible.

So - the answer is that Darwin (and many many others) would say that monkeys are evolving - as is every other species on earth. But rather like watching the hour hand on a clock, it's hard to see it, as it's happening very, very slowly and won't be visible in most cases for millions of years to come.

Evolution is a theory. Consequently, you can't call it a false teaching as long as it's presented as a theory and not as fact.

It is of course a widely accepted theory where there is a lot of evidence to support it. But nonetheless, it remains a theory. So, the presentation of it as such is necessary to maintain balance and objectivity in schools and a good education for our future generations - in the same way that it is necessary also to tell our children that there are a variety of theories about a variety of subjects and topics.

If our teachers clearly help them distinguish between fact and theory they can make up their own minds and learn how to make judgments based on the presentation of evidence; a necessary skill in life.

(You'll notice that my answer doesn't make any judgment on the validity of evolutionary or any other theory on how we came to be who we are today)
Permalink | Report

As someone mentioned, humans did not evolve from monkeys but both came from a common ancestor. After the split, monkeys continued to evolve, that's why there are baboons, chimps, gorilla's, orang utans (even different on different islands), etc. And the evolution continues, but you don't see a monkey in a zoo suddenly change into another species, that's true :) It takes a few million years.

And humans continued to evolve and differentiate as well. Or did God create separate Caucasian, African (Hutu, Tutsi, Pygmy, ...), Asian, Australian and Native American (sorry if I forget someone) Adams and Eves? No, that's continued evolution, or how do you explain the differences? Only recently, the remains of a new human species, that lived until about 8000 years ago, was discovered on the Indonesian island Flores.
Source(s):
Education.

Permalink | Report

A little thing called "time" comes into play here, unless you are one of those religious people like Bishop Usher who figured out the date of creation at 4000 BC or so (1).

Scientific methods would place the age of the Earth at 4.5 Billion years and the initial evolution of hominids at around 4 Million years before the present.

Darwin (with the existing state of knowledge 100 years ago, or so) described the very small changes that take place in species as they reproduce - usually these variations are very small. Sometimes the changes favour the individuals reproduction and sometimes they don't.

Very small changes over long time can produce amazing effects (eg, the Grand Canyon). You don't see it getting any deeper in your tiny lifespan.

This was the genius of Darwin (and others) to suddenly have this insight into the way things work.

Animals that live very short lives evolve much faster - eg viruses and bacteria.

By the way, most people who have studied this issue do believe in Darwin's Theory of Evolution. In fact, it is very hard to understand why any school would teach any other theory in a science class.
Source(s):
(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology

Permalink | Report

Personally, I'd focus on exposing the students to all of the popular theories and let them decide for themselves.

Teaching evolution solely is somewhat problematic because although there is a lot of evidence to support evolution's existence (adaptation), there is little to support the abiogenesis theories. Then there is the matter if irreducible complexity.

Teaching creationism solely is problematic as well for the same reasons.

Teach both and leave your personal beliefs out of it. It's ok to say "I don't know" because in this case, we really don't.
Permalink | Report

Although most answers here are correct in pointing out that we did not evolve from apes/monkeys, but rather had a common ancestor, there is still a raging debate going on about the Theory of Evolution.

http://lifewithalacrity.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/evolution.jpg

A 'Theory' is NOT the highest scientific level accorded to a postulate, as evidenced by the following 'laws':
Bernoulli's Equation, Law of Thermodynamics, Charle's Law, the Drake Equation, Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, Hubble's Law, Nurgaliev's Law, Sommerfeld-Kossel Displacement Law, Zipf's Law, Newton's First, Second, and Third Laws of Motion, Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion, Boyle's law, Mendel's Laws, et al

http://www.enlightennext.org/magazine/j35/images/evo1.jpg

Not wanting to ignite a creationism vs evolution or rather science vs religion debate here, suffice it to say that the fire rages on, and there are countless instances of the theory being discussed at all levels of scientific thought. The following online resources will help you make up your mind.

1. The Conflict Between Religion and Evolution
http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=395

2. Long-Settled Evolution “Debate” Rages in Texas, Louisiana
http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blog/long-settled_evolution_debate_rages_in_texas_louisiana/

3. Brown University professor breaks down evolution debate
http://www.kstatecollegian.com/brown-university-professor-breaks-down-evolution-debate-1.1652262
The comments section in this article are an eye-opener!

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/155/355611772_e660e59ac1.jpg

From http://www.enlightennext.org
"Between the Neo-Darwinists on one side and the Intelligent Designers on the other are at least ten more "schools" of evolutionary thought. Here, we've spread them out along a spectrum from science to spirit, with scientific materialism on the far left and religious determinism on the far right. Generally speaking, the closer a group of scientific thinkers appear to the center of the chart, for example, the closer its view of evolution comes to integrating the dimension of spirit, and vice-versa—an integration that manifests most fully in the three groups in the middle."

http://www.sullivan-county.com/images/sci.gif
Permalink | Report

As many have stated above, the theory is that evolution takes a very, very long time to take place. While I am no scholar on this subject, I have always thought that even though it does take a lot of time there should be some evolved creature between Humans and apes (the Missing link). While many will say there is a missing link that has yet to be discovered I personally do not believe this. It seems strange to me that the link would go completely extinct without a trace while humans and apes survive. I do feel that the majority of the theory is accurate, but some points, such as humans from apes, are wrong and will never be proven.
Permalink | Report